this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
823 points (97.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

724 readers
294 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So, you think that the same people who couldn't be bothered to vote are suddenly going to organize themselves and go on strike? What makes you think this will happen?

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to be everyone. I think I saw somewhere that the number just has to be like 3-6%

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Most places I have worked expect to have a few people out on any day.

Even a 10% cut back across the board wouldn't mean a lot, especially if other workers were willing to scab for overtime.

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Good point, but a general strike is far more than just not working:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_strike

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

OP is not wrong, but both are important.

If the billionaires were not concerned by the potential threat to their existence posed by democracy, they would not feel so motivated to destroy it.

Democratic government is among the most powerful tools that can be wielded by the working class against the capitalists.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I would like to know what this mythical democratic government exists alongside capitalism. As long as we have a society that's dominated by capitalism and capitalists, there is no such thing as a democratic representative government.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We can't get people to vote. There's no way we're getting a general strike

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

Many people cannot afford to strike

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The cynic in me says there's a big overlap between the unemployed and the unrepresented, so to speak.

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

There's a reason why for the longest time there was a lot of vagrancy (still are) and loitering laws. Was so that the unemployed and homeless couldnt have a voice without making themselves a target

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tried organizing a board game night with 4 people. Literally impossible.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

The most difficult part of every Dungeons and Dragons campaign is getting five working adults in the same room at the same time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The owners would last 10 days, especially if the duration was announced ahead of time. Maybe a general strike that had no end date, once it went 3 months or so, would have the desired effect.

Going Luigi on a bunch of them would be faster, more effective, with stronger effects that lasted longer. Probably fewer total deaths.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Exactly. They’d see 10 days and go “okay I can hunker down and outlast it.” But a general strike with no designated end? They’d capitulate after only a few days. Giving them a timeline only allows them to see the light at the end of the tunnel.

Kidney stones don’t suck because they hurt; The pain is similar to a bad muscle cramp. Bad, but not unbearable. They suck so much because you don’t know how long they’re going to hurt for. It could be a day, it could be two weeks, it could be a month, and there’s no light at the end of the tunnel until you know it’s passed.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

nah. the guy luigi killed was replaced instantly. i don't think they even cancelled that meeting he was going to.

it was effective to give them a good scare and brought a little bit of class consciousness to the people but it fundamentally wont change things.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, 10 days is way more than enough, it's even overkill.

If the full country, all workers, stopped for one (1) day, the billionaire elite would loose their shit.

Because they would instantly know that they lost control of the narrative, and that the people realized that it's them who have the elite by the balls, not the other way around, and they'd come begging to the table.

Americans aren't at that stage yet, but there's a chance that this cabinet and their incompetence will finally go too far and break the camels back.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

I think their point is you can’t just commit for only 10 days. It might take less than 10 days, but if that’s your limit, they might try and tough it out.

[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same reason they freaked the fuck out when we all had to shelter at home because of COVID. Didn't last long because they needed meat for the grinder and forced a lot of back to work regardless of the risks.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And only callex those essential workers heros while not doing anything that would actually help them. Like increasing pay or protections

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Ask any patient at a VA hospital. If the US calls you a hero, stop whatever you're doing and run away. Do not walk. Do not stop to help others. Get out of whatever situation they are calling you a hero for being in. They are doing that as a means of absolving themselves of responsibility towards you.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

There aren’t enough Pinkertons and cops to make everyone go back to work.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Cyrus is the One, man.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Even if there were, I'd refuse.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we could wipe a few trillion dollars out of existence in a few days all the rich would freak the fuck out.

People like musk have so much invested in the market and live off those investments by borrowing against those investments. They pay a fraction of their taxes that way through capital gains being taxed at a lower rate. The 1% have so much invested and all they care about is money!

If we held out long enough someone might just push trump out a window.

People are fucked either way, might as well go out on your own terms. That and its our last option outside of armed revolution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Be prepared! A general strike is scheduled for Mayday 2028, with UAW and CTU.

SAVE AND PLAN WHAT YOU CAN!

So that you can strike yourself, and so that you can help your neighbors, your coworkers, your comrades strike!

We've got 3 more years to prepare for ~10 critical days. If we are all serious about it and spread the word, and are truly prepared for the event, our demands and thus our conditions will improve greatly!

It is up to us.

Do we choose to accept the working situation we have become entangled in, or are we willing to sacrifice for something better?

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In 2028. The fuck? Now, my person. Now!

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 8 points 16 hours ago

Random people posting "General Strike Now!" on social media has been happening for years and nothing ever comes from it. A coordinated action like this, asking people to risk their jobs and go without pay for a period of time, is not going to happen overnight, especially when most people have zero experience with strikes. It's more important to take the time to do it right so that it has a higher chance of success than to rush into it. This is particularly important as this strike has the potential to serve as a "proof of concept" further down the line. Collective action is always an uphill battle, and for it to succeed requires careful planning, preparation, and patience.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Planning it for further out gives people opportunity to organize and save for missing 10+ days of paychecks. It does feel like if we wait that long though we'll be in a hopeless situation. Maybe organizing smaller general strikes like state or city wide in the meantime would help prepare and buy time for the big one

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

2028 is far too late. Climate, forced deportation, and widening inequality will have all of us so weak and poor we won't even survive the 10 days due to malnutrition.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Workers unite! A general strike is solidarity with everyone, except those delinquent bastards who do no work: Boards, CEOs and upper management.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn’t that part of what made the Occupy Movement so threatening to capitalists? The problem was however that it had no direction. The point was disruption, but there wasn’t a clear goal or demand till the end.

I’m all for memes, but what specifically would a general strike accomplish other than the governing class using every method, including police violence and fear, to immediately try to suppress the opposition?

In a society where the majority of people live paycheck to paycheck (by design) a 10 day strike will never happen. You’d be lucky to get 5% of the populace to participate.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Occupy refused to point out leaders knowing that Fox News would assassinate them in the media. Since they didn’t hand over leaders to assassinate, Fox News ginned up the story that the movement was directionless.

P.S. Please don’t “akually” about “Fox News” vs “The Media” in this context Its now a distinction without a difference. They’re all owned by the side winning the class war.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

please make the libs understand because i cant for the life of me

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, let's take this message and sow division instead! Great work!

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

You'll have to define what you mean by sow division. If you're talking about it from a liberal point of view, one that's defending the duopoly, they are the ones helping create that division.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

what makes you think that?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›