this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
-15 points (14.3% liked)

Relationship Advice

2600 readers
38 users here now

Welcome to the Relationship Advice community on Lemmy and Kbin!

The ideal place to ask for help with your relationships: romantic, friendships, we don't know what we are yet, co-workers or just human interactions in general.

Please make sure you read our rules before posting.

Rules:

Rules can be clicked on to be expanded.

1: Treat all users with respect. [!]

The goal of this community is helping OP and readers, not making fun of them. We are an inclusive community, any sort of disrespect towards ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, etc, will not be tolerated.

2: Mark sexual content as NSFW. [!]

Posts containing mentions or descriptions of sexual topics must be tagged as NSFW. This includes descriptions of sexual acts, requests for advice in the bedroom, explicit descriptions of your body and similar content.

3: All posts must be a request for advice.

All posts must be phrased as a request for advice or as a question. Sharing of stories, personal anecdotes, or past mistakes are only allowed if they're followed by a clear and relevant request for advice with the situation.

4: Provide sufficient and relevant information.

Your title and body need to contain enough information relevant to your situation, such as ages, genders, and the relationship between people mentioned. For privacy-related concerns, we recommend using fake names and broad general locations.

5: Comments must be on topic and relevant to OP.

Comments must be directly related to helping OP, asking for more information, providing relevant resources or otherwise relevant to the thread. Off-topic comments and remarks, suspicious attempts at gathering personal data from OP or other readers, or bullying will not be tolerated.

6: This is a community for requesting advice, not moral judgement.

Moral judgements, "AITA?" and other similar questions are better served by different communities.

Reddit reposts are allowed.

As a temporary measure and the result of a poll, Reddit reposts are allowed following an expanded set of rules: https://lemmy.world/post/317115

How are rules enforced and bans applied?

For the most part, this community operates under the assumption that users are acting in good faith and should be given second-chances for their mistakes. Posts and comments with very light rule violations, or otherwise undesired but mostly harmless content, can be removed by a moderator on a case by case basis without any further punitive actions.

For violations of our rules, we follow a “3 strike” system as follows:

  • 1st violation: 72 hours ban + moderator warning via PMs.

  • 2nd violation: 1 week ~ 1 month ban + final warning via PMs.

  • 3rd violation: 1 month ~ permanent ban.

The goal of this system is making sure users are made aware of their behavior before being permanently banned, but also protecting the community from any rule violations.

Exceptions:

While the “3 strike” system will be applied to the majority of situations, rules marked with a [!] in the sidebar signifies a rule that, if violated in an intentional, malicious or significant way, can warrant an immediate permanent ban regardless of the number of previous violations. This includes severe disrespect to users or groups, dangerous content, and similar.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought to just make a public post about this. I’ve seen many people get married with the vows “Death Do Us Part”

This is a good vow don’t get me wrong but I’d encourage finding an alternative that doesn’t include death unless you truly mean it. What this entails if you mean it,

If someone cheats. The other partner has the right to kill them, if one tries leaving without mutual agreement. The other one can kill them. It’s not about anything unhealthy but two people collectively agreeing to a statement.

If you don’t want that then something like Till Time Do Us Part.

This way there is no death involved and your relationship isn’t built on a false and shallow promise.

Like any weddings I go to. I will call out, if they ever ask if anyone opposes. Then I’ll explain this.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vzq@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Like any weddings I go to. I will call out, if they ever ask if anyone opposes. Then I’ll explain this.

Totally normal behavior.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago

Also in my culture. One of them if you would break a vow it could lead to heavy punishment or death. The other you say what you mean and nothing more and breaking vows. Are deeply harmful.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It’s important people don’t build their marriage off a shallow vow. I mean I wouldn’t want to my marriage to built off something I don’t mean.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why have you assumed that it's your responsibility to make this determination about someone else's relationship?

Fucking weird, man.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Hmmm it’s weird. I didn’t realize. I think it’s more not my responsibility but more it annoys me how shallow meaning can become or dimmed down.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I just uninvited you to my hypothetical wedding

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Hypothetically, may I bring them as a plus 1?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't like the concept of marriage so I may be poorly informed on this but my understanding is that "Until death do us part" means that you're both agreeing to cherish and respect each other til you die. Not that you'll kill the other one of they break that vow.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It’s odd to assume it wouldn’t have originally been that. Like I believe it is currently but in that case it’s because they find an alternative meaning to it. Since in my mind it’s like yes so you will part when someone dies or Till Death do us part. So in return if it’s that then I’d assume it has killing part of it if you both don’t mutually agree yk.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There's no "or else" in the statement. If you break the vow you broke the vow. Consequences of breaking a vow aren't necessarily death even in more barbaric times. Certainly not today unless you live in some backwards country that allows "honor" killing. Most people don't expect their relationship to fail when they get married but shit happens, people change, sometimes they're lying to their partner about who they are. It's not always something you can work through and stay together. Saying people deserve death for that is incredibly fucked up. Imagine someone in an abusive marriage having to deal with that.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

That is why I encourage to use other vows. So for example you don’t say a false statement. Like Time do us part. Though of what I’ve found and inherited there is a few cultures that truly mean it. If you break it. You bring dishonour upon yourself, your ancestors, kids and family in general. So while one of my inherited cultures while meaning it. If you broke the vow as I said would bring the dishonour mentioned above. It’d also basically deface you. You’d be less trusted or other. Though in my more other heritage. If you broke this vow. There would be heavy consequences or even death. As vows were placed on a spiritual level. Said in front of alters of gods/goddess.

This is why I also encourage people to find another saying. While most times. Even if this is said a person is abusive they can already get out. As most times if they can document substantial proof. Anyone would help them get out.

[–] NGnius@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm like 70% this is just bait, but I've got some time to break it down so I'll bite. For reference, the traditional vow is usually something along the lines of

I, [my name], take you, [partner's name], for my lawful wife/husband, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and health, until death do us part.

From OP:

What this entails if you mean it,

If someone cheats. The other partner has the right to kill them, if one tries leaving without mutual agreement. The other one can kill them. It’s not about anything unhealthy but two people collectively agreeing to a statement.

That's quite the leap from promising to take someone as your lawfully wedded partner until death to having the right to kill them if they do something you don't like. In fact, the vow does explicitly say that you have to take them for better or for worse, which would include just about any sleight against you, including cheating. So not only do you not gain the right to kill them, you yourself would break the vow if you stopped having/accepting them when they cheated.

If you don’t want that then something like Till Time Do Us Part.

This way there is no death involved and your relationship isn’t built on a false and shallow promise.

Is there actually a reasonable interpretation where promising to do something until death is less shallow than promising to do something until time progresses? Promising to do something for a period of time without specifying the period means that doing it for 1 second is enough. Unless you're going to die in the second after you get married, "until death" is a lot more meaningful.

If you're unwilling to make a vow with any heft to it, don't get married. Marriage is no longer required in a good portion of the world thanks to common law "marriages" now. In other places, marriage is just a legal contract which can be broken by another proceeding called "divorce", not "murder". In most of the world, it's agreed upon that nobody has the right to murder someone else in any circumstance except for war (and plenty of people would prefer that single exception be removed too).

Edit: I clicked post too early

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s confusing why it’s such a big leap. Also it’s odd to assume you’d break the vow after not accepting them cheating. From my cultural POV when you cheat. You’d forfeit the vow. Which would bring dishonour upon your family and that includes a direct disrespect of the other family. Leading to you saying. Hey I cheated, or tried leaving (Not leaving because of abuse) since I believe if someone was abusing you. They’d also break the vow since the vow is to protect, love and care until death.

Also I am sorry it came off as a bait.

For Time do us part. While it may seem lesser. It’s acknowledging the flow of time and how someone can change throughout life. Though in reality there could be a better option but it’s more making it apparent the importance of meaningful statements.

[–] NGnius@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It’s confusing why it’s such a big leap.

Because saying "I'll do [thing] until I die" is not the same as "If I stop doing [thing] you can kill me".

Also it’s odd to assume you’d break the vow after not accepting them cheating. From my cultural POV when you cheat. You’d forfeit the vow.

If the vow is broken by cheating, then the part of the vow about being lawfully wedded until death is also broken. So then you'd also lose your right to murder them to get out of the vow, since you're already out of the vow. If you'd like a fun take on divorce as murder, see The Orville's Moclans.

Which would bring dishonour upon your family and that includes a direct disrespect of the other family.

Is your culture Klingon? Because honour is not a real thing, it's just an excuse to shame people for doing things some don't like. If you've got a good reason why it has to be this way, I'd love to hear it. As it stands, that's just intolerance by peer pressure, which are both bad things to do. I'd encourage you to spend a bit of time doing some critical thinking about your culture, since I saw some of your other replies saying that some of your beliefs come from your culture. I come from a culture that still likes marriage a lot (Canada + Catholic), but that same culture is also responsible for (triggers incoming) genocide, child abuse, cultural cleansing, and rampant pollution.

Hey I cheated, or tried leaving (Not leaving because of abuse) since I believe if someone was abusing you. They’d also break the vow since the vow is to protect, love and care until death.

I'm not going to defend cheating too much, but the vow has no statement about monogamy (though that is usually and reasonably assumed to be the case) so the pedant in me would like to point out that cheating is not breaking the vow. Even with the reasonable assumption that cheating is breaking the vow, the vow does not set consequences for breaking it. Technically, divorce does not even break the vow. It is also possible to protect, love, and care until death while ending the marriage. Even after a divorce, your partner was still your lawfully wedded partner. (I don't really agree with this paragraph, but it's a totally valid opinion with some strong arguments so I wanted to mention it)

For Time do us part. While it may seem lesser. It’s acknowledging the flow of time and how someone can change throughout life. Though in reality there could be a better option but it’s more making it apparent the importance of meaningful statements.

I'd like to believe that the vow is acknowledgement that they intend to fulfill it until death. From that basic tenet and knowing that humans aren't perfect [citation needed], it's easy to come to the premise that somebody might grow to realize they can't fulfill that vow, and so they want to get a divorce. It's actually probably the most protective, loving, and caring thing a partner could do -- realize they aren't good with their partner and so leave. The fact that they broke the vow does not invalidate their intent to fulfill it when they started the marriage. This is basically the idea behind no-fault divorce, btw.

If you want to acknowledge time by changing the vow from "death" to "time", you're definitely allowed to for your own wedding. But don't presume that people don't understand the meaning of what they're saying because they made a vow that they ultimately didn't keep.

Here's a parting thought: Would a good partner ever murder their spouse? Is human life truly valued lower than this made up concept called "honour"?

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Interesting to hear that first part honestly. Now the second part the reason why killing is ok within this case is because you have to regain your dignity and honour. A marriage is a binding of two souls and persons into one partnership. When one disgraces that partnership some are unforgivable aka cheating. Sometimes those who decide will forgive and give another chance but in this case most in my culture specifically the warrior side. Would never give a second chance. As for my culture no not Klingon but born into an ancient lineage of Norse and Frost Giant. With a secondary lineage by Pupil-ship. Ancient China. Now as for cheating. Of course it’s important to discuss the agreement before marriage. Like my Poly many times I can sleep with many people but for them to become part of my relationship everyone has to agree. For us at our official wedding. We will preform a ritual called the eternal bite of love. A bite to someone’s neck that creates a deep scar that will form a lasting mark.

Yes No Fault divorce at least for now is a thing until the upcoming president removes all them. Though I think it’s just most important to discuss how one see vows. So another doesn’t become misled. In the culture I’ve shared with kids, other partners. We all agree on at least one thing this Vow is life or death and cheating is equal to signing your death warrant.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If someone cheats. The other partner has the right to kill them

Where did you get that idea? "Until death do us part" just means until we are separated by death. Until either one of us dies, and not before. It's not a threat or a consequence, it's a time limit. It's supposed to mean you'll love your partner until you die.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

A mix of my own and partners love styles and cultural influences. I mean like if you are saying we will stay together and loyal till death. I’d assume by logic that means if someone breaks that vow then it can mean death? Since you are vowing to honour and care for that person until death and when you stop doing it. Then it’s like you’ve died or sealed your death.

[–] smokebuddy 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've been to a half dozen weddings over the past decade or so and not one of them did the "speak now or forever hold your peace" thing from the movies.

[–] DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Hahahaa yeah I’ve heard of stories it’s happened but not heard it myself. As I’ve only been to a few weddings

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Thank you, DaddysLittleSlut, for your advice on marriage.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Prenuptials are a better approach.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

oaths and vows are so 20th century