this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
13 points (71.0% liked)

politics

20473 readers
3317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Jamie Dimon needs to be done.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Jamie Dimon is a financial terrorist.

Cocaine and sex trafficking are just some of the specialties of JP Morgan.

Ship seized in $1.3 billion cocaine bust is owned by JP Morgan Chase

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/ship-seized-in-1-3-billion-cocaine-bust-is-owned-by-jp-morgan-chase/

JP Morgan Chase has reached settlements with the US Virgin Islands and former executive Jes Staley to resolve lawsuits over its alleged dealings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. It will pay $75m to the territory, which alleged the bank facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking ring.Sep 26, 2023

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66925934.amp

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Jamie Dimon saying a thing is a good idea is how you know you're being fucked in the ass, raw.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Not as inefficient as the ungodly sums of money these parasites have sucked out of the US economy to fund their obscenely wealthy lifestyles and attacks on democracy to suck more money out of tax payers by gutting our social programs so they can give the top 1% yet another handout.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago

Janie Dimon needs to meet my boy, Louie G

[–] dan@lemmy.i.secretponi.es 8 points 4 days ago

Didn't JP Morgan accept a bailout from the "inefficient US government" in 2008 because they let greed get in the way of sustainability? I'm pretty sure they did.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

 Yeah sure government’s inefficient, and too big to make changes, but making horrible decisions without any supporting evidence to indicate that your cuts are actually going to save money is also inefficient.

If somebody had posted a research study indicating exactly which positions needed to be eliminated and then was transparent about exactly how much money we would save and came up with a plan about how the work was going to be done after cutting said jobs. I don’t think anybody would complain as much 

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago