this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
156 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlights: The White House on Monday issued veto threats against two GOP-led House appropriations bills expected to come up for a vote this week as lawmakers seek to avoid a government shutdown in November.

The House bills would cut Department of Transportation funding by $7 billion compared to fiscal 2023 levels, $1.2 billion from HUD funding compared to 2023 levels, and nearly $4 billion from EPA funding compared to 2023 levels.

In both cases, the White House argued the bills put forward by Republicans in the House undercut an agreement reached by administration officials and GOP lawmakers in May on spending as part of negotiations to raise the debt limit.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Maybe get rid of the fake-ass TSA. Those security-theater police academy rejects serve absolutely no purpose at all and cost us 10 billion a year.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Whoa whoa whoa - those x-rays and cavity searches are the closest thing I get to healthcare.

[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe get rid of the fake-ass TSA.

I heard on the radio this morning that.. Philadelphia's airport, I believe, is now allowing passengers to have people wait at the gate with them again. We haven't seen that in decades, it gives me hope the TSA will one day be a thing of the past.

[–] FruitfullyYours@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You've always been able to get a gate pass if you're assisting another traveler.

[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not assisting, just hanging out with them until they leave.

[–] FruitfullyYours@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure on the requirements for everyone else, but my kids often fly alone and I take them to the gate and just chill for an hour or two.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, keep paying them, but have their work severly reduced: life mobility program that doesn't negatively affect people as much. Sunset after like a year or 2 when a lot of the people at TSA can have used that free money to get into other jobs and still not hassle me in my flights

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Transition them from passenger annoyance to passenger assistance.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That too, our current system is obnoxious, and seemingly doesn't actually give us better security.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In both cases, the White House argued the bills put forward by Republicans in the House undercut an agreement reached by administration officials and GOP lawmakers in May on spending as part of negotiations to raise the debt limit.

That's cute that they think any of them care about that, and that half of them won't call it an outright lie because their base will believe it.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The important thing is the GQP doesn't have the votes in either chamber to overcome a veto. And passing legislation that they know will be veto'd is the same as doing nothing.

It's worse than nothing since they're wasting time and resources.

But that's the point.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

A veto on an appropriation bill puts the shutdown directly on Biden though.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not cut Homeland Security and DOD spending? There is so much bloat there.

Of course, any representative to bring that up would instantly be called unpatriotic.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

same reason why TSA is not cut ....

if anything happens after ... it will be political suicide

So we might as well just keep shoveling money into the bottomless pit that is the MIC...

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The equivalent to a parent never letting their kids do anything because something might happen.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago

It's funny how MAGA bullshit is just warmed over Tea Party bullshit

[–] Klypto@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

DoT has seen an explosive increase in budget by 66% since 2019. I am not convinced that a 3% cut to stem the deficit is devastating.

I don't deny that American transportation and logistics are aging and need reform but this economic and high interest climate doesn't seem like the best time to go all in.