this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
448 points (99.3% liked)

politics

21416 readers
5135 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A 99.7% accuracy rate gutted for profit? Efficiency isn't the goal; it's exploitation.

🐱

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I now think of it as MOE - Ministry of Efficiency, in the 1984 sense.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

Big Brother would be proud.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Aaah first I really thought, well, there it is, they began the killing. I'm glad that's not what happened

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

I don't know, maybe that's what we need to wake tf up some boomers

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's weird to me how much some people have internalized the politics of austerity this quickly.

The economy was humming under Biden. There was no emergency, no indicator that we have to "tighten our belts".

Then Bronzo enters the office and fElon with his MOE (Ministry of Efficiency) and all they want to do is cut everything. Even in the MOE Cinematic Universe....how do they possibly justify any of this shit? They plan on cutting taxes at the same time, so it's not about balancing anything.

What's worse, is that I now seeing lots of people on the left saying that government is bloated and should be cut, but done with precision. WTAF?

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

This is a great way to create jobs for the SS recipients. /s

[–] chris@lemm.ee 88 points 1 week ago (9 children)

So, when Social Security gets gutted, we’re all getting the money we put in back, right? …right?!

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, of course! As long as you make at least $100M a year, all investments will be returned as tax breaks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Musk has been spouting how Social Security is a scam and how tariffs will make up for it. Basically, kiss your social security pension away and just hope a substitute pops up - although it will likely be in the form of "get a check if you don't criticize us" now. DOGE is an excuse to Big Data everything from every department and process it through AI, including knowing your political association.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago

Hilarious.

“Social security is a scam” = “I’m taking your retirement money for myself”

“Tariffs will make up for it” = “As a bonus fuck you, 20% tax on everything you need to survive”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (60 children)

The American Prospect, which first reported earlier this week that Acting SSA Commissioner Leland Dudek was weighing staff cuts of up to 50%

Congratulations protest non voters, this is what you voted for.

load more comments (59 replies)
[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I work with two people that are within a year of retiring and they are absolutely ecstatic that Trump was doing this to Social Security, as well I work with people that are in their early 20s that are exactly the same happy that this is happening and thinking that they will all become super wealthy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

It's weird how these people seemingly learned nothing from history. I remember hearing from baby boomers (as a Gen Xer) that they would not get to collect Social Security by the time they retired, since the Silent Generation/Greatest Generation were going to use it all up, that it wasn't funded, it was a pyramid scheme, etc...and they just want "their" money so they could gamble on the stock market with it instead. Naturally, I heard a lot of Gen X pick up and parrot a lot of this same bullshit narrative, with probably even MORE zeal since there were a whole lot more baby boomers than there were Gen X. Turns out Gen Y was quite large, but that didn't stop people from repeating this, even if it was pointed out that any kind of "problem" was easily fixed if you lifted the cap on SS.

Rinse, repeat....and it's the exact same shit. Now apparently fucking Gen Z is saying it too. You just know that eventually the anti-intellectual dipshits will get their way in making everything awful. It's a whole lot easier to break stuff than to build it...

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My redneck trailer cock American family has absolutely nothing saved for retirement, but they think that social security tax took all of their money and gave it to people who are cheating the system pretending to be disabled

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago

I hear the same bs too. I work with a few hardcore Mormons who say the same thing, its bizarre.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›