this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycles

3009 readers
52 users here now

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The sub header of the article describes it best.

"This can only end well," said anyone who has ever ridden a bike through traffic, ever

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Mmmm, yeah, let's have a novel road concept that will confuse unfamiliar drivers and also pit cyclists directly against cars in the same lane. Sounds great.

[–] mooseknee@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

This was done in some town in California I think a few years ago. It actually did slow traffic and caused drivers to pay more attention. Overall though the area wasn't happy with it and they reverted it. I think in that case, though, the municipality just changed it overnight without warning or consultation.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Having the entire road unmarked seems like it would work better than whatever this is.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Design a road that will deter cyclists from using it without saying you're designing a road that will deter cyclists from using it.

The idea of having protected bike lanes and bike paths that are completely away from roads is because NOBODY CAN TRUST DRIVERS. It's as simple as that.

Keep us as far away from these vehicles of mass destruction if you care at all about safety.