this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
236 points (96.1% liked)

Space

9384 readers
141 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is the expected path the probability is going to take. Scott Manley made a great video on that.

Basically the area in which the asteroid is going to be includes the earth. When you shrink this area earth is going to take up more space, unless it left the cone. I.e. measurements increase the likelihood until they don't.

[–] padge@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Scott Manley... Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 111 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where do I donate to help the asteroid?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

3.1% odds are nothing to sneeze at. Ever played D&D?

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

XCom vets know what's about to happen

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It'll climb to 95% and then phase through the earth to somehow miss entirely?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mousefad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

roll for save vs. asteroid on a D30...

Balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sepix@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As if fascists and climate change wheren't enough. Here, have an asteroid!

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

What if it lands an the fascists and dust in the atmosphere cancels climate change for a couple of decades. Could that work?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Good.

Up those numbers.

We're awful.

[–] regrub@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago (26 children)

Is there any way we can speed it up?

[–] catharso@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Let's point all our magnets towards the sky!

🧲🌠

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 44 points 3 days ago (8 children)

This has been a good test of our planetary defense procedures, and will be an even better test on the off chance the probability resolves to 100%. I'm rooting for an impact trajectory, since we'd either get to see humanity's first real asteroid deflection or witness the largest asteroid impact in over a century. (Hopefully in the ocean or a sparsely populated area!)

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, I half expect that if we get a 100% chance, governments are going to see where it's going to land (sea/Africa) and decide it's not worth the spend/let's see what happens if we let it hit.

Really hope I'm wrong, but I don't have a lot of faith in humanity anymore.

[–] SamboT@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Why would we mitigate the asteroid if its cheaper to clean up after a non-consequential impact?

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To test our ability to stop it. If one was going to hit a major city, that's not the best situation to be trying something out for the first time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And hopefully it can be highly rich in rare minerals, so that when the ashes of WW3 finally settle down, at least the future generations of humans or not-human sapient entities will at least get something good out of the whole ridiculous mess we're currently in lol

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately, at the speed they travel, an asteroid will be vaporised in the impact. Whatever rare earths there are will be scatter as a fine powder over a large area.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

is this the aliens going "welp they elected Trump again time to press the reset button"

[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

It will be in 2032, so near the end of Trump's third term.

[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

first hit moscow and take an insane bounce and hit washington DC please. that's all I'm asking.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Mar-a-Lago would be a great choice.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Bruh the DC metro area is statistically one of the most anti Trump places in the US. Let's root for it to hit Maralago instead.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

A direct hit would be about the size of a fission nuclear bomb. Devastating for a city, but no regional or country-wide impacts, let alone globally

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not even a little global cooling?

As a treat?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If anything, it might get a tiny bit warmer

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

From the article

In a new update, the space agency has increased the chances of asteroid 2024 YR4 colliding with Earth, with the probability of impact rising to 3.1 per cent or one-in-32 odds of impact β€” the highest probability of a collision yet.

IE - 3%.

3% events happen all of the time!

The article stresses that this probability has been going up over the past year or so, which is likely neither here nor there, but I can totally understand how it’s alarming in a post-COVID world.

Slightly more likely than rolling two sixes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Don't threaten me with a good time

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago

Don’t look up

[–] vane@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How many people need to die before someone hits the Earth with a rock ?

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I just hope it’s bigger then they think.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί