this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
597 points (97.5% liked)

BestOfLemmy

7456 readers
840 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 hours ago

Reminds me of how nick fuentes got banned as soon as he made a rednote account.

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

I fucking love that that stupid cunt got banned. Fills my heart with joy

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm from under a rock or maybe the wrong side the pond. Who's this? Some conservative nutjob with too much of a podium?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly so. She was very close to Trump, but his team ran her off for being too nutty.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 17 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

"too nutty" for trump's team? Holy fucking shit, I didn't know that was possible

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I believe she was the origin of "they're eating the dwawgs" comment in the debate

Only billionaires get to Sieg Heil in public, she just didn't know her place.

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If I remember correctly this person was too nutty even for Marjorie Taylor Greene. I'm not from the US but these crazies have made it into international news enough times that I know who they are.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 80 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine how gay people felt trying to get married until just a few years ago.

Banned for simply existing.

How about trans people trying to travel into or out of a country. Or applying for a job and having to submit their deadname and their birth sex revealing their medical history. Or getting pulled over and getting interrogated over their ID. Or trying to take a leak while at the office or a restaurant and being told they have to leave.

Banned for simply existing.

How about being born as a visible minority and getting stopped and frisked just for being in public.

Banned for simply existing.

But not being on Bluesky? That’s taking things too far!

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Until just a few years ago? Take a look at yesterday. It's back.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago

I have no idea what all the effects of that executive order are, but yeah I could see that being the case now in a lot of places.

Marriage affects your taxes, your ability to buy in a house as a couple, adoption, your will/estate, being in the hospital... A lot of important things.

It's really basic human rights.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 17 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Kinda shows just how "decentralised" bluesky actually is if they can just ban her like that.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Stop making centralized websites sound so good... banning known harassers and grifters before they can hurt people.

Also, you'd see the exact same complaining if this had been a lemmy.world account. Nothing stopping her from making her own instance, but she won't because she doesn't understand how any of that works and it's too much effort when she can just complain about being censored for her beliefs (to harass minorities or whatever).

The centralized part of Bluesky is the node infrastructure that connects all the instances together. As I understand it, anybody can start their own instance, but they all run through Bluesky's lemmy.world equivalent. I've seen plenty of people from other instances, but it seems like just a way to host your account off the main platform as far as I can tell from using the official app.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

You realistically cannot host your own Bluesky instance.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 6 points 2 hours ago

If you don't like it, just use the at proto protocol and make your own app.

Aside from that, it wasn't even her Main account that was banned. She was making multiple accounts,

And it was one of her sock puppet accounts that was banned.

Of course, after they realized she was making sock puppet accounts, they banned the main one also.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 4 hours ago

One instance app!

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 33 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Loomer finally gets to feel what its like to be the people she vehemently discrimates against, yet I get a feeling she won't learn a damned thing from that.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 33 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

She will not.

Their whole MO is whining when they lose, and crowing when they win. Whatever region of the brain is supposed to map their experience to other people, so that they can feel what that other person is feeling and imagine it as their own experience, is simply atrophied or doesn't exist. Their side and their own feelings are hugely important, and must be protected. Yours do not, because fuck you, you're not them. They do not apologize for this or make any attempt to hide that it is the way.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

In case anyone wants actual proof:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10281241/

They measured empathetic responses using an MRI. Conservative's empathetic responses are stunted.

[–] Rivalarrival 13 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Do we know what instance banned her?

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Rivalarrival 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Those are just client nodes, the actual server is the relay and there's only one of those https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

[–] Rivalarrival 5 points 3 hours ago

Thanks! I did not know this.

Off to make some space on my phone...

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 28 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Whatever the wrong lesson is here, that's the one Loomer will learn from this.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Well i mean she couldn't possibly be wrong, lol! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 49 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

These people can't stand stand they will be left behind in Twitter like being on the titanic

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 31 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Daria? I'm signing up.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That image reply actually made me laugh out loud.

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 hours ago

How I imagined a gif of that would be, that or a singular tear slowly forming.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago

This one is epic.