this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
285 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

32412 readers
482 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's always been the problem with surveillance, but these twats never seemed to realize it when they brought it up. How fucking stupid can you be before you just forget to breathe for an hour or two?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

twats never seemed to realize it when they brought it up

oh they realize, they just don't care

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 11 points 1 day ago

It'll never abused nor fall on the wrong hands. Never. And then it does and they act like nobody could foresee that happening. It's infuriating.

All the data collection going on, it'll backfire spectacularly eventually.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If what Trump is going to do with the surveillance powers is exactly what it was intended the president could do with them, is it really misuse?

In software engineering, we call this "works as designed."

Yes it sucks more that Trump specifically will weild them. But the real problem is that the office of the presidency has these powers. Not specifically which president had them.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think non-software people call this getting their face eaten by leopards.

Our "left"-centre government party here in Germany is still trying to pass the next version of a surveillance bill, which has been struck down multiple times for being unconstitutional over the years. All the while, it is getting more and more likely that we will have our own neo-nazis in power next year.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 0 points 15 hours ago

It is amazing you don’t see it is all an act to pass and divide the blame

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

wym neo, west germany never got rid of the og nazis in the first place https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Heusinger

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I think a good approach to any type of government powers is considering that future presidents/parties you don't like will also have access to these powers.

I would absolutely love it if the threat of the future Trumps is a limiting factor on government overreach.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

Not really a trump thing, as much as I despise the guy, the article says Biden pushed for this.

It's a bad bill and shouldn't be legal. The NSA already has so much power.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago

Top Senator Warns Sweeping New Surveillance Powers Will “Inevitably Be Misused” ~~by Trump~~ by everyone

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Privacy is a basic human right.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Subset of the right to be left the fuck alone if a human desires it.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Tell my landed lord.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good luck explaining that to the "I got nothing to hide" crowd...

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All Americans who have ever used the internet have violations of the CFAA, since website TOS violations are legally as criminal as hacking NORAD (the CFAA was passed after Reagan saw wargames ) normally letting your twelve-year-old start a Facebook account gets you 25 years, if some prosecutor wanted to enforce it. And they think that's ridiculous and don't.

However, if that prosecutor wants to turn a five month sentence into a ten year sentence, then the suspect's CFAA violation history might be useful after all.

And that is just one of the laws that overreaches and is easily broken and not usually enforced.

Suddenly you may have something to hide after all, say if they're rounding up gay felons and any petty felony would make your gay ass qualify. (The German SD and US ICE both ignore violent felon requirements when they're rounding up folk to be detained and deported)

[–] mikarv@someone.elses.computer 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@uriel238 @pivot_root Not all TOS violations are relevant at all the CFAA, and very few are after the significant narrowing of the CFAA by the Supreme Court in 2021 in Van Buren v United States.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

Yes! That was a vast improvement. It's not the only way that Americans are felons if the state needs to decide they are, or if they need to add charges / sentencing considerations if the prosecutors really want to throw away the key, such as embarrassing VIPs or killing rich people.

Still, you don't want the police looking at your entire internet history, even if you believe you have nothing to hide, they will find things that they find objectionable enough to justify treating you roughly.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you got nothing to hide, what's your credit card number?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not a valid BIN/IIN.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

8742 6689 0420 8832

Jokes aside, that might work. I'll try it next time.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago

Afaik there is no company that starts their cards with 8, so I doubt it'll work.

3 - AE

4 - Visa

5 - MC

6 - Discover

1 is used for airline cards iirc.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 31 points 1 day ago

the new surveillance power we currently have was abused by Bush Jr, Obama (who made it more invasive), Trump, Biden, and now Trump again.

Follow the constitution you fuckers! No more spying without a warrant!

[–] Buelldozer 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The President has too much fscking power and civil liberty people have been shouting about it for more than 20 years now.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But expanding executive power helps break legislative gridlock! It's not like Americans will ever elect an unhinged criminal lunatic to the Presidency.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How did all these laws Trump can abuse on day one get on the books, I wonder? They should find the guys responsible for passing them in whatever organism they used to discuss them

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Biden pushed for the bill.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Properly worded headline: Top Senator Warns Sweeping New Surveillance Powers Will “Inevitably Be Misused” by us

[–] spacecadet@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, let’s not pretend this isn’t absolutely a class issue. Snowden, Assange, and Manning happened under Obama. This is an “us” vs the “elites” Trump is just a convenient excuse for the next democrat to abuse these same powers and be like “well Trump was doing it”

Edit: if you don’t think the Biden administration isn’t doing the same thing right now to protect our precious “Healthcare” CEOs from another “getting even” attempt you are sadly mistaken

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This right here ppl. Read it and dont say u werent warned

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago

No one is saying that.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Here is my shocked pikachu face. 😱

Just trump?

Oh boy, theres soon gonna be people even worse than trump.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Probably not by the Useful Idiot, but certainly by his puppeteers.