Can someone tell me if I am wrong.
Would this not set a precedent, if the Supreme court agrees with the White House, that if one man can be "wrongly deported" this gives the White House and ICE the ability to "wrongly deport" anyone they don't like since we don't have to bring them back?
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
211 points (99.5% liked)
politics
25248 readers
2014 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yep, it would be ceding habeas corpus. It would effectively agree that anyone secretly kidnapped out of the country and handed to another authoritarian state was a totally legal and cool end run around the Constitution.
If the Supreme Court agrees to this, it's knocking a pretty huge block of the foundation out of our democracy.
Basically.
A temporary stay by one justice does not create a legal precedent. Whatever the full supreme court rules in this case will create a legal precedent.
The Justice Department told the Supreme Court that ordering officials to return the man is “unprecedented”
Funny that they're fine with the unprecedented deportation of innocent people to life imprisonment in savage foreign prisons without due process ...
And let that be a LESSON to all you LIBTARDS! If Trump doesn't LIKE YOU he can Send You to an EL SALVADOR PRISON with NO RECOURSE!
-Soon to be Illegally Homeless Law and Order White Republicans!
I hope, he's not already been kashoggied.
dude's been in there for weeks now; he's going to end up with psychological trauma at the very least and his family is going to pay the price for it.
In this case, I think the morality around leaving him there is more important than a power struggle over what the courts can and can't tell the president to do.
Hell... Trump COULD try to get him returned, but it's still choosing not to
They can get Kristi Noem there for a photoshoot whenever the fuck they want. It would be trivial to bring him back.
Rule of law? What rule of law?
"Checks cleared and the vacations are paid for, fuck that guy we are getting paid" - Roberts
I had an amazing fantasy earlier of sending the supreme court to this very same prison
Supremely Corrupt
I hope he sues the crap out of us!