this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
63 points (88.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

37440 readers
1305 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just saw the post of some dude who said all Germans are racist because they don't have black people.

People like this just make me cringe. I also know some people who say they will only date a specific ethnicity like only white or only Asian people and I think it's very weird.

I wonder where this movement started where people overly obsess about this. Can't we already just treat people for who they are/their personality and not judge them by their skin color and also not prefer some ethnicities over others?

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

Germany does have black people though, e.g. Antonio Rudiger, a German footballer who plays for Real Madrid:

Antonio Rudiger, a German footballer, wearing the shirt of the German national football team.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago

its being inflamed by the billionaires meant to distract you from the real issues.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 5 points 15 hours ago

I basically see it as racism every time someone is treated differently because of the color of their skin. There's racism with bad intentions and racism with good intentions but it's all still racism. In my ideal world we'd care about skin color as much as we care about hair color now. Most of the attempts to "fix" racism by paying more attention to the ethnicity of people that's been coming from the left over the past years has just maken things worse and is one of the big reasons for Trump as well.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 7 points 17 hours ago
[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Even if we all had the exact same skin tone there woulda still be racists. They would just move onto hair color or eye color or nose width. Some people just have hate in their hearts and they will use any physical differences to lump people together.

Personally I'm with Morgan Freeman on the topic. Just stop talking about it. Stop talking about race. We are all humans. We all got struggles. Let's all get along as humans and work together.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Some people just have hate in their hearts and they will use any physical differences to lump people together.

Being skeptical of people looking different from you used to serve a purpose in our history. It no longer does but the bias can still be found in our biology. It's not that some "just are hateful people" - it's that they're human.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago

The follow up question then is, how do we deal with that as a species? If we assume that humans have tribalistic tendencies, I don't want to say inherent, but, deeply rooted? Can education and external pressure make it go away? Can we direct it into something else? It seems like sports teams with their fans is an outlet at least preferable to war, for example.

[–] Social_Discussion@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Exactly my views as well, love it!

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder where this movement started where people overly obsess about this. Can’t we already just treat people for who they are/their personality and not judge them by their skin color and also not prefer some ethnicities over others?

I'm gonna guess you're white. There are many reasons why people make race their identity. One of them is because OTHER people make it their identity. If you're just a normal person walking down the street, but other people only reduce you to "black person" or "asian person" or "gay person" or whatever then there's something in our nature that takes that on and reframes it into a positive, a strength. Most of the "something person" people I know didn't start caring about that, but other people reinforced it SOOOOOO much. Additionally, when your category is legislated at the government level, then you can't help but assume it's a main part of your identity. To the government and society, you ARE that person. When you need permission from the government just to exist, it is defining.

[–] Social_Discussion@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago

That's exactly what I think is fucked up, you're completely right. The fact that people force this on others and don't just view them as just another human especially when it's on a government level is really awful. But also the Internet often is full of racist stereotypes. I hope there will be some bigger movement some day that will change this drastically at least in first world countries.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just a warning, your question might be interpreted as violating rule 5:

Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

That said, I don't see why cringing about racism is controversial, if anything it's the majority view that racism is bad.

If you are genuinely interested in learning about where racism comes from, feel free to read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

Aristotle for example argued that non-Greek slaves innately lacked a will and thus depended on their Greek masters as rulers the way children depend on their parents (he made similar arguments justifying the supremacy of men over women). These views have a long history, and it's worth learning about. You might start with the culture you are in (not sure if you're from the U.S. or not) and read a few academic primers about race and the history of race in your culture.

You might also wonder what race is, and for philosophical questions about race I would start here: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/race/

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I give this a 50/50 being sea lioning. The reason being I thought this way when I was younger. I'm white and didn't understand why everything was so focused on race until I was an adult. I don't care about race that much, but everyone around me did and I thought it was weird. Once I was older and educated, I understood that it's FAR more complex than my kiddo brain could handle without some education.

[–] Social_Discussion@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago

Only proving that racism is learned and not something someone is born with

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 21 hours ago

yeah, I'm not really doubting OP's intentions, I'm just trying to clue them in to how others might see their post so they aren't surprised if it gets flagged

I think race issues were apparent to me as a young child, but it took the form of feeling insecure and unsure how to interact with racial minority peers of mine in school and so on, not wanting to make them feel uncomfortable but feeling fragile around them and thus accidentally introducing stigma. It was an awful feeling, and something that just didn't happen with other students.

[–] Social_Discussion@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Very interesting! I'm going to read into that.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Well, american culture making such a big deal about ethnicity even when "positive" did influence a lot.

I never understood why the N word is racist because of history, but then being black makes it fine to say. It's still linked to a racist background, but it seems like americans consider that minorities can never be or do anything racist.

And I mean, in 99% of cases the concept of ethnicity is (or at least is used in a way that is) purely racist. Apart from a few studies on genetic specificities, it has no purpose at all, and definitely no purpose in daily lives and governments.

What's weird is that no one with a sane mind would say that a woman saying "women are bitches and shouldn't be able to work" isn't misogynistic, but when it comes to racism people are making up exceptions left and right.

If you focus on ethnicity, chances are you are racist, no matter the justification you put behind it.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I just want to say that ethnicity is not necessarily related to genetics in any way, it's about your heritage and upbringing. A person can be born and raised in Japan without having indigenous parents. In this way, they are ethnically Japanese if they choose to identify with the culture they were raised in.

So it's not suddenly racist to appreciate someone's ethnicity. It's racist to assume someone's ethnicity based on how they look.

And what you say about ethnicity being irrelevant to the government is quite controversial. For example, there are various treaties in effect between colonizers and indigenous peoples. Do you think such treaties are not valuable because they are based on ethnicity?

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I think that being a colonizer is not something a government should be. So yes, definitely, such a treaty is bad.

A government should be treating people as equally as possible. Ethnicity only brings unnecessary division.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I never understood why the N word is racist because of history, but then being black makes it fine to say

Context.

I have the complexion of a brand new piece of printer paper, one of my friends who legit could have gotten a job as a Wesley Snipes impersonator constantly called me the n word. He called all his friends that, and eventually I used it in the same context he had towards me for like the 50th time that day without me even realize I was saying it.

It wasn't a big deal, but it's not like that magically gave me permission to say it anywhere at anytime.

I mean, it's 2025 man, there's white people all over who have been saying the n word. The context is what matters. I just don't get how someone could think it's a (pun intended) black and white issue.

Hell, the most popular rapper in America has been publicly complaining about how another black rapper says the n word. Flat out saying that it's not a race thing it's a culture thing. It was literally the outro to one of the biggest diss tracks of the biggest beefs in modern rap era.

https://genius.com/Kendrick-lamar-euphoria-lyrics

[–] Social_Discussion@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

That's precisely accurate! Great points

I never understood why the N word is racist because of history, but then being black makes it fine to say.

Lol I had a Black teacher that would not be happy if her Black students used the N word. (USA btw)

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the word "cringe" is cringe but

Re: i wonder where this movement started

Blacks, whites, men, women, Mexicans, and vegans once almost accomplished something with Occupy and few years ago and it scared the Powers that B so much that they've spent almost the past 20 years destroying social connections to make sure it never happens again

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I wonder where this movement started where people overly obsess about this

Evolution.

As a toddler you form your "in group" based on the people you see. Mostly that you are actually around, but also just exposed to on TV.

Anyone that you're not exposed to is "out group" and you can use conscious thinking as an adult to include others in your ingroup but when you get old and lose mental ability you'll fall back into "did I see people like that as a kid" distinction for "us" vs "them".

For the vast amount of human history, if you ran into a group of different looking humans, they were a competitor and you either boned them or killed them.

People want to act like 10,000 years of human society makes us better than other animals, but that's a blink of evolutions eye, we're still animals and if we're not socialized we're gonna act like animals.

Can’t we already just treat people for who they are/their personality and not judge them by their skin color and also not prefer some ethnicities over others?

We do that by integrating society and children's TV with integrated casts of diverse people.

Which is why conservatives and even some moderates opposed things like school busing and Sesame Street.

They're not picking random shit that doesn't matter, they're planning decades in advance to make sure the next generation can be manipulated into thinking along racial lines rather than realizing there's no just war except a class war.

Quick edit:

We can see it in modern day with the obsession of preventing kids from learning LGBTQ is a thing, they want kids to form their "us" group as just heterosexuals so that when that generation grows up they'll view anything LGTBQ as "them".

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Many societies around the world actually are a bit racist. Anti-racism is moreso a thing that started and was invented. Humans are just naturally racist until they become better educated and realise it's wrong.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Humans are just naturally racist

No they're not.

Like, I wrote an indepth explanation, you completely missed the details, and then posted a summary that's completely wrong...

[–] countrypunk@slrpnk.net 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There's a big difference between xenophobia and racism. The entire concept of race is a relatively new invention.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 21 hours ago

Probably depends how you define racism. Structured systemic racism is an invention.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel cringe about feeling “cringe”, but that’s probably just me.

[–] Social_Discussion@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well I'm in my 20's and that's how many of us communicate

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Fair enough - carry on!

[–] YamahaRevstar@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

A guy at work said to me:

"Did you know that Native Americans don't mind being called Indians?"

Oh, you polled thousands of people from all parts of the country?

I wanted to turtle into my shirt.

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe 2 points 13 hours ago

People actually have done that, and by a decent but not landslide majority (upper 60s%, IIRC), the original inhabitants of North America like the catch-all term: 'American Indian'. Halfway alluding to the other guy's reply, they actually do like to call attention to the ignorance that was put upon them upon first meeting. It's hardly their blunder to be embarrassed by, and that moniker has become part of their history. Has it not?

If you want to be truly proper, you'd have to get down to the nitty-gritty & list every single tribe ever. By name. And that doesn't work very well on a form when you're making people check & sort themselves into boxes.

...which brings me to the final, and most ironic point of it all. People insisting on using Native American & African American often fail to realize those titles were put upon those people by the goddamn United States Government. Yes, the same one that enslaved the blacks. The same one that drove the American Indians from their lands, hunted them for sport, and rounded them up into camps. After the mistreatment, the USG said, "Hmm, what should we call these people? Oh, I know. 'Native Americans' & 'African-Americans'." Now it's been baked into the cake for so long nobody even stops to question it, they insist upon it. Even if it's technically inaccurate in niche cases (like Jamaican Americans), or insensitive (being labeled by your conquerors).

...idk. Call me a romantic bumpkin, but I work with black men & women who haven't stepped a single foot in Africa. They eat cheeseburgers like I do, we drink from the same water fountains & use the same toilets, we shake hands. There's nothing African about them besides their genetics; they are Americans just like I am an American. They happen to be black. Idk too many American Indians around here, only some with very diluted, distant heritage.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 21 hours ago

Even if a majority if indigenous folks didn't mind the label, it's still a label born of ignorance. It's not like it becomes just OK because the surviving oppressed minority incorrectly labelled that way by the colonists are OK with it.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com -2 points 17 hours ago

Nope. You have my unpopular upvote