this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
529 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

68673 readers
4220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I can't believe it wasn't like that since the beginning.
How is it not one of the many distracting things they would ban immediately?

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Some definitely tried. I got suspended in middle school because I forgot to turn my phone on silent and it went off in class. They had a "zero tolerance" policy, so it didn't matter that it was an accident

[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it has to do with the Columbine school shootings.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

We're talking about France here.
And they still have phones in school in a lot of other coutries.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 3 days ago

We've had a similar ban in the Netherlands for a year or two now. Mobile phones were already not allowed in classes. Kids seem to have survived.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What's funny is all the rich tech elite send their kids to schools that don't use tech to the same degree as public schools. Wonder why.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Because personal tutors are engaging directly with the student the whole session?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Probably because elite schools have smaller class sizes or teacher/student ratios thereby making it less necessary to have the ability to disseminate information via mass means with technology. Put it all up on a big screen where 30 kids can see it, send the assignments out to 120 kids via google classroom on school issued chromebooks (because there are plenty of kids from families that cannot afford computers), and do all the grading and review digitally. I’d be willing to bet those expensive private schools use plenty of tech, maybe kids carry Macbook Airs instead, but there’s no escape from tech in schools.

[–] RecipeForHate1@lemmy.ml 33 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Brazil did it a while ago. Nobody died [yet]

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Brazil and nobody dying, what kind of propaganda is this?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Make school fun and not a prison and then kids don't need phones like their office worker parents do.

[–] NightCrawlerProMax@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Doesn’t matter if the teacher is an absolute gem and knows how to captivate kids who want to learn. Most kids prefer the dopamine hit from social media and other phone usage compared to actually learning. It just ruins it for kids who actually want to learn.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 92 points 3 days ago (14 children)

I mean... fine? France always does things kind of top-down and there's certainly no reason you have to have your phone readily available, and plenty of evidence it's good to be away from it.

It's not like they need to get to their phones to tell their parents there's an active shooter on campus. 😐

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (14 children)

Does anybody but me remember when schools banned walkmen? What about portable CD players? Gameboy? This happens everytime a new technology becomes popular and schools don't know how to regulate it they do this.

The downside is, a fair few student will have their phones confiscated by the school. But it won't dissuade them from bringing them in. You make them better at hiding them instead of creating tools and protocols to enforce for when they can and can't use them.

The crazy thing is, this should be about schools not wanting to be liable for or responsible for these pieces of tech. But Everytime I see legislation like this, it's to do with "children's mental health", or these devices being a distraction.

Model it. Nobody should be allowed to have a phone in schools by this metric. No phones for students? No phones for teachers and administration.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they have to hide their phones now, they won't be using them as much, which is The end goal.

You might be living proof that not using tiktok does not necessarily make you smart, I'll give you that point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

Does anybody but me remember when schools banned walkmen? What about portable CD players? Gameboy?

Except none of these things were feeding Andrew Tate or Joe Rogan garbage straight into their highly impressionable skulls.

I, for one, support the banning of phones in schools. The social media addiction has been shown to cause depression, particularly in girls, and the brainwashing is ever more apparent.

If anything, this policy fails by not going far enough. I question whether kids should have access to social media at all before a certain age.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yeah I think the adverse effect of handing an iPhone to a 10 year old in Atlanta, when that teen is still highly impressionable unrestricted and unsupervised access to the internet is far worse than handing a kid a Gameboy on which they can only game, or a Walkman on which the worst thing they can do is listen to Cardi B.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I remember when people didn't have phones on them 24/7 and kids didn't die and parents could call the school if they needed to talk to the kids. Somehow we survived.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And a bunch of people didn't but we don't talk about them, it was the norm back then.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Teddy sniffing glue, he was twelve years old, fell from the roof on East 2-9, Cathy was eleven when she pulled the plug, twenty six reds and a bottle of wine.

But people don't like that song, so you're right about not wanting to talk about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 38 points 3 days ago (28 children)

Good, you don't need smart phones in school

For anyone screeching that you do: No. You don't.

We've been without smart phones for millenia, literally, and we were fine without. You will be fine without.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For anyone screeching that you do: No. You don't

I have a feeling that you haven't gone to school recently lol

Educational resources are blocked that you literally cannot do your assignments without accessing. Teachers will tell you to use your phone to access it.

If you have some questions for someone who is actively in highschool right now, I'd be happy to answer :)

edit: tone

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 20 points 3 days ago (8 children)

we didnt have clean drinking water either, or daily showers, we lived without soap for millenia

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›