this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
41 points (81.5% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
118 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wombatsignals@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Below 110K. Still on the right track but not proof of room temp superconductor yet.

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

110K (-163C, -262F) is still a significant improvement in cryo temperatures required for superconductivity. It no longer requires liquid helium temperatures for things like MRI magnets. So even if this is not a "holy grail" room temperature SC- it still enables the use of much cheaper commodity cryogenics like liquid nitrogen for use in scientific and industrial superconductors.

[–] flux@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

It still loses to HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+6 with Tc = 133–138 K at normal air pressure, though. (I assume it's normal air presure as the article doesn't say the pressure for it, while it refers to some others as high-pressure ones.)

Maybe LK-99 still has other benefits, such as not using mercury.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The more independent tests come out the less it's looking like this is a superconductor. There might still be something interesting going on here, but I'm becoming skeptical of the original claims myself.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, at least not at room temperature. But it still seems like it might be an incremental upgrade to what we have today.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago
[–] weew@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

honestly i'd be happy with a LN2 superconductor that works for MRI.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Isn't rebco tape already a decent candidate for that, and much further along in development pipelines?

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=bs-bigSXXeM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago
[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lets-fucking-go

-163C is still pretty cold, but at least it is superconducting