this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
142 points (96.1% liked)

Games

17108 readers
442 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

"We are looking into a way to turn this into multiple subscription services focused on getting you to gamble that will be allowed in our primary markets."

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They're going to holistically synergize the market capitalization to optimize a paradigm shift for shareholders.

They expect it to bomb and they're going to flood it with microtransactions and vague "AI-enhanced fetch quests" or some bullshit.

They're not trying to make a better user experience, squash bugs, or polish the story, they're "extracting value" - I'd stay far away from this one folks.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

They’re not trying ro make a better user experience, squash bugs, or polish the story, they’re “extracting value” - I’d stay far away from this one folks.

This has been true of Ubisoft for many years. I'm glad they're saying it out loud now though.

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The way they word that is amazing, you can't really fluff that up anymore. Looks like they expect it to bomb.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't know if there's a combination of words that has less content, or destroys any hope left for the game more thoroughly than what they chose. Never could I have imagined that one sentence would manage to bottom out both categories at once. Give my compliments to the ~~chef~~ MBA!

[–] MelastSB@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A game set in Japan releasing on March 20 is like a game set in America releasing on September 11

[–] Skipcast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Doesn't sound like a problem to me?

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Please stand by, the game's finished but we need to find new ways to manipulate you suckers into spending more."

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is absolutely no reason to buy a Ubisoft game anymore, or from any large studio that is trying to appease shareholders first and foremost. They aren’t making games for you to have fun with; they’re making games to extract as much money from you as possible. Instead of giving you fun quests and characters, they are behind the scenes trying to figure out how to manipulate you. Fuck that noise. The last game I paid full AAA price for was Elden Ring because From deserves my money.

Didn't they get bought out recently?

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago

Sounds like they're adding microtransactions, buy your pack of 500 jumps, get 100 vaults for free! Also Denuvo.

[–] hondaguy97386@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

Sounds right, fuck the players.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Yea, I couldn't care less what the shareholders want. The point of a product is to be good for the purchaser. Once you take your focus off making a good product, you're through.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point, it is better to let Ubisoft die. It is so interested in raising it's share prices, it has alienated it's customers. Now it refuses to learn from it too.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

At this point, it is better to let Ubisoft die.

But think about the shareholders! Now they cannot afford that fourth yacht. How will they survive?

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ubisoft is going to go bunkrupt or private this year, selling their most valuable assets. I say good riddance. I only hope we yet get to play Heroes of Might & Magic: Olden Era (Unfrozen is the dev but Ubi is punlisher and IP owner) and Anno 117: Pax Romana. Also wonder who will buy these IPs. Tencent?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

personally i would be willing to pay 15 cents for them

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. Making games should always about providing value for shareholders. Not about making a good game

Almost like shareholders would get value if they focused on making good games. Make good product, people buy, shareholder money go up. Why do we have to keep explaining that to them?

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nintendo, a Japanese company, is releasing Xenoblade Chronicles X Definitive Edition on the same day. Every day is the anniversary of a tragedy somewhere.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but Xenoblade isn't about Japanese historical events. It's a little too on-the-nose with Assassin's Creed.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1579 vs 1995? That's a huge stretch.

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Problem is that it's already rife with other insensitivities towards Japanese culture, it wouldn't be so bad if this was the only thing.

[–] 1984 11 points 1 week ago

Extracting value... Lol. :)

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

That bad, huh?

[–] DesolateMood@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wasn't a delay announced a few days ago? Is this the same delay or was it pushed back even further?

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Same delay. This is the 2nd delay of this game.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

the wording of that announcement evokes a similar feeling to how i write things when im nearing the end of a project, experiencing extreme crunch, and begging for the sweet release of the deadline finally approaching. i’m in a trance like state during those times, barely conscious, barely coherent, just doing what i need to in order to reach tomorrow.

i can imagine there are a lot of people at ubisoft right now experiencing something similar. do not mistake this for empathy. i don’t know what im saying.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

Is the CEO trying to short the stock or are they just that out of touch?

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Shit show of a game and a company.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not doubting it but is there a source besides Bluesky? I know he's a game journalist but I can't link a quote