this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
60 points (84.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35810 readers
1404 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Twitter isn't Twitter anymore can there be another Twitter?

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snorf@reddthat.com 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

One of those cans should be a call

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can edit titles on Lemmy! And short answer is no. Even though Musk isn't using the name Twitter for his social media platform, he still owns the rights to the name and the trademark, and can sue anyone using it.

[–] Snorf@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to know man, but I'm leaving the can.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you lose Trademarks if you haven't used or enforced them for a long while? the way copyright can enter public domain unless renewed and enforced?

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, but X is still using "Twitter." It takes an extended period of complete abandonment before you can petition to have the trademark canceled.

[–] u202307011927@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

and he ~~can~~ call sue

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Call a company can itself Twitter now? 🤔

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Can a company can itself...

To can or not to can....

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How many cans could a can call can if a can call could call cans?

[–] Narrrz@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how much chuck could a chuck-wood wood, if a chuck-wood would wood chuck?

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I may have to rethink my understanding of the English language

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Wait until you learn what "kuusi palaa" means in Finnish.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it would work as “if a can could call cans cans”

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just went with the one that was more satisfying to say and matched the original tongue twister

Edit: I am idiot

[–] curse4444@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

im high af and i read your title 5 times and had no idea wtf i read lmao

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

One mans can is another mans call

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

There's a Texas Hold'em Poker joke somewhere in here

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 28 points 1 year ago

No, because X would still own the Twitter name/brand/copyright.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To answer your question, no, because he hasn't given up the rights to the name.

But now I've got this song in my head: https://youtu.be/7SXWgC0SLCA?feature=shared

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Not the can can?

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't know. X probably still has rights to the Twitter name. Unless they give that up, no one can can themselves Twitter. In fact, why would you can yourself that in an age where that term is associated with nonsensical arguments? It's a form of bias. You might as well try canning yourself Subwoofer instead.

[–] wlsnt@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why would you

Because it's one of the most recognized names in the world, you'd get a boot of millions of views instantly just because

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing that the name has become tarnished thanks to Elon.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Disclaimer: IANAL, and this is not legal advice.

Trademark infringement is a civil matter. If you called your company Twitter, it would be up to the current holder(s) to issue a C&D, lawsuit, etc. If they do not protect their trademark as such, they can lose it. Which would be a very interesting scenario- Musk is very adamant on pushing his favorite letter. This would require them to state in legal filings that they still want and use the name Twitter. Undoubtedly this would hurt Musk's ego, and it's possible that he would force the matter to be dropped.

Also, trademarked names are not absolute. You can use them in contexts where consumers are unlikely to confuse the two. Apple Computer famously had to distance themselves from Apple Records. There's a Dell aluminum siding company near me. There's a Hershey ice cream brand that's unrelated to the famous chocolate company. While it's harder to make the claim when the word is unique nonsense, you could probably get away with a name like Twitter Landscaping.

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Interesting.

[–] scumola@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The new Twitter company could issue a C&D to the old Twitter because they're not actively using the trademark. I don't see why a new company couldn't call themselves twitter if they're willing to go through the court system to take it away.

[–] AmidFuror@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'm canning bullshit on those typos being accidental.