this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1232 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

7064 readers
3916 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

pfff... he won twice. if americans would want a real democracy that wouldnt have happened.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 13 hours ago

Yeah. American here. It’s generally the case that the president gets votes from a minority of the population. Nothing new there. Unfortunately those of us who live here can see that the support for this monster is very real.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

It turns out politics is very complex and difficult to manage.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 9 points 12 hours ago

Not a mandate, but voter's apathetic acceptance.

[–] Silar@infosec.pub 21 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

How gross it is, considering what was in the line that so many didn’t vote. Also I bet the duck he cheated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DelusionalCyberDuck@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Let's be honest here, both parties are full of shit. During Biden term 3500 students had their visa revoked due to anti Zionist protests, let alone canary mission bullshit.

And do not forget about insider trading and that both parties are funded by private companies

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ithorian@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thats how elections work everywhere in the world... Wtf are you talking about?

[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

*How First past the post elections work

Places with proportional representation have parliaments with representatives from a wide range of parties that have to cooperate with each other rather than constantly undermine each other.

[–] sinnsykfinbart@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago (9 children)

Those who didn't vote, who thought their vote didn't matter, that no matter which politician gets elected to whatever office.... they're complicit.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 31 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (17 children)

The only significantly statically impactful group of "non voters" is the population that was unable to or inconvenienced heavily by voting.

Meaning the major majority of voters that didn't vote were either unable to because of other obligations (work, childcare, etc) with a small subset of that being people that were no motivated enough to deal with the inconvenience of visiting a poll line (4hours in line) after a 10 hour shift.

These are the vast vast majority of people that did not show up. Beyond that an even smaller percentage was the "protest voters' that even if 100% of which went to Harris she still would have lost.

I guess I just want to say "in conclusion" that the vast majority of voters that didn't vote were giving you your Starbucks or your Taco Bell.

I think we should spend less time blaming voters and more time being critical of the politicians and party that gives zero reason for the working class to "risk" their shift for.

No one's gonna "risk a shift" for the policies and messaging that Harris communicated. You don't get people to "risk their shift" for voting for a lesser evil.

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Sometimes i get the feeling that voting on a tuesday is working as expected: to keep working an poor people from voting...

Germany has voting per defintion only on sundays, and (at least where i live) the voting booths are everywhere. You can vote either per mail, or from 8:00 to 18:00 at a booth, and i never had to wait in a line to vote, and i'm in my 40s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] parricc@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Or suppressed. I'll give some anecdotal examples. I have a friend that lives in a major metropolitan area with over 2.6 million people. When he applied to get a photo ID (he lost his previous one and needed a new one), the soonest appointment available for the entire metropolitan area was 3 months out. That's just for the appointment to apply for the ID, not actually receiving the ID. You are required to have a photo ID to vote. Then, voter registration in itself must also be completed at least a month before an election. Now, let's talk about the process of actually voting. I've personally stood in line for over 6 hours to vote. A lot of the people waiting in line had to leave to pick up their kids and other things. If you don't pick up your kids from school or daycare at very specific times, there are serious penalties. While I was waiting, there must have been at least 40 people in front of me that had to leave before voting. Many of them had waited in line for over 4 hours. For most people, waiting in line is the only way to vote. Only the elderly and disabled qualify to vote by mail. Make no mistake, voter suppression is very effective, and it is implemented specifically in areas that vote against what the ruling party wants. In Trump leaning areas, the lines were no longer than a two minute wait if they existed at all. Trump never would have won either election if it wasn't for voter suppression.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

The most complicit are the genocidal wackos who nominated a cop/prosecutor that campaigned to the cheyneys.

Nobody should be shamed into voting for trash.

[–] Retropunk64@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

If you live in a blue state and didn't vote, how are you complicit?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago

This is true of every election except maybe one.

Nobody always wins. The "winner" is always elected by a tiny minority. It's a fundamentally corrupt system. Always has been. Literally concocted by genocidal slavers.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Let's get a count of all of the votes that were tossed due to targeted voter registration purges.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AynRandLibertarian@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Also 6 million suppressed votes say: Kamala won!

[–] Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee 28 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (10 children)

So 68.1% of the American public are complicit. Worse than I thought TBH. Fuck.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Complicit with genocide? That's everybody who voted actually.

[–] Retropunk64@reddthat.com 6 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, no, that's not how that works. We've got the electoral college, remember? There were 20 states that went blue. Any additional votes to Harris in those states wouldn't have made Trump win less, refraining to vote in those states ultimately didn't matter. You need to look at the percentage of people that didn't vote in states that went red. But I get it, its easier to blame everyone who didn't vote than to use critical thought.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›