this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
1014 points (95.7% liked)

solarpunk memes

3745 readers
849 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] giorovv@friendica.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@compostgoblin Please take a moment to think and tell me why, in your opinion, someone could come to hate cops.

[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago

Well, there are many reasons someone could come to dislike cops, but their legacy and ongoing patterns of brutality and racial discrimination both come to mind.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I live in a small town in the rural south.

The 'community patrols' would very quickly turn into KKK lynch mobs going after anyone that was 'woke'.

Yeah, ACAB, but the alternative that would happen in most places is pretty bad too. There's gotta be a 3rd way to keep people safe without using either cops as they exist now or vigilance committees.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 13 points 6 days ago

I can also see community "policing" in cities devolve into chaos as a bunch of petty kings pop up in every neighbourhood.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 6 days ago

The guys in those hypothetical lynch mobs are the cops today.

At least in this scenario you could get your buds and shoot back at the klan fuckers, maybe.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I mean, it think it's the wrong question. I think the question is, what can we do to minimize the need for police? The problem there is it usually involves lifting up poorer communities and no one wants to supply these communities with the resources to do it.

[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Amen. What I find fascinating and difficult to swallow is impoverished (and non) people's desire to have kids and not raise them, almost as if they are happy with their shit sandwich, and think "yeah" I'll give this to a another human. Boy o boy have I seen deplorables breed when they are in no capacity to look after themselves. It comes across to me as a type of evil. The meat grinder is made from this stupidity.

[–] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Boy o boy have I seen deplorables breed when they are in no capacity to look after themselves.

This is why I decided I didn't want kids many years ago. I can barely look after myself, I can't imagine having to take care of kids.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sizing2673@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Agreed. It is multi step

You reduce the need for it, you reduce their military power. You give them better training and force them to use non lethal forces when possible (usually it is)

Stop breaking into people's houses incorrectly and shooting them

Also forced body cameras and strict follow up

Police should be needed less, but police still need to be policed by the people

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why are so many people convinced the Police we have are the only ones we COULD have?

We don't want NO Police

We want BETTER Police

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Ive repeated this argument so many times.

  1. They need to have a FEDERAL licence to provide law enforcement. So you cant just move when you get in trouble.

  2. Each officer needs to carry their own "malpractice" insurance so the city/state doesnt have a financial interest in ignoring bad behavior.

  3. Make "Abuse of the public trust" a federal felony. Officer making bad judgement calls in the heat of the moment is one thing but calculated corruption should be a federal offence.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I had an argument about this with a friend once. I was saying if we just abolish the police, private enterprise will probably step in to fill the gap. I don't want that. I don't want amazon offering policing services (as part of Prime. vomit).

I think the police need to be split up into smaller institutions, and have a lot less murder powers.

Someone needs to address the "Someone broke into my house and stole my TV" problem, without a profit motive and with accountability.

There should be something to address "My neighbor is screaming at his wife and I think he's hitting her" that doesn't involve some low empathy assholes with guns rolling up to mock the woman.

I don't know how to fix this.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Cops are deliberately trained to be be fearful and quick to shoot. You start by reforming how cops are trained. Literally following how the military trains their troops would be a big improvement. This vet got fired for deescalating a situation, per his military training, but counter to his police training.

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How the fuck is military training actually doing this better than police training… wow

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Because the militarization of police is just them larping after watching too many war movies.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago

Strict hiring policies so you aren't scraping the bottom of the barrel. Better and longer training pipelines so you're getting career professionals instead of thugs. Better accountability and enforcement of regulations so they're being held to standards consummate with their responsibilities. Letting beat cops police their own communities so they have a stake in things.

And this I think is unique to the US, getting rid of the mind boggling layers of law enforcement. In Australia, we have state and federal police. Not state, federal, county, city, campus, sherrifs, and whatever.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Mmm, not sure I like this better. If the majority in your community are filled with religious crazies suddenly you're ruled by backwards ass religious laws from millenia ago. Laws and enforcement would be even more incoherent, not less. No matter who is enforcing the laws, we need ways to keep ALL people in power accountable regardless of how it's organized and I don't think that goes away in a more anarchist kind of world.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Couldn't those community patrols be considered a type of police

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Normally theyre called gangs. The thing that made the black panthers special is that as a cause it was killed before it deteriorated. A lot of gangs form to protect from other gangs, police corruption, and general sense of community.

Usually most folks aren't willing to do things free, so it devolves as it grows. Loses the original basis for formation. It's why christians is a confusing term, you have atheists, catholics, buddhists, etc. All lumped in while all can and are christian, there is degrees of severity.

[–] Sizing2673@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh so like first it starts out protecting the community from issues but then it turns into "the crips have to pay" and now heroin to pay for a turf war...

That's interesting

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

You start protecting the community but who is paying you, your rent, or your food? You have to start charging and now you're another tax. Tensions rise. And yes this would impact drug trafficking which is usually lethal. Note, junkies are relatively safe, dont get between their drugs or stare and you are good.

Trying to do good is difficult because by definition, the only good thing you can do is retain the status quo. Any change will have negative repercursions.

A good goal quickly deteriorates when the power structure forces you to deal with the devil. And where does he reside?

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Atheists and Buddhists aren’t christians? I was gonna say do you mean religious, but atheists aren’t religious either

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

Atheists can be christians by believing in the structure provided through it, atheism is just not believing in god.

I do not believe in a greater being, I believe in man. Even Jesus himself did not claim to be of god but of man, and that he was purely a messenger.

Buddhist's can be primarily Christians as well, however they adhere not to just one guide of knowledge. That's the weakness with my experience in western life, I was born christian. I saw buddhism as a differing way of life, while it really is more structural and philosophical to me than spiritual.

Dramatization and symbolism is lost when talking about something as complex as religion.

The bible itself is a collection of texts, your spiritualism and religion doesn't end there. It is something you live, endure, question, and eventually absolve yourself of through determination. It's more just a guise for talking about our mortality, consequences, acknowledgements, and the thereafter.

So in the wake of death, your own or any you love, you have to imagine them. You will miss them and wish it were true, in it you will find your spark. You will awaken the ability to see the suffering, phantoms and demons everyone carries. However in such suffering you will savor the most delicate of kindness, appreciate the little passing moments.

In that you awaken the ~~sharingan~~ royalty free eyeball to see something you couldn't before. I don't think it is god, rather passion for the nectar of life. Regardless of hardships.

For context. Catholic raised. Buddhist by 11. Sikh by 18. Eventually found Sri Ramakrishna's teachings in a little free library this year. All while atheist - and now I question that, as this book allowed me to believe something I never could.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I agree with you. What would be the use of those patrols if not to police behaviour?

Maybe someone with more historical knowledge could expand on the meaning of "Black Panther style community patrols".

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

I think the difference is the idea of people from the community, with the consent of the community, policing said community. From the community, for the community. I think it's a nice idea, but it really depends on the actual community what that would look like. More peaceful and inclusive in some places, horribly authoritarian and racist (even worse than US cops now) in others.

But yeah it'd just be different form of policing and those doing it could be just called police.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Without cops, who will throw people out on the street when they can't pay rent?
Or who will arrest the folk giving less fortunate people food?

I've never needed a cop for anything, and in the case of theft, I hardly expect the item back in any usable condition anyway.

If someone shoots me and runs off, the cops can't unshoot me, or unbeat me up, or unrape me. They might beat me up just for asking for help. Who's to say I get a good cop that day?

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago

What we need is a police force of negotiators and social workers.

A police officer should only get a job after a mandatory time spent as a social worker and a expensive study of law and peaceful conflict resolving.

Before that: no weapons and no authority.

Also accountability: every bullet and every taser use has to be explained. Cams 24/7 on the job, disabling them should be a grounds for immediate expulsion.

Oh and of course, cops should no longer be above the law.

I think this would also scare away a lot of the people who become police officers for the wrong reasons.

Yes, I believe it could be possible to have good cops - it's just not possible under the current system. Hell, the current system is a deterrent to good cops.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

Can we get the slavery aspect far the fuck away from punishment as well? I’m sick of this country (America) acting like the moral arbiter of the world while we still practice slavery.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Cops dont responsibly handle the authority they have been given and they desperately need to be put under adult supervision. We cant count of either of the two political parties to do that. Its been that way for at least 100 years. So maybe getting rid of them and letting something new form is the only way. They are hopeless.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Keep me honest, isn't the gangsta group called Crypts came from this?

[–] rockstarmode@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Crips, which have been given the backronym "Community Resistance In Progress".

But it doesn't take much research to show they do not stand for the types of values you're referring to.

load more comments
view more: next ›