this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
308 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2941 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 124 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Of fucking course we did...

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I understand why the first proposal from Russia was rejected, but this one should have been pretty uncontroversial. This is really a WTF moment for US diplomacy.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is really a WTF moment for US diplomacy.

Not really, considering the US's past actions and decisions, especially regarding Israel.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately not. If you’ve been paying attention, this aligns pretty well with their behavior in the past.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Saying it's status quo doesn't contradict how WTF it is.

Honestly it is completely normal for the US to veto these actions against Israel. Basically for anything to get through the security council it has to be targeting some one who is not friends of one of the 5 permanent members; The USA, The UK, France, China, and Russia. So that happens almost never. By the way the permanent members were all the counties that had atomic bombs at the time of formation. Not that is relevant to this discussion but a great little mind fuck factoid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] isles@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What, like we're going to break our streak now? To governments, human lives are spreadsheet entries at best.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, you'd think that if it was all spreadsheet shit we'd at least have the sense to side with a horrifically oppressive country that gives us something of value in return instead of just spitting in our face and demanding more support.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're pretty convinced they give us leverage in oil energy. We'll do just about anything for literal power.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We’re pretty convinced they give us leverage in oil energy.

I don't think they do, though. And I'm pretty sure the US government knows that.

Ah, domestic politics. What a fun way to ruin international politics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 67 points 1 year ago

"We believe we need to let that diplomacy play out."

Is that what we're calling it now?

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget we're the good guys, everyone!

[–] mundane@feddit.nu 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And we didn't fight it because the enemy were bad people. We fought it because we were attacked.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, we don't teach in us schools the isolationist position of ww2 or the war profiteering during both ww¹ and ww² while playing the isolationist.

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Between the indiscriminate chemical weapons and the nepotistic generals ordering hundreds of thousands to their futile deaths, isolationism in WW1 was still probably the right idea.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sure but you'd have to actually be isolationist not war profiteers.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying barring Pearl Harbor the US would not have participated in WWII?

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We were already participating in WW2 before Pearl Harbor. Lend-Lease was packing the UK chock full o' guns, food, and oil. The "Arsenal of Democracy" speech was 1940.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And waited until it was already clear that the Nazis we going to lose before entering the European theatre.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

And dropped two nukes just to flex its powers. Mind you those nukes were dropped at the end when it was only about time for Japan to capitulate. Killing directly and indirectly hundreds of thousands of innocents.

Don't forget the fire bombs over Tokyo, a city of mostly paper and bamboo houses, causing an exodus for innocent people.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

does anyone know another word for complicit, I'm tired of saying it

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

I'm shocked. Shocked. Well not that shocked.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Washington traditionally shields its ally Israel from any Security Council action.

The rest of the article is extra.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Came here to say this... The US has been doing this for decades.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh but its a problem when Russia does it?

[–] doctorcrimson 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah, honestly the Superpower Vetoes have been the biggest flaw in the UN since its conception.

[–] BWchief117@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Call it a flaw if you want, but it is also probably contributing to no more world wars

[–] doctorcrimson 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's less effective than it could be with the ability to check world powers and their allies with financial incentives among other things.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The vote on the Brazilian-drafted text was twice delayed in the past couple of days as the United States tries to broker aid access to Gaza.

Ambassador Zhang Jun accused the United States of leading council members to believe that the resolution could be adopted after it did not comment or express opposition during negotiations.

Thomas-Greenfield said the United States was disappointed the draft resolution made no mention of Israel's rights of self defense and she blamed Hamas for the Gaza humanitarian crisis.

The draft resolution also urged Israel - without naming it - to rescind its order for civilians and U.N. staff in Gaza to move to the south of the Palestinian enclave and condemns "the terrorist attacks by Hamas."

It has vowed to annihilate Hamas after the Islamist militant group killed 1,400 people and seized hostages in an Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

The draft U.N. resolution condemned all violence and hostilities against civilians and all acts of terrorism and called for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.


The original article contains 518 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We are no strangers to genicides so no surprise here. How did Israel, founded by genicide survivers become the ones doing the genicide?! (rhetorical)

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Genocide, uh, finds a way.

From an evolutionary perspective, the history of life is made from genocides, with survivors riding on top. Everybody's fighting for their niche.

Similarly, the abrahamic religions compete for their access to the Holy Land.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes to

Genocide finds a way

But absolutely not to

life is made from genocides

Humanity reached its current level because way more cooperation and kindness than war and genicide. We are just predisposed to focusing on the bad things. No one notices someone that does small acts of kindness.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 9 points 1 year ago

"We are on the ground doing the hard work of diplomacy," U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, told the 15-member council after the vote. "We believe we need to let that diplomacy play out."

"Yes, resolutions are important. And yes, this council must speak out. But the actions we take must be informed by the facts on the ground and support direct diplomacy efforts. That can save lives. The council needs to get this right," she said.

US not only want to play hero, they want to play THE hero it seems.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Russia veto: GENOCIDAL MANIACS

US veto: Go Go Israel <3

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

We need a new UN without the US. It is only there as Israel's PR spokesman.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] octatron@lmy.drundo.com.au 2 points 1 year ago

Time to kick the US to the curb. Fuck em and their Christian BS. Do what must be done rest of the world. Permanent trade sanctions for Israel!

load more comments
view more: next ›