this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
245 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Passwords are safer than unsecured accounts

O, Rly?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] andlewis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Could be yuge.

[–] AgedCheddar@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

huh, uBlock Origin gets me through just fine.

[–] AgedCheddar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm on my phone using the in-app browser, blocking ads with DNS. It works well but not quite as well as uBlock Origin would if I was using it for sure

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ah, I've got a habit of using an external browser. although I've just tried and Firefox handles in-app browsers with its custom tabs, so uBO is stil there. neat.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s a small “Continue without disabling” link as well!

[–] AgedCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I totally missed that, thank you!

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

It’s quite tiny and light colored!

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

Now we just need to have services using it.

Anyone got a good overview of Do's and Don'ts for developers? Would love to integrate it into my services

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Still waiting for it to actually appear on my Firefox extension

[–] stown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anybody know if this works for people self-hosting?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're talking about vaultwarden, that's an unofficial project, so will take him time to map the client and add that in.

If you're talking about the the regular paid Bitwarden server binaries, of course it will have support.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there is an official self hosted bitwarden server. It doesn't support SSO, I guess time will tell if it supports this.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's bare minimum, not even 2FA is working without a premium account.

I was shocked how much more Vaultwarden is providing for free.

[–] Traister101 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean Bitwarden wants to make money. 10$ a year to not have to mess about with self hosting (however beneficial that might be) is a pretty good deal.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, to each their own, half an hour of setup is something i can do myself. Centralized password safes aren't my favorite thing.

I just think that 2FA is such a must have feature, that it's weird to put it behind a paywall, all that password-, file- or text-sharing or now passkeys are nice to have and should be paid.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They probably put 2FA behind a paywall because nobody in their right mind would actually want to store 2FA and their passwords behind one account in the same storage. I suppose you can see the problem.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

The official self-hosted Bitwarden server does support SSO.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you're using Vaultwarden, it's around the corner

https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/pull/4025

https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/pull/3593

Edit: It works with the testing branch of Vaultwarden and the latest Firefox addon:

https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/releases/tag/browser-v2023.10.1

It is not yet signed, so you should wait for it to be distributed by Firefox

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Nice, thanks for the info

[–] sanimalp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wait, so bitwarden's support is only a mechanism to save other systems passkey? Or is it a mechanism to originate a passkey, as an alternative to Google and friends? My conception of what is going on might be off, as well.. So.. Feel free to enlighten..

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Does it work with the Firefox extension on Android ?

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've posted a reply to another comment with more details on my question that seemed to have disappeared. So I'm reposting it.

Bitwarden, a popular password manager, now supports passkeys through its browser extension, with plans to extend support to its Android app in the future.

Yes, I've read the article before asking the question.

However I don't find the answer to my question. It will work with the browser extension, not with the android app.

What about the browser extension on Android ? It's not the same thing as the android app.

Especially since Firefox is trying to close the gap between mobile and desktop add-on. It's possible that it could work, even if the extension is not as useful as the app on Android.

That's it.