156
submitted 8 months ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

TL;DR: Norway subsidised electric cars a lot, that money went to the rich more than the poor, and left them with less money to spend on transit which delivers better outcomes for cities.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LennethAegis@kbin.social 48 points 8 months ago

“Most Norwegian cities now have more of a car-centric, American approach toward transportation than a multi-modal, European one,”

That's a sad sentence to read, I always assumed Norway was like Sweden with amazing public transportation as well.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 44 points 8 months ago

I think this is a failure of imagination on the part of the author. Norway is, on a whole, much more rural; a large portion of the population lives in small towns and villages in areas with difficult terrain (think fjords), where public transport beyond a bus is impractical due to population densities.

The public transport in Oslo and Bergen are fantastic - Norway's only two large cities. Keeping in mind that over a quarter of the population of the entire country lives in these two, it's not as bad as it sounds.

[-] LennethAegis@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago

I see, that makes sense. I appreciate the lesson in Norway's infrastructure.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I live in Oslo, and that's not true. Oslo probably has one of the best public transit systems in the world, at least relative to its population. I never use any form of car, personal or taxi, I don't even own a driving license, and I can easily get anywhere I want to go.

[-] legofreak@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago

As soon as you leave the city though, you're having a problem. Bicycle infrastructure is basically non-existent, cars heavily impeding buses - at least where I live - which delays them all the time and centralised bus hubs, which means that you always have to go to the bus hub first, change bus lines and then go to your destination.

This is also my biggest problem with the metro in Oslo. If you live slightly outside of Oslo but still along the metro line, the only way to travel perpendicular to the metro lines is often to take the metro towards the city, change lines and go back almost the same direction you came from.

[-] Kanda@reddthat.com 2 points 8 months ago

You can take the bus to and from school and then there's also one more bus back from town at like 1900. So unless you're in school you get a car

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 41 points 8 months ago

E-bikes and infrastructure would have been a cheap and effective alternative for those subsidies as well.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 8 months ago

or like, electric mopeds

at least here in sweden like 90% of the population is within easy moped range of their daily business

[-] brewery@feddit.uk 5 points 8 months ago

I am really coming around to the fact that mopeds should be more common. The trouble is, it feels dangerous until car/van/trucks reduce in number, which is a catch-22.

I am thinking of getting one for my commute as just started a new job where it is possible to go on public transport but takes twice as long and lots of changes. Its just awkward placement really rather than the lack of transport, as have to criss cross. It does blow my mind how everyone is driving around tanks just for one person to travel (as cars have gotten noticeably bigger), it just doesn't make sense!

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

a good step in the right direction is moped cars, small 2-seaters that legally qualify as mopeds.

[-] DAT@feddit.de 16 points 8 months ago

so it's not the "electric" part that's the problem in norway

it's still better than combustion engines

stupid headline!

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago

It's not the cars being electric that's the problem, but their approach to electric cars and seeing them as a solution is.

[-] DAT@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

yeah, I get that.

I have no problem with the article itself - the headline is still stupid though.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 12 points 8 months ago

Clickbait headline, and stupid article. At no point are they making the claim that EVs are worse than combustion engines. The author posits that bicycles and walking are even more climate friendly than driving a car of any kind (duh). This entire article could be replaced by the sentence, "We should keep building trams and bike lanes in the EV era".

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago

The point is that the money spent on electric car subsidies went mostly to more wealthy people and took money away from investing in things like better public transport.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 8 points 8 months ago

Fair enough, I guess. But seems like a zero-sum-game attitude, especially given Norway’s stark urban/rural divide. Certainly Oslo should be preferring mass transit, but out in the many rural villages of the fjord-laden countryside, where density precludes mass transit, EV subsidies seem appropriate.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Norway’s muscular EV push has garnered headlines in outlets like the New York Times and the Guardian while drawing praise from the Environmental Defense Fund, the World Economic Forum, and Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

Worse, the EV boom has hobbled Norwegian cities’ efforts to untether themselves from the automobile and enable residents to instead travel by transit or bicycle, decisions that do more to reduce emissions, enhance road safety, and enliven urban life than swapping a gas-powered car for an electric one.

The federal government now offers tantalizing rebates to Americans in the market for an electric car, but nothing at all for more climate-friendly vehicles like e-bikes or golf carts (nor a financial lifeline for beleaguered public subway and bus systems).

“The argument is to make the tax system more fair,” said transportation state secretary Kroglund, “and not give benefits for things that are unnecessary for the transition to EVs.” As a result of the new policies, Norwegian sales of some high-end EVs, like the enormous Chinese Hongqi SUV, have collapsed.

The national government’s decision to subsidize electric cars but not e-bikes makes no sense from a climate perspective, although the United States Congress made the same mistake when it passed the Inflation Reduction Act last year.

But if local initiatives aren’t matched with supportive federal policies, Norway’s experience suggests that an influx of electric vehicles can hinder efforts to escape the automobile’s urban stranglehold.


The original article contains 2,849 words, the summary contains 236 words. Saved 92%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Coal powered cadillacs.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
156 points (92.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9495 readers
220 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS