this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1224 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

7064 readers
3932 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stomata@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Why on earth these people didn't vote?

[–] DTguess@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

Compulsory voting in Australia is looking good

[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago

I'll take whoever this "Did not vote" instead please

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It's something to keep in mind.

Don't alienate those 36.32%. I'm sure some of us have strong feelings about their choices, but at the end of the day they outnumber Democrats and Republicans each by quite a bit. If you want to see change you are going to have to convince some of them to join you. This goes for elections and this goes for revolutions.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Turnout is low when votes don't matter and voters get suppressed when their vote does matter. This is working as designed.

[–] Lumbardo@reddthat.com -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I would say that the Republicans winning the popular vote made it a pretty decisive victory.

[–] Ferus42@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Winning by less than 1% is not decisive.

Did you somehow miss that the meme is about the people who chose to vote for a third party, or not at all?

[–] palencharizard@lemm.ee 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This is misleading.

According to those stats, the majority of people voted for someone other than Harris as well.

The real takeaway here is large percentage of people that don't vote.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 31 minutes ago

Harris isn't claiming a mandate.

[–] despicable 14 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Pffffft, the rest of you lot knew what was at stake, the lazy twats who couldn't be bothered to save their own nation by exercising their RIGHT to vote aren't off the hook. I've literally started to cringe when hearing Americans in public (I live in the UK) because in my mind subconsciously there's a high chance that person is dumb as fuck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mr2meows@pawb.social 2 points 4 hours ago

trump talked about how elon knows those voting computers so well

[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

American democracy and freedom are fucked. But I don't blame those 36% of non-voters. These people were INSPIRED to give up on politics.

It's the media environment. Political coverage fucking sucks by design. Left populism is too interesting to be given air time, too much of a threat to the people who fund the parties and own the media. Politics used to be interesting. Politicians used to say things, now they just run out the clock with white noise.

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I mean no

In an election between Bush and Kerry (the guy who lost 2004 election) or something like that then yes. People can be annoyed or just too busy to vote.

This election was perfectly clear that the future of US democracy was at stake and more than 1/3 of the voters decided to not show up. They decided that they were fine not choosing and as such fine with either option. I mean even if the choice was between Trump and a dog, the dog should have won by a landslide. 4 years of nothing would have been miles better than the decades that US is going back.

This presidency is already catastrophic and it barely even started.

I don’t even know how the US and the world can handle 4 years of this shit at this pace.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 10 points 8 hours ago

In conclusion 68% let Trump win or directly voted for him.

[–] scifun@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

Both times Trump won was when a woman was running against him. The only time he lost was to a white old man.

USA is just sexist and Americans better come to terms with it rather than making up random reasons.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If only things were that simple. Humans love to focus on just one reason, but when dealing with a population of voters you have to use statistics to understand anything about whats going on. I'm sure sexism was a factor but theres so much more than that.

[–] hikuro93@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

While your logic does have a point, and there's no shortage of sexists out there, I must also state that both Clinton and Harris were horrid candidates as well, and both followed a democrat president the people were starting to/were done with.

Not only that, but both times Trump preyed on what the people were desperate to hear: "Better living conditions, lower prices" and all that. This was mainly the illusion of choice between two evils, and they chose the one that seemed to be the lesser one. The one who appeared to be "more honest" and despite being a nepo-baby called out and criticized all other rich people.

The issue is the system itself, and the fact that voters choose their candidates like celebrities or their sports team. See Harris making her campaign way more about celebrity endorsement than commiting to actual societal issues. She was never gonna win like that, and even if she did, she would still be a bad president. Not worse for sure, now that we all are seeing current Trump starting all sorts of conflicts and trying to become a dictator, but still a bad president.

The US can elect a female president. But so far the options picked for that were absolutely horrid, and I know there's several good and competent female leaders who are both democrats and republicans. Sadly they have too much common sense or lean too much to the centre to be taken seriously by the ones who want to create a spectacle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 hours ago

Correlation is not causation. We elected Obama who was one of the youngest presidents in US history first term. Also he was Black. I'm not saying the country is sexist, but I am saying both the female candidates that made it the general election, ran on dog shit platforms of "more of the same"

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 12 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Basically if Tim Walz was the presidential candidate he probably would have won.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

68.1% of US citizens are bloody idiots.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Guess why some of these people didn't even bother to vote.

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Well, in 1933 when the NSPD came to power they had 43% of the seats in parliament (I haven't found the percentage of the total votes but I imagine it was much less). That did not prevent them from repeating the elections at the end of that year and getting more than 90%, you can imagine how.

Even a part of popular culture accepts that they came to power by winning elections and the German people feel and felt the shame that they came to power by democratic means, which is only half true.

I feel sorry for the American people, but they elected this team under the same rules of democracy as their previous presidents. To claim now that his election was not democratic is to distort the facts.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Was there not redistricting and voters removed from voter lists in higher numbers this time around?

E: not trying to be a dick, genuinely that was my understanding

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago

This is why we need ranked choice voting

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 10 hours ago

"my vote won't change anything", "i don't like any of them", "that won't affect me", call leopards for those 36%

[–] TranslateErr0r@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Stop this bs. Rules are set before the game begins.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 21 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

I need to mention that the reason why 20 million fewer voters voted is. Because of the massive voter suppression that was done prior to the 2024 election. So many people were purged from voters rolls and many polling places were closed it wasn't funny.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DelusionalCyberDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Let's be honest here, both parties are full of shit. During Biden term 3500 students had their visa revoked due to anti Zionist protests, let alone canary mission bullshit.

And do not forget about insider trading and that both parties are funded by private companies

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 hour ago

And Trump wants to deport 20 million people, yea, exactly the same.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

BoTh SiDeS!!

They are not the same. One is an open Nazi party

load more comments
view more: next ›