this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
237 points (98.0% liked)

Firefox

20340 readers
125 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Really excited about the new PDF editing features!

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At this point I'd be happy for people to understand what pdfs are and stop sending them on the emails with signatures that say "to open the file download adobe acrobat reader"... Like I received the other day.

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

-"Can you send me the vector artwork for this logo, not just a png?"

-"Sure, here you go."

It's the exact same png, just embedded in a pdf

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

At least cheating like this is still an svg.

<image width="20" height="20" xlink:href="data:image/png;base64,..."/>
[–] 1984 2 points 2 years ago

Nostalgia to the 90s...:)

[–] andrefsp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yes! This one is the big feature for me. PDFs are always a pain to sign.

On Linux I've been using Xournal which does the job pretty well, but I'm really looking forward to try it on Firefox!

[–] flamingmongoose@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When I saw that my reaction was "Why is firefox including a pdf editor?", curious if a lot of people will use it

[–] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you're running Linux, you'd understand why so many people are excited about that one feature. I sure am very excited. PDF editors on Linux (as far as I know) suck on Linux.

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Same for windows!

I guess I don't edit pdfs very often except latex?

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago

Oh damn this is a huge release. The last couple of updates have been pretty small on the user end but it looks like a ton of features finally were ready for release this time. They're even releasing some of their fingerprint resistance features as enabled by default which is really cool.

[–] 1984 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] dditty@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

DNS over HTTPS + encrypted keys for concealing web addresses from my ISP? Neat! That plus my VPN and I'm feeling really obfuscated.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

Unless of course websites don't implent it...

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I still don't get how I'd make it work with my pihole

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] olympus@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Probably in 120.
There are a lot of changes in 120 in format support.
120 supports hardware HEVC decoding.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're paying for HVEC support finally?

[–] Audacity9961@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's passthrough to WMF.

A really terrible decision for the open web.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

WMF? Windows media framework?

[–] Audacity9961@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Windows Media Foundation I believe, but yeah.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Gargari@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

That's a lot of new features

[–] mercury@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If Firefox 119 was so great, why isnt there a 120???

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] mercury@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

WHAT!?!?! why the fuck would anyone use chrome at this point?

[–] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh yeah? So if Firefox 120 was so great, why isnt there a 121???

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Again a button I don't want in the tab bar, but I'm glad that this time it can be removed with two clicks, without digging into about:config.

[–] olympus@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is not a new button, right? Firefox view already existed.
I like that they changed the icon of Firefox view. The firefox icon on it didn't make any sense.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh, you're right, I guess it's a new standalone version and that's why it reappeared for me.
I just searched and reactivated the options in about:config for the old version, nothing reappears (neither does the drop down menu) as long as I don't take firefox view out again from the customization menu.