this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
652 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

69041 readers
2899 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter (now X) and Square (now Block), sparked a weekend’s worth of debate around intellectual property, patents, and copyright, with a characteristically terse post declaring, “delete all IP law.”

X’s current owner Elon Musk quickly replied, “I agree.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 73 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They don't want to delete all IP law, they just want to delete the IP law which is preventing them from postponing the collapse of the AI hype a little bit more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

... Delete... all... IP law?

So... just literally make all piracy legal, switch all gaming and tv show and movie production/consumption... to an optional donation model?

Fuck it, why not.

I am both an avid pirate and have a degree in econ, wrote papers as an undergrad on how to potentially reform the DMCA... and uh yeah, at this point yeah no one has any fucking idea how any thing works, everyone is an idiot, sure fuck it, blow it all up, why not.

[–] Sizing2673@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah except you know it isn't going to be that

They're going to go "yeah but not like that"

They'll just remove consumer protections and make it so you own even less and if you try to fight it, you'll have the full weight of the court system to make you poor

Is musk supports it, that's exactly what he's hoping will happen. The rich will be able to take advantage of it and the poor will either stay the same or get worse

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

also jam in there protections for AI training so they don’t have to deal with those pesky rent-seeking “authors”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Abolish IP for billionaires… not for the poor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 22 points 6 days ago

I mean, I'd like to get rid of IP Law too....

But I actually mean get rid of, not an "Under New Management" sense like Elon The Musky Husky wants

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 27 points 6 days ago

Honestly, I'm a fan of abolishing IP law too, but for some reason I suspect the implementation of that they support is very different than the one I support

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 32 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I hate agreeing with these assholes, but I do in this case. IP/patent law is explicitly designed to stifle competition. At most, it should last a few years (if you agree with the "recoup the cost of innovation" argument). Innovation will be done for the sake of innovation if there's competition though. If your opposition innovates and you don't, you're going to be destroyed. The exception is when they agree to not compete, which is already illegal though not enforced as strongly as it should be.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

IIRC the original US copyright law as written by the founders was 25 years or so. The extensions on that have all been in the last 70 years or so due to mega corps like Disney.

The problem with Musk and Dorsey is that they want the copyright laws to apply to them but no one else. "Rules for thee but not for me" mentality of the wealthy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

This is going to be used corporations to take away everything from individuals who are innovating (more than they already are). Nobody will be able to build wealth off a good idea again. Which if we were in a society where wealth wasn't required to live a good life I would be okay with, but we aren't, so I'm not.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I hate agreeing with these assholes, but I do in this case.

I guarantee you that neither of these assholes champion any kind of open access to their end works. Elon famously shut down the Twitter API and vexatiously litigated any number of Tesla copycats. Dorsey is only plugging an anti-IP stance because he's got a new AI engine out and wants to get on board the "Stealing everyone's DeviantArt library" gravy train. None of it is remotely sincere.

If your opposition innovates and you don’t, you’re going to be destroyed.

That's simply not true. There are a myriad of historical examples as to it not being true, from the Japanese abolition of the gun during the Meiji Restoration to German telecoms clinging to copper wire data infrastructure despite fiber optics being obviously superior. If you don't innovate because you have an economic incentive to drag your heels, and your economic clout gives you the ability to close out competitors, then you can do perfectly fine "innovating" in the field of anti-competitive trade behavior rather than real tech innovation.

What we have in Musk and Dorsey are two men who have benefited enormously from Silicon Valley insider investing and cheap borrowing. They don't give a shit about other people's IP in the same way Microsoft was more than happy to pillage code and reverse engineer software of its rivals. But if you think they're going to apply that to their own codebase and personal economic interests... well...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

Right? There's no reason Superman and Winnie The Pooh should fall under ANY copyright, everyone involved with the creation of both ins long dead.. The only thing being protected is DC and Disney's bottom line.

And the fact that Tarzan isn't public domain is most absurd

Hell it took forever for Sherlock Holmes to be public domain, and the world he was created in doesn't even remotely exist anymore.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 36 points 6 days ago

"Delete all IP law" say people who have never created anything of any value to humanity.

[–] nthavoc 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why not get rid of the patent trolls, the monopolies shelving useful technologies through patent loopholes, the ... Oh I see the tech billionaires again wanting to uproot a system because loopholes are just too much effort now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago

Of course they are both lying. As with all capitalists, they will always use the law to seize greater power.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

i'd also like to delete all billionaires

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (18 children)

This would be disastrous for actual manufacturing because a patent is the only thing that makes it worthwhile to spend a bunch of money upfront to develop a new technology. Unlike with software where you don't have nearly as much up front capital investment to develop something, it costs millions of dollars to get a manufacturing process up and running and in a good enough state to where it can actually work out financially. Without patents, your competitor can just take all of that work and investment and just copy it with the benefit of doing it right the first time, so they're able to undercut you on cost. The alternative is that everyone is super secretive about what they're doing and no knowledge is shared, which is even worse. Patents are an awesome solution to this problem because they are public documents that explain how technologies work, but the law allows a monopoly on that technology for a limited amount of time. I also feel that in the current landscape, copyright is probably also good (although I would prefer it to be more limited) because I don't want people who are actually coming up with new ideas having to compete with thousands of AI slop copycats ruining the market.

TL;DR- patents are good if you're actually building things, tech bros are morons who think everything is software.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 6 days ago

In the manufacturing space, people are questioning if patents help them at all. There is no stopping China from copying your design and selling it on Aliexpress. In fact, since you're almost certainly getting your product manufactured in China in the first place, there is no stopping the very manufacturing plant you're using from producing extras and undercutting you.

Consider this old EEVblog vid about bringing a product to market, and the #1 tip is "don't bother with a patent": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7BL1O0xCcY

Patents have evolved to be useful to patent trolls. That's it.

That's not what Dorsey and Musk are after, though. They want to kill copyright law because it's inconvenient for AI training data.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago

Yes, I’m fully aware we want to abolish IP law for different reasons but still, I’m onboard.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 22 points 6 days ago

Oh no, this is so... good idea. Yarr! Pirate Party approves.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago

That would be a-m-a-z-i-n-g. Private game servers, fan remakes of shows and movies, I would be over the moon.

Too bad it won't happen

[–] Blindsite 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If they did could we use the Twitter bird or Tesla logo all we wanted? I mean yeah let's get rid of all IP law but get rid of it for everyone. If we want to copy a big corporation then yeah we should do that. Get rid of copyright and trademarks, woo! Publish all that hidden patented material so anyone can produce it. Let's get creative. You think big corps will get on board with all this?

I don't think Elon is that smart to realize what 'delete all IP laws' entails. He probably thinks it in the sense of an anarcho-capitalist.

Anarchy for me not for thee.

[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 days ago

Delete all internet protocol law

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago

Be Weird, Download a Car, Generate Art, Screw Copyrights!

[–] randomname@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is the only thing he's ever done or said that I agree with, even though his real intentions are obvious. We really do need a complete re-writing of IP law, but not from Elon.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

i came in to say the same thing. IP law rarely benefits the working class. it's usually a tool used by the likes of disney to bash peasants over the head. it also slows down innovation.

but the problem is, something like this is supposed to coincide with the end of capitalism and implementation of things like UBI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Hold on hold on. Don't mention a damn thing

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Well a billionaire commanded we argue about copyright law. I guess we need to expend our energy and build enough momentum so that Musk can grab more power during the turmoil.

Trumpers did their part by arguing about free speech. Time to tap into our issues with IP laws and help Musk too!

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

These people are threats to our actual lives.

[–] alphahowler@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Avoiding tax loopholes and fair taxation for billionnaires could also be considered. Just saying. Otherwise I think that the idea of deleting all IP laws is just wishful (and naive) thinking, assuming people would cooperate and build on each other’s inventions/creations.

Given the state the world is currently in, I don’t see that happening soon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theblips@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

Can't disagree here, this would be great

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hard yes. Glad to see there's at least one thing we are aligned on.

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I'm curious: why?

Removing IP law just feels like it would only benefit those with the resources to scale new technology quickly. It basically kills all start ups.

edit: word

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nah copyright is useful for free software. Patents, we could probably live without patents

Trademark is also useful. I don't want Tyson making fake vegan hot dogs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selson@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’ve been on board with this for fucking years. Our IP system in the USA is so fucked. It’s like “death of the creator plus 40 years” or something and then Disney lobbies to increase it further to protect the mouse.

Let me make Mickey Mouse shirts and let me make money off of them!

Let me stream Nintendo games without a cease and desist!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›