this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
997 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19536 readers
3047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Representative Sarah McBride, the first out trans congresswoman, criticized Donald Trump’s executive order defining gender as strictly male or female.

McBride points out that biologically all embryos develop as female until the SRY gene activates weeks after conception.

The order, which ties gender to reproductive cells at conception, unintentionally categorizes all humans as female from conception based on biological facts.

McBride’s remarks highlight scientific flaws in the policy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eodur@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does this make him officially the first woman president? So progressive.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it's retroactive, then we haven't had a single male president.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] NudeNewt@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

So this means we did get the first female president! Yippee

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 218 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Anyone who thinks this shit is funny is in for a rude awakening.

They do not fucking care. They will use this the exact same way that they would have used it if it was worded correctly.

You don't get out on technicalities in fascism; if the autocrat in charge wants to do the thing, he will do it. All of these things will be used as cudgels against perceived political enemies, and marginalized US citizens.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I want people to try to be less pesimistic, the point is that technicalities like this will waste time. Every one of these exectuive orders is going to be challanged in court, and while the GOP controls the higher courts, these cases will start in the lower ones. With any luck, the lower courts will stay the order until things can get resolved. Every appeal, every challange takes time to process and judges are under no obligation to resolve things quickly.

The goal currently isnt to try and overturn the order, thats just pissing into the wind. The goal is to waste their time for 2 years and hope the house flips, if it does, we can send 47 back to his golf course for the rest of his term because he wont be able to accomplish anything.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago

Man, I'm tired of people calling realism "pessimism." It's kind of a huge problem actually when you think about it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They do not fucking care. They will use this the exact same way that they would have used it if it was worded correctly.

The reason why this is good news is that the more bizarrely worded the order, the easier it is to get it throw out in court, America even now runs on the WORD of the law, not the intent.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

America even now runs on the WORD of the law, not the intent.

Yeah except not really. Have you paid attention to recent SCOTUS decisions? They aren't even bothering to make cogent arguments in some cases, and hearing others that never should have standing in the first place.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheTux@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

This. In much the same way an elder god doesn't give a damn about conservation of energy or the square cubed law, a dictator with effectively un-checked power doesn't care about wording of executive orders or LAWS. Be careful.
Cthulu has woken from eons (4 years) of slumber (not being president) to ravage the planet, while looking like a moldy cheese puff.

Edit: thankfully he's not nearly as powerful as this metaphor implies, but the point stands. The law won't stop him, I don't trust the Dems to stop him, the only thing that will is worker's might.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival 87 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think the bigger issue is hiding in plain sight:

a person belonging, at conception

Personhood does not begin at conception.

[–] Lennny@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We all know that's why the mistake was made. It's not exactly rocket surgery.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

It’s a P2025 script. Oklahoma made it into law into September, with the same ridiculous misunderstanding of basic biology. It doesn’t matter, they know who they are supposed to oppress.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And if it legally does, since I'm a chimera, can I use the carpool lane?

[–] Rivalarrival 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You should apply for a second birth certificate, on the grounds that both of the "people" who were conceived were actually born. You should seek a second SSN, claim them as a dependent on your taxes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 200 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (19 children)

Theres two possible interpretations due to the at conception bit I think. Either he made everyone a woman, or he abolished gender all together. Either way this EO make Trump the single largest gender changer in history as he just changed the gender of either ~150 million or ~300 million people.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 3 days ago

It's fun to think about the hypotheticals, but the reality here is that it does not matter the exact words in the EO. We know what they mean, and they won't let some silly technicality stop them.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 27 points 3 days ago

"At conception" leaves no room for interpretation - he abolished gender altogether.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The president Donald Trump is the president with more women in their cabinet ever.

Dude is literally drowning in pussy

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Binders of women

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I wish, that'd be a hell of a headline.

"Muffled at Last, Serial Snapper Grabber Snatched to Death"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 134 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I'm not sure what is more disconcerting. That the people in charge truly are a bunch of fucking idiots.

Or that those idiots have outplayed and outsmarted the Democrats at damn near every turn for 20+ years.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The President in particular is very much a figurehead — he wields no real power whatsoever. He is apparently chosen by the government, but the qualities he is required to display are not those of leadership but those of finely judged outrage. For this reason the President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it.
– The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 days ago

At least McBride can now use the women's restrooms in the Capitol. And so must all the other politicians!

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I would laugh my ass off that this bites him in the ass because it makes all scientific distinctions useless when making more laws. Just because his dumb ass doesn't understand the nuance.

[–] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I KNEW IT!

I'M A LESBIAN!!!!!

I've known my whole life and it's a relief to FINALLY to be able to come out officially.

THANK YOU PRESIDENT RUMP!

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 114 points 3 days ago (12 children)
[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 73 points 3 days ago (8 children)

You've heard of non-binary gender, get ready for its upgraded form: unary gender

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TWO GENDERS ENTER! ONE GENDER LEAVES!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Trump: "You must identify with the gender you were at the time of conception."

Science: "Everyone starts out as women and don't become men until 6 weeks after conception."

Trump: "That is exactly what I meant. Everyone who knows science must identify as a girly girl."

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump decided he wanted to be the first female president obviously. Don't you liberals understand 5d chess!?

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago

"Trump beat Hilary to being the first woman president" is honestly hilarious to me. Sad, but also hilarious.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I feel like an invulnerable Goddess, in my sleep Trump tried to turn me into a man. I went Ultra Instinct and slapped that shit without waking up, and when I finally do get up I find that the whole country is one giant lesbian slumber party.

This shit aint nothing to me ma'am, Madame President could suck my gock if I wasn't post-op.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haha this is so awesome, she should tell that one to a trans person being denied healthcare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Donvict and his supporters (yeah, I know, don't blame the precious voters!) don't really understand science.

Someone should sue JD Vance for addressing Trump as Mr. President. Illegally addressing him as a man. Clearly sewing doubt in the direct orders of the president, it's detrimental to the entire country.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Damn. So that means all males (including me) are technically transgender.

I think I'll have some coffee, then.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Its so stupid that the government of one of the world's most powerful countries is occupying itself trying to restrict people's healthcare and bathroom usage based on some poorly understood and arbitrary rules about zygotes. Meanwhile, the planet burns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bad headline IMO, she's more so pointing out more flaws in it which is different than laughing it off

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

"This is logically flawed because " won't really bother a bunch of Young Earth Creationists. You're arguing with people who will retreat to the baseline argument "because God said so" in a pinch. Getting into the messy details of embryonic development won't save you, because that's not how their nominations to the FBI, the DOJ, or the Federal Judiciary are going to interpret any of it.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 38 points 3 days ago (23 children)

Actually it being poorly written helps a lot with court challenge. That was one of the reasons why so much was overturned in his first administration. There was a fear that this time he'd sign better written executive orders that would survive challanges instead we're getting a lot of them like this

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›