There are some guilty pleas that won't result in your law license being taken away. Even some felony charges don't necessarily mean you get disbarred. But a felony charge for submitting a false instrument, is not one of them. That is a crime of moral turpitude, and I'm 95% certain she will now be disbarred.
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
205 points (99.0% liked)
News
22852 readers
3221 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Imagine throwing away a legal career and all the money and perks that go with it, for the orange asshole.
Blows my mind man.
I assume there will be a new proceeding against her at the Colorado Bar. She's already been censured.
Did the other 2 last week get disbarred as well?
deleted by creator
Hall --> Powell --> Cheesebro --> Ellis --> (?)
Flippity floppity. Who will be next?
PUT THE FUCKING CHEETO IN PRISON ALREADY
Lock him up!
Flippity floppity, trump’s ass gonna be his celly’s property.
What's the Secret Service's policy on prison rape?
Stupid bitch. She better help hang Trump.
Given how RICO works, every guilty plea increases the odds just by virtue of being a guilty plea.
As an attorney who is also a Christian, I take my responsibilities as a lawyer very seriously and I endeavor to be a person of sound moral and ethical character in all of my dealings,
Liar!
As an attorney who is also a Christian,
The bible says "Do not spread false reports".
So she failed at both of these things.
I couldn't care less about her claiming to be a Christian - it's meaningless really.
... but acting to undermine democracy is the antithesis of ethical behavior. I'm not just saying "it's bad", I mean that in whatever ethical paradigm you wish to use, acting against the interests of many millions of people for your own benefit is unethical.
She claims that her guilt arises through some sort of negligence, a failure to do the due diligence. If that's the way she wants to frame it then "egregious" doesn't begin to describe this failure. Bold claims require bold evidence. Any idiot could see that her client was spreading misinformation and she was complicit. "Knowingly" is barely relevant.
I couldn’t care less about her claiming to be a Christian - it’s meaningless really.
There are 2 aspects about this I care about. (1). I am getting more and more outraged that Christianity has become a gateway drug for neofascist extremism every time I hear one of these jerks making a big deal about being a "Christian". (2) The hypocrisy of these "Christians" simply pisses me off. It's obvious they ignore everything the bible says that they don't like, so why the pompous arrogance about membership in something you don't take at all seriously?
The moment I really understood who she is was when Molly Jong-Fast tweeted something about Ellis and she thought her best zinger retort would be to criticize Molly's appearance. Pfah, Christian - she's a terrible human being.
Disavowing is pretty strong. Are we sure she isn't just sorry it didn't work so she could get away with it?
She is mad at Convicted Rapist Treason Trump for not paying her legal bills.
Whoa. Let's change the colloquial use of CRT to Convicted Rapist Trump.
She was sentenced to five years of probation and ordered to pay $5,000 in restitution.
That's the penalty for subverting American democracy?
It is when you then use the events you witnessed to testify and roll up the people who were directly and proximately responsible for that nightmare.
I do not think that her participation was so critical to the events as to mean "but for" her actions the plot wouldn't have existed. I do think that "but for" TFG and Guiliani's participation, those events never would have happened.
Seems fair to me that she gets a lighter sentence, and the plotters responsible for the entirety of the conspiracy get justice.
Also, she'll certainly never practice law again when all of this is over. Minor credit blemishes are enough to fail C&F in some places, can't see a state bar overlooking this.
Is there a specific legal definition for "disavow"? Because the lay definition is along the lines of "has no knowledge/approval of", which is a weird thing to say when also pleading guilty.
The definition I got (wherever Siri gets hers from) is “deny any responsibility or support for”. By pleading guilty she’s implicitly taking responsibility so I’m guessing the operative “or support” is working its ass off in this case.