this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
472 points (99.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

10175 readers
280 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 125 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

duh. its codified, theyre allowed to legally perform insider trading by their own decree.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Perish the thought!

I'm convinced members of congress consistently outperform the market because of their superior intelligence. After all, we elected them, so by definition they're the best of us. Right?

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nice, your sarcasm is so acidic it is almost eating away my phone screen

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Weird, on my end, it's eating my fucking soul.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fun fact.

As an investor, you can ride their insider-trading coattails legally by investing in the ETF's NANC or KRUZ.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

isnt this the disgusting reminder that they also made it so no one can find out their trades until 30 days later.. purposefully giving their self-made-legal insider trading illegal for regular people?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

NANC is up 53% over the last five years.

KRUZ is up 27% over the last five years.

Those aren't Pelosi numbers, but pretty good. You could do a whole lot worse.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The S&P500 is up 75.38% in the past 5 years, so following Nancy via the ETF wasn't anything special.

We all know she did better than that 53% though..

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

As of time of posting it SPY is up 91.6% in 5 years

But that’s not really a good comparison because the unusual whales funds are both new, started in 2023.

NANC mostly matched SPY since its inception, +1% or so

KRUZ actually under performed to date, with a 27% increased since inception as opposed to NANC’s 52%.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not sure what you're looking at but its 80% today, and it really was 75% yesterday. I'm not the only one who posted as much.

Maybe you're looking at a CAD version that has FX as part of it?

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are they notably great? DJI is up 47% over past 5 years. SPX is up 75.46%.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

NANC in particular matches SPY pretty closely, but with no dividend

KRUZ under performs

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

NANC and KRUZ are both only two years old…

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

So many more comments calling for revolution, riots, and assassinations than there are in actuality.

Easier to talk big talk I guess.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh yes by all means. Occupy Wall Street worked so well.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Occupy wallstreet was a peaceful protest, which started to work, so the media shut it down.

These L.A. wildfires are either approaching or have already hit rich people neighborhoods, and aren't expected to stop anytime soon.

It wouldn't surprise me if these fires started with the idea of burning the elite in mind. I'm not saying that's the case, but if it is......damn. Last I heard these fires already did like 3 billion in damage. If they hit the mansions it'll probably trillions.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Won't ever happen. Americans are complacent fools. They'll starve themselves for years if you promise them bread tomorrow.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Rioting? In this economy?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And once again Pelosi is highlighted despite many Republicans outperforming her in the market.

She hasn't been Speaker of the House for 2 years.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 79 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

She's consistently a top trader and personally derailed efforts to ban stock trading. I think she deserves the heat.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Other Republicans are consistently ahead of her. They also voted against banning Congressional insider trading.

Yet it's only Pelosi.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with you in that they should all be held accountable including Pelosi.

That said, the source is Fortune... I'm not exactly shocked that this article isn't 100% honest or telling whole-truths...

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago

She was the minority/majority leader. She didn't just vote against it, she organized toothless counter proposals to defuse momentum. She's more responsible than any of those other (also terrible) Republicans.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Abso-fucking-lutely.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm an equal opportunity rule enforcer. Throw them all in federal prison.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, we should just set up a big pitt. Like in that movie 300.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Wow, crazy that members of congress are on average better than most investors, maybe they should change careers!

No.. Seriously.. Please change careers...

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're capitalists, in that they capitalize on their insider knowledge and send others to jail for doing the same thing.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

It's not insider knowledge when politicians do it since they're not insiders of the company with more knowledge about the company than other people. They just happen to control the political environment and the contracts they get 🙃

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 weeks ago

SEC for thee, but not for me.

[–] FeloniousPunk 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Makes me want to turn to a life of crime.

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Problem is, unless you're rich and powerful crimes tend to have consequences - they only "just let you do it" when your account balance already has a certain number of digits...

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah but you have to have a lot of money to get elected.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

FeloniousPunk for Congress.

[–] FeloniousPunk 1 points 2 weeks ago

I pledge a chicken in every mosh pit

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

NANC

KRUZ

Two of the safest investments you can make

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks for the tip. I just checked them out.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't know what these represented till i googled them😂

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

I got a kick out of it when I found em

[–] italics2@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why are they allowed to play the stock market? Is it not a conflict of interests? Edit: Typo

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

"Keeping the Rich rich and the Poor poor since forever."

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 weeks ago

They're incredibly smart people. That's why they're in office. It's only natural that their smarts would cascade over to markets. Nothing to see here. /s

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Surprised Pikachu face