this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
918 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
5001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Curmudge_john@lazysoci.al 95 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

We know that Teslas sometimes just catch fire on their own.

We also know that sometimes Tesla drivers will set their cars on fire themselves on purpose. Because of that...

We also know that Elon has a backdoor into all Teslas.

Now ask yourself which is more likely, the woke liberal crybabies actually causing violence or a drug addled and politically embattled CEO of a company that lost 50% of its value in the past 3 months creating a false flag to villainize the left and get insurance to cover damage to the vehicles he can't sell?

/s (kind of)

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 55 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Didnt the Nazi party burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the other party?

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They blamed it on the communist party, yes. There were 8 parties represented in the Reichstag at the time though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

Given Elons history, it's definitely possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 71 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Insurance fraud due to slow sales

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

perfect. let's see if all tesla dealerships do it

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 221 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

In posts on X following the incident, Tesla CEO Elon Musk called the incidents “terrorism” and said the company “just makes electric cars and has done nothing to deserve these evil attacks.”

OK buddy.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 90 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

The cars suck, but he's right that the company hasn't done anything to deserve this. He's the one who chose to make himself the face of Tesla, though, so however people feel about him, they'll feel about any business he owns.

Terrorism, though? Hardly. It's protest. He's the one doing terrorism by dismantling the government.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago

The cars are poorly designed to the point of being dangerous. They deserve it a little.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 24 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (24 children)

Terrorism, though? Hardly.

Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature

Pretty much the definition of terrorism. Doesn't necessarily make it wrong.

That's what was so terrifying about the Patriot Act for so long.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 14 hours ago (24 children)

Violent, criminal acts

Property damage is not violence and nonviolent protests are not terrorism. They will claim it is. They are lying.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Gonna disagree with the anarchist viewpoint because physical damage to inanimate objects can still cause PTSD, battered spouse syndrome with enough incidents over time, etc. It's the threat of danger that matters.

Just because it doesn't fit your ideological view doesn't mean people are lying by looking at it differently

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 26 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (10 children)

Yes, but that definition also defines... basically all the most heinous things that Trump and those around him have done in the last... 5 years, lets say? ... as terrorism.

Remember CPAC, 2022?

... kinda speaks for itself.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 31 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

The board needs to remove Elon today.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 hours ago

the board are his handpicked toadies that have him a bonus despite tesla losing money

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

yep. I don't get why they haven't. He's tanking their shit badly.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

They just paid fucking 60 billion dollars to him to keep him from quitting. Maybe a smidge of sunk cost fallacy.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Good. Let them drown with their sinking ship. They enabled his power grab in the first place and decided something as perverted and absurd as granting a single man $60 billion. Let this be a lesson in history books.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Man, if I had the poor luck/foresight to have purchased a Tesla earlier, I would be driving like the politest mofo in existence these days.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'd set it on fire and make an insurance claim.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 11 hours ago

Those damn leftists!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

they should amend this Wikipedia article to include teslas https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_combustion

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 23 points 14 hours ago

Can't believe the Insurrection Act is gonna be used because of homie's swasticars

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 43 points 16 hours ago

I have never, and will never, see anyone vandalize a Tesla. 🙈

[–] db2@lemmy.world 65 points 17 hours ago

Oh no. Anyway..

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

Don't destroy Tesla cars, destroy the brand. Destroying Teslas means there's fewer Teslas and that makes them more valuable/reduces the flooding of the market caused by people selling their cars. The goal is to annihilate Elon's purchasing power to stop him from using it to implementing fascist governments around the world.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

I have zero evidence Musk ordered the Tesla vandalism. Which, coincidentally, is exactly how surprised I'd be to find out he had.

[–] mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago

Great way to get rid of rotting inventory and recoup costs through insurance.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 35 points 17 hours ago

I didn't see nuffin

[–] ugtug@lemm.ee 6 points 12 hours ago

Tesla just likes building things that spontaneously catch on fire. 🤷‍♂️

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›