1032
submitted 8 months ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nickknack@lemmy.world 190 points 8 months ago

the idea that sick days somehow impose a financial burden of the company is a blatant lie of criminal proportions. It is a justification for wage theft

people should use all of their sick days

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 68 points 8 months ago

Why do you even have an allocation of sick days? It's not really a concept anywhere I've worked (in the UK).

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago

I’m in the US and I get 3 paid sick days a year. Anything more and I don’t get paid PLUS I get a point. After 8 points I lose my job. We come to work sick unless we are in the hospital.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 85 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If Americans knew what workers rights were they'd be very angry to realise they have none.

[-] Caradoc879@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Most Americans still have their hears shoved so far up their asses that they think all of Europe is a freedomless third world region where the governments silence all criticism and doctors still use leeches or something. Just completely delusional and in denial.

Of course most Americans haven't even left their own state, never mind gone to Europe to experience it themselves.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MudMan@kbin.social 31 points 8 months ago

I'm always amazed by how Americans in particular (sorry if you're not, I'm assuming) tend to go from one end of the spectrum to the other without any middle stops in common sense land. I once had a US friend go straight from "we have bad health care" to "we need a violent revolution" with no consideration to... you know, maybe good health care?

I mean, from my perspective it seems pretty obvious that you should only take as many sick days as you need, but you should take all the ones you need, to an unlimited total amount.

Like, that seems so simple. It's how it's always worked in the multiple countries I've lived in. You're sick? You call in sick. You need to be off for multiple days? You ask your doctor to officially declare that you're sick. The company is taking a hit? The government covers your wages during your long term sickness.

This works. We know this works. It's obvious this works.

[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

We don't believe that the government will let us have good Healthcare without revolution at this point. One side violently opposes it and the other dangles it like a carrot on a stick for votes, with no intention of actually providing it because if they actually improved things somewhat they'd lose a precious bargaining chip. This song and dance has been going on for as long as I've been alive. We're losing hope here.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 123 points 8 months ago

This starts in school with awards for perfect attendance

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 71 points 8 months ago

Really sums it up tbh. No one gets through school without needing a sick day, but they offer children a worthless piece of paper for being obedient enough to risk everyone else's health.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 8 months ago

Dont know about other kids, but seems like I had strep throat and conjunctivitis at least twice a year. Thankfully I did NOT have perfect attendance.

Maybe its an award for children with especially strong immune systems? Cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MBM@lemmings.world 14 points 8 months ago

Whoa what, is that a US thing or something?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 88 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Take every single day you're entitled to. The days of working yourself to death so you get a pat on the back by the boss is well over. You come first

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 22 points 8 months ago

Bro there's still so many idiots at my workplace working their life away for a stupid card that says "best performer of the month". I got no problem with that but the issue that I have is they make life hard for guys like me. I know and they know that they can't afford a shitty 4 bedroom house so why the fuck slave so hard. I really don't get it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pgp@sh.itjust.works 61 points 8 months ago

America is something else entirely.

[-] quams69@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago
[-] Mannimarco@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Have you tried pulling a little harder on your bootstraps?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] penquin@lemm.ee 58 points 8 months ago

LOL! Then don't offer it. Let's see who will work for you. Fuckers want to enslave people.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

"let them die! I need my 4th yacht!" -CEO and other top-level management, any large co

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 56 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Wall street is the psychotic, insatiable, dehumanizing tail that wags the dog, one petulant tantrum-a-minute to the next, and the next, and the next... perpetually.
God forbid anyone in a corporate position of power try and do anything that isn't indecent and corrosively myopic, else the stampeding Dow Jones zombies go on a goddamned short-selling rampage.

But then people have been saying this for ages now, and still here we are.

EDIT: added "insatiable"

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

I remember a story about a CEO who decided to pay ALL of his employees well. As I remember, all of his middle management left in a huff because they no longer had their higher earnings to hold over their subordinates and feel superior, all of his friends ostracized him and he essentially became a pariah.

Yeah, Dan Price, just went to look it up. Apparently, he had to resign after some allegations against him, which turned out to be false. Something smells off about a man paying employees fairly suddenly getting trumped-up charges that never got properly investigated before being referred to the prosecutor's office literally the day after he announces the pay stuff.

https://fortune.com/2023/04/19/gravity-payments-dan-price-assault-charges-are-dropped/

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

He resigned because someone that has part ownership in the company sued him.

The lawsuit was basically “you’re not acting in a way that is best for the shareholders”

Or in other words “you’re paying the employees more and me less, so I’m mad at you for treating them well”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

The stock market should be abolished entirely. The driving force behind big business and government decisions should be humanity, not money.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 50 points 8 months ago

The whole reason sick days are a thing is that giving employees paid sick time costs you less when they don't come in and make other employees sick. If enough people get sick in a given org, that has a way of really impacting everything about a workplace, it really is cheaper if they stay home until they're not contagious.

The worst part of this situation, to me: that anyone is pressing for sick leave to be tightly audited, or seeking to frame its use as a sort of graft or taking from the employer, or a pretext for preemptively firing employees deemed guilty of being too sick. This kind of talk creates pressure for employees to come to work sick in order to avoid being seen as slackers or thieves, and that in turn (especially in an environment full of flu and covid variants, doubly so on the heels of a fucking pandemic so we should all know better by now) defeats the point of having sick days in the first place.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

The whole reason sick days are a thing

Sick days are a thing because unions fought for them.

[-] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago

From the article

Prepandemic, Fleetcor workers in their 20s and 30s took one or two sick days a year, she says. Now, it's more like three to five.

So pandemic taught people how viruses spread and how not to spread them and coming to work sick is shameful, not a badge of honor. Still, 4 days a year isn't enough.

I worked with a guy, Clint, who had been at the company his whole life, worked his way from the factory floor to head of accounting. The thing Clint chose to brag regularly about was that he was 60-something and had never taken a sick day. Instead, he'd roll in obviously sick, sneeze on everyone, everyone he saw that day would get sick, a few of them followed his stellar example and got more people sick. During those times, no actual work got done except Clint lamenting about how everyone was getting sick. "Must be the weather."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

I know this couple who contracted COVID during the pandemic but refused to report it and take sick days. He - because his workplace was offering bonuses for employees who weren't taking sick days (don't remember if it was monthly or annually) and he didn't want to miss on that. She - because she already took all her sick days as PTO, without actually being sick.

I can't help but wonder if that's really what sick days are supposed to be...

[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 35 points 8 months ago

Perhaps Americans need to learn to call them wellness days and not place some arbitrarily low limit for amount of days on them. Ten or twelve to start a year seems reasonable. Americans are bizarre.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He - because his workplace was offering bonuses for employees who weren't taking sick days

Good god is that illegal in Europe. Employees are entitled to sick pay if they're sick, if no reason other than to ensure they don't come into the office and get everyone else ill as well. Also employees are actually required to take holiday pay, last year I got called into a meeting and got told I had to take more holidays because I wasn't taking enough.

She - because she already took all her sick days as PTO, without actually being sick.

Again illegal in Europe, PTO and sick pay are independent of each other. There's no limit on the number of sick days you can have, although if you go beyond a certain number you do require a doctor's note, but as long as you have that you're golden. In theory this is abusable, but because everyone gets PTO anyway, and actually get a decent number of days, there isn't really the incentive to do that.

It's bizarre the way the United States operates.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Employees are entitled to sick pay if they're sick, if no reason other than to ensure they don't come into the office and get everyone else ill as well.

Two jobs ago (in the States) my employer was extremely stingy with any paid time away from work.

I got six days. Total. (Not counting holidays.)

Six days for any and all purposes that one might need to not be in the office.

They even had the gall to say they offered sick days, "because you can use your PTO to stay home when you're sick".

Fuck that.

I came to work no matter how sick I was. I knew exactly how much I made in a day, and as soon as my boss or anyone else would complain about how I shouldn't be there, I'd ask them if they were willing to pay me my daily wage to go home. Because I only got six days, so fuck me if I was going to use any of them for anything other than my own enjoyment. If I was sick, I was miserable and less productive anyway, might as well get paid for that, and not burn any of my precious PTO.

On one occasion, I was so sick my boss actually agreed to send me home and pay the rest of my day without taking PTO...but of course the stingy bastard couldn't just give people more sick days.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] nufanman21@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago

Typical "back in my day" garbage. Why would you even want people to come in and spread their sickness? Wouldn't that cause even more lost production time?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 29 points 8 months ago

Well, media controlled and owned by business. What do you expect? 😅

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

Why do we even hold up the charade of calling WSJ by name when it's obviously just fox news (in ownership and content) with the lightest of filters for outright insanity?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago

People shouldn’t have to work sick. If we learned one thing from Covid, shut spreads around the office.

If someone is slightly ill let them work from home or take a day off.

[-] NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

I’m baffled that people are able to see their doctor quickly enough to get a note for proof that they were sick and need time off.

Where are these easily accessible doctors?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 8 months ago

The boot has now been completely incorporated in the throat.

[-] rauls4@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago

I’m an older worker. I have no qualms about using all my sick days.

[-] oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

My work recently changed their policy, we get 48 hours sick time a year. If you use it it's counted as an occurrence against you. Three occurrences in a rolling year and you're put on disciplinary action.

Here's your new benefit ...but you better not use it.

You can't make shit like that up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] eddietrax@dmv.social 18 points 8 months ago

American here. Have unlimited PTO. It’s definitely not the norm but it does exist. I came from a company with only 2 weeks paid time off (total).

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Unfortunately a simple "unlimited PTO" policy is fake pro-employee policy.

  • Overall, studies show employees actually take less days off under that policy, likely due to the uncertainty and stress over what is "really" the expectation, and how it will affect the employee's job security.
  • Employees end up working over vacations more often.
  • Since there are no fixed days, employers don't need to pay for unused vacation time periodically or when an employee leaves.

It plays out in a way that actually ends up harming the employee.

Every "unlimited PTO" policy should be combined with a minimum PTO policy. If you're wondering if a company actually cares about its employees' mental health, that's how you know.

[-] jscari@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

I’ve worked at a few places with “unlimited PTO” and I totally agree.

It sounds great in practice: “as long as your work is getting done, take as much PTO as you want!” In reality, it never works out that way because there’s never a “good” time to take a vacation; if you don’t have vacation days that you have to use, you won’t use them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] AmberPrince@kbin.social 17 points 8 months ago

I hated that article. I don't need all of the charged language or opinion. Here'sthe WSJ article if y'all want to read it of note, the WSJ isn't really making a determination here. Mostly just quoting out of touch executives and labor firms.

I'm all for work reform but how this comes back on the Wall Street Journal is beyond me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

In this thread: Americans bragging that not only have they never used a sick day, they used their lunchbreak to go back and wrestle the bear for their severed arm which they then reattached with staples they paid for themselves so they could put in a full afternoon of work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

Cool pro-tip that sometimes works to get around the WSJ paywall, especially if you use DDG. Search for the title of the WSJ article and put “msn” after.

It will sometimes send you to Bing’s google Amp-like (ugh, I know) MSN news site where there is no paywall.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Yeah, well fuck them. I used up my one week's worth of sick days and all of my PTO and am now on FMLA because I'm dealing with an illness that is causing me to miss work. What the fuck am I supposed to do? They told me to go on FMLA.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Know the laws for your state. Most of the states in the union are fucked, but some at least have something on the books.

https://www.patriotsoftware.com/blog/payroll/state-mandated-paid-sick-leave-laws/

Also, remember that paid sick leave is different from paid vacation. In many states, unused paid vacation must be paid upon termination, many times regardless of the reason for the termination. Unfortunately, my state is absolute trash and does not provide any protections for workers' rights or hold employers accountable for a damn thing. Hope this helps someone else though.

https://ask.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.info/cc-nto-vacation-rolling-pl

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Great article in terms of calling out the sentiment, but their analysis is really dumb.

Just to be clear: the idea that sick days somehow impose a financial burden of the company is a blatant lie of criminal proportions. It is a justification for wage theft — the most common and most costly form of burglary in America. Sick days are part of an employees' compensation package; therefore, sick days are just another form of money owed to the workers. If a company is spending the money that it legally and contractually owes to a worker

Not only is this not accurate whatsoever, as companies are not required to pay you for unused sick time (thus making it not wage theft - also it isn't wage theft to complain - but the money isn't contractually owed at all).

What makes this truly bad though is that employers that do pay out for unused sick time see way fewer incidences of "sick time as general PTO," and workers actually get their full comp, and should be a standard across all employers. They literally skip over the thing that would be better for workers and employers, in their analysis.

If a worker wants to trade pay for time off, that should be their right. They should also be paid for the time off they don't take, as it is indeed factored into employee comp on the corporate level.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] magoosh@feddit.nl 14 points 8 months ago

What kind of company doesn't insure against sickness of their employees? When I mentioned I was sick a lot, my boss at the time laughed and told me the company gets an insurance payment if I'm out, so not to worry. Fyi, I'm in Europe.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
1032 points (98.1% liked)

Not The Onion

11035 readers
1586 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS