this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
986 points (99.5% liked)

Buy European

2191 readers
3551 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Matrix Chat

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

!buyfromeu@feddit.org

Buying and Selling:

!flohmarkt@lemmy.ca

Boycott:

!boycottus@lemmy.ca


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 10 points 43 minutes ago

The irony of elon calling anyone else "small" is hilarious....

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 4 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

So Hughes-Net & ViSat aren't a thing ? They're satellite internet companies probably based in Europe, but I could be wrong. (I probably butchered the names)

Also, how rich of Elon, a man whose existence is propped up by government funding to bark & bite the hands that feed them

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

Put them down like rabid dogs.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 14 points 1 hour ago

Rubio shouted at Musk, so poor Elon took it out on a foreign country's government official and called him "little man"

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Starlink is just putting up cubesats with basic programming variations. The EU space agency can easily provide a competitive service that values freedom and democracy.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 5 minutes ago
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hubris. This is hubris.

Nemesis will follow, motherfucker, the Moires don't fuck around.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

BYD is already eating Tesla's lunch and I'm waiting for another to replace SpaceX.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Oligarchs used to act the part, and have the appearance of being "classy".

Now Oligarchs are just a bunch of 4chan users.

Wtf is: "Be quiet, small man"

That's not an elegant way of speaking.

These people are supposed to be "upper class"?

🤣

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago

Really dude ?? 4Chaners are smarter than Elon, Elon is the definition of rock-bottom

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

That's how dumb shit argue on the Internet. Ad hominem.

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Disgusting. Why the FUCK would you talk to our allies this way? The guy is a polish government official.. (I mean obviously I know why, Elon is a megalomaniac).

"Small man"??? WTF. I hate it.

[–] zonnewin@feddit.nl 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You wouldn't talk to your allies that way. Which once again makes it clear that the current US administration no longer sees Europe as allies.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago

America as whole sees you as meatshields against the Russian bear

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 42 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

If America was a real country this guy would've immediately been removed from any and all companies he runs.

Does SpaceX not have a board?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

SpaceX bggest customer by far is the US gvernment. Obviously that is run by Musk, so they will not fire him.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

But why? Why did t NASA do this. Instead government funded it and a private citizen controls it and gets all the benefits.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

America is a bastion of capitalism, now you figure out the rest, you are smart.

I think you answered your own question.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 12 points 6 hours ago

They’re all his pawns

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Don't let the fascists fool you, there are alternatives to Starlink. Eutelsat in France, Telesat in Canada and Inmarsat in the UK, just to name a few examples.

[–] bradd@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Why is starlink being used, do you know?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 38 points 7 hours ago

It’s faster, cheaper, and on the tech side more reliable (definitely not politically reliable though).

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Now, I don't know, but I would assume its the latency. Starlink has a (impressively) low ping of < 100ms, while existing alternatives usually have 600ms+. Now, that's only relevant if they are using it for stuff like flying drones.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 11 points 6 hours ago

I think you'd notice half a second even just browsing the Web.

[–] learningduck@programming.dev 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

My guess is better coverage and latency with its sheer number of satellites.

They use low earth orbit, which require them to use more satellites, but lowered latency.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Technically, and this is purely semantics, coverage is the major downside to starlink. They are faster, though.

The coverage of satellites has an exponential factor of the distance of that satellite to earth. If you had the satellite further out then its signal could reach a wider area before being cut off by the curvature of the earth. However, as the distance increases, so does latency.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

TBH I think any more low orbit telecom satellite arrays than we already have are just going to become a huge problem in the following decades.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago

Starlink is already being a problem currently, and it's not even fully deployed

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This has been commented before.

Starlink flies at a very low altitude, meaning relatively high atmospheric drag, and a very short period of time before their sats deorbit if they go dead, less than ten years.

It's nowhere near the problem everyone makes it out to be.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Until we find out that not nearly as much burns up on re-entry as assumed and they've been raining carcinogens for decades.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

I didn't say it wasn't a problem at all.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Official statemens claim they run for about 5 years, deorbit anywhere, and do NOT always burn up in reentry.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 8 points 6 hours ago

But what SpaceX does is so cool, and for the greater good of the humanity!

/s

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 40 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This post has more upvotes on Lemmy than Reddit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It's time for Europe to finally get their own solutions.

[–] Renohren 19 points 9 hours ago

It's called One Web by Eutelsat. Same latency and reliability, but less Mb/s about 70 Mb/s (and does it matter much for the few Kb packets to relay small amounts of data?).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 55 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

"My starlink system". He's literally a walking, talking "you made this? I made this" meme.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xye@lemm.ee 30 points 9 hours ago

Ah, the full Hitler, a bold move let’s see how it plays out.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

Elon is an absolute clown there are alternatives they just aren’t as robust at this time.

[–] adm@lemm.ee 252 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (14 children)

When the war was turning in Ukraine's favor and they were about to push into Russia, he shut it off and crippled their counter offensive. I remember. Fuck Elon and fuck starlink.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Which is why Starlink needs to be confiscated and managed by NATO. Somebody has to operate it, and it should be an entity who is on the side of Freedom amd Democracy.

[–] starman@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

It's not that easy to confiscate sattelites

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›