this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
30 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

12891 readers
1350 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Nah, we should make life more liveable without cars. Cars in themselves aren’t bad, but our over-dependency on them is.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People in this thread thinking this is a serious policy proposal 🤣

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The automobiles, parking and highways vicious cycle has proven to be an indictment of capitalism and the corruption of the US. i don't think going electric for all our cas is going to be enough, and were seeing climate migration not only to the US but northward within the US.

The movie Mad Max (and its sequels) was inspired by somone observing car obsession tendencies among Australians and positing how fuel would be prioritized above its utility. Our obsession is worse here in the States, and for our love of cars and failure to change for sake of the world may see a similar apocalypse, though with fewer working vehicles and a lot more cannibalism.

I hope I'm wrong, of couse.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

I completely agree but that doesn’t make immediately banning all cars a reasonable proposal. My assumption was that the meme was intended to spark discussion, which it certainly has. Though it sounds like OP is a little more serious than I thought.

[–] wsweg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And what of people that live out in the country, far from a city? Not walkable or bikeable. Building public transport there is not viable. Cars with sustainable fuel sources are the far better solution.

[–] parmenides@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This comm is literally called fuckcars

[–] wsweg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which explains the irrational opinions such as OP’s

[–] Adeptfuckup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Eh. I don’t hate cars. I just want better infrastructure for all street users. Everyone is capable of acting like a complete asshole using the public right of way. Think of the worst shithead that cut you off on the freeway. Now imagine that same shithead doing the same to a pedestrian or cyclist? It’s really fucking dangerous. All you have to do is google ‘pedestrian hit and run’ to see that we have a huge fucking problem on our hands. Ban all cars? No! Ban private vehicles where pedestrians, cyclists , and transit riders are? Yes! That way people don’t need to fucking die. Some people don’t need to drive. I’m sure we’ve all mumbled that under our breath after nearly getting wrecked by some dipshit that had no business driving to begin with.

[–] TheMechanic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nearly every single small town was built on a backbone of rail. They could at the very least put back what was stolen.

[–] wsweg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Rail used for freight. Do you think people were taking the train to the grocery store or the doctor’s office? Not to mention, that’s still in the city. There are people that live many miles away from the nearest public infrastructure, outside of roads and electricity.

Then there’s the dilemma of being at the mercy of the train schedule. 1 to 2 stops a day. It’s not like public transport in metropolitan areas where there are many stops a day.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Explain how we'd get around with cars. Is the realistic expectation that every city is supposed to be redesigned overnight and public transportation every inch of the city.