this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
122 points (95.5% liked)

politics

18839 readers
3508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a little ironic, but we're in the same boat France was, in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq after 9/11.

We're distant enough to have some perspective, and we have personal experience with this exact phenomenon. But whether we like it or not, we do have a pre-existing diplomatic and military relationship at play, and that complicates matters severely. Not supporting your allies in their time of need, regardless of whether they deserve it or not, is a heavy choice to make, with consequences of its own.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Bro the US can literally flip flop in any direction every 4 years. The only thing it cares about is money, and the best way to make that money is with war and oil. That should be the national motto.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Fortunately we can flip flop on that too, it's not impossible. The term "military-industrial complex" itself was coined by President Eisenhower, WW2 general and 2 term pres, in his farewell address to the American people, when he explained it to us as a likely future problem.

Before WW2, we disbanded most of our military after basically every war. Much cheaper that way. Though always costlier in the first stretch of any new war.

These kinds of broad changes, like say, battling the robber barons of the 19th century, tend to take us more than a generation to fix, though. We're not static, it just looks that way at personal timescales, about 99% of the time. It's an illusion though, with proper training and/or practice you can see right through it.

[–] zzzz@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for your optimism.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I'm not alone, extremely cautious optimism is fairly common with more old school liberals.

Historians like Stephen Kotkin and Yuval Noah Harari frequently take these kinds of positions, with Kotkin having been pretty active regarding Ukraine, and recently Harari having to take some really difficult, nuanced positions about a situation he, his family and friends are literally living. He is a historian at the University of Jerusalem, if memory serves.

Here's a recent interview he did: https://youtu.be/9qaxYQqmzIg?si=hq3dbjC9gHGB4kXE

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

We were a more honest society then. The department of defense was appropriately named the war department, and not one of our many Orwellian jingoisms.

We also raised tax to pay for the war then too, and sold bonds to the public to fund it. Thats what part of the "war effort" at home was about.

Now we just devalue the dollar and rack up debt we will never pay. The rich already own everything money can buy, they won't give two shits when it's worth less than toilet paper. They've made out with everything of value while paying you less and less every year.

Stealing anything good any of us ever made with our wasted vitality and youth.

They're a fucking cancer that needs to be excised.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I see right through it, it's a country founded on the genocide of native Americans, made strong through the enslavement of a kidnapped people for 400 years, and then made the global dominant superpower thanks to capitalism, war, and oil.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

Excuse me? I thought the motto was “The freedom fries must flow”

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 25 points 11 months ago

Fine. He isn't employed to make policy. If he disagrees with the policy that much he should resign. Man has a modicum of integrity, agree with him or not.