this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
125 points (95.0% liked)

politics

18933 readers
3733 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gaetz has worked with Johnson on the House Judiciary Committee for seven years, he told talk show host and former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon during an appearance on his show Wednesday.

House Republicans made Johnson the Speaker after three previous Republicans could not gather enough support after being named the nominee. Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) was kicked out of the job more than three weeks ago and the House had passed no bills from then until Johnson was elected.

“The swamp is on the run, MAGA is ascendant, and if you don’t think that moving from Kevin McCarthy to MAGA Mike Johnson shows the ascendance of this movement, and where the power of the Republican Party truly lies, then you’re not paying attention,” Gaetz said.

Gaetz spearheaded the effort to oust McCarthy earlier this month, citing a lack of trust and broken promises.

“We’re in the majority right now,” Johnson said after being sworn in as Speaker. “We’ve gone through a little bit of character building, and you know what it’s produced: more strength, more perseverance and a lot of hope.”


Seen article mentioned on The Hill, Rising:

Briahna Joy Gray and Robby Soave weigh in on Rep. Matt Gaetz's reaction to Speaker Mike Johnson's win of the Speaker's gavel.

Matt Gaetz: MAGA TAKEOVER Of GOP Is COMPLETE, PRAISES 'Sharp' Speaker Mike Johnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qws2yzbjv00

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crawley@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

He's absolutely right; it's a fundamentally Republican feature to allow an extremist minority to control everyone else. The electoral college gives republicans a huge advantage in presidential elections, for example, and now we see that the Freedom Caucus, a very small cadre of right wing extremists, can exert it's will over the entire 435-member Congress. Instead of compromise, a handful of wackos elected a guy who swore to "fight vigorously with the Democrats."

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I would've been content to see some more infighting followed by a moderate R elected, but the route they're currently taking will lead to long term devastation to the party and I'm here for it.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I keep hearing about these 'consequences' of which people speak, but I have yet to directly observe any.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, we did get a red premature-ejaculation instead of the red wave that historical trends and polling at the time expected us to receive in the last mid-terms.

But yeah, despite a completely obvious and open moral bankruptcy folks keep voting for them.

Even pre-Covid they have been dying faster though, so there's that.... https://scitechdaily.com/a-mortality-gap-republicans-are-dying-at-a-higher-rate-than-democrats/

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Based on historical trends, they should have outperformed democrats in the last midterms. They did not. The fact that the freedom caucus exists is a consequence of trump becoming the republican party. They never actually want to govern (they usually complain that government doesn't work and then slash government funding and power to make it a self fulfilling prophecy) but now they are actually incapable of governing because of how poisoned the party is.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I just hope we survive the short term devastation they do to the country in the mean time.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Yep, it's one of the first things I've seen him say that I agree with. It's just that he thinks it's a good thing and I think it's a horrific thing.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org -1 points 10 months ago

Do you have any update on this?

“We have just spoken with the DOJ and have been informed that they have concluded their investigation into Congressman Gaetz and allegations related to sex trafficking and obstruction of justice and they have determined not to bring any charges against him,” Gaetz’s lawyers, Marc Mukasey and Isabelle Kirshner, said in a statement.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/15/politics/matt-gaetz-justice-department/index.html

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) told Real America’s Voice that Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) was sent on a mission from God to make Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) Speaker.

Said Burchett: “If you can’t see the hand of God in this, then you’re just not looking.”

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, people in office are religious.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's fine, but do they all think a man in the sky controls all things?

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Religion tends to have that effect on people, be it their god(s) or text.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com -2 points 10 months ago

Do you want an imaginary man in the sky running your government?