this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
9 points (61.0% liked)

politics

18977 readers
3333 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

“One of the problems of the two party system is what Margaret Thatcher used to call ‘Tina’ – there is no alternative,” he said, referring to a phrase the former British prime minister used to defend her government’s stringent economic policies in the early 1980s.

“The Democratic party has this crypto-fascist element when it comes to mass incarceration, when it comes to dropping bombs … when it comes to surveillance, when it comes to violation of individual liberties vis-a-vis the national security state.”

I mean, he has a point. However, I don't know that acknowledging the flaws in a two-party system, then running in such a way that'll likely invoke those very same flaws is a winning strategy.

It seems to me like someone in his shoes would be more effective running for congress / rallying people around reworking our current first-past-the-post voting system & electoral college.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Anyone who votes for him instead of Biden is a fucking moron who wants Trump in the white house again, whether they admit it or not.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I doubt anyone who votes for him would have ever voted for Biden and didn't vote for him in 2020 either, so they're basically a non-factor.

These are people who vote third party every time.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think that's the candidate's point. There are voters who sit out elections because they have no interest in the two major party candidates. Biden is a centrist who assumes progressive voters will show up because they are afraid of Trump.

I don't agree with Dr. West on most issues, but I don't have a problem with anyone running to force a candidate to take positions on the issues they care about. It's Biden's race to lose.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Biden is a centrist who assumes progressive voters will show up because they are afraid of Trump.

Keeping Trump and Trumpies out of office is protecting the country from a literal no-kidding fascist dictatorship. Their plans are very explicitly stated, to criminalize opposition, free the Jan 6 traitors, and put Oath Breakers and other brownshirts on your streets.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I agree with you, and will again vote for Joe Biden regardless. That doesn't make what I said untrue.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but if they sit out elections anyway, what does it matter if they vote for Cornel West instead? It doesn't take a vote from Biden because they don't vote anyway.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It matters if the number of West voters exceeds the margin of victoy. It means a more inspiring candidate could capture those voters and win.

With Trump, there isn't very much middle ground to capture. Voters know who he is, and either drink the kool aid or recognize the danger. Biden can't give a speech or support an agenda that will convince a Trump supporter to vote for Biden. Likewise, Biden supporters won't be convinced to suddenly vote for Trump under any circumstances. But the non-voters, the third party voters, they can be motivated to support Biden. Biden would just have to reach out and do something motivational.

I don't know a single person who has admitted they will vote for Cornel West, so I cannot speak to their mindset. But if he does have supporters, if he does motivate people to come out of the woodwork, and if he challenges Biden to take more progressive stances to win those voters, if he drops out and endorses Biden, then he'll have a positive impact on the race.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but if they sit out elections anyway, what does it matter if they vote for Cornel West instead?

They give centrists someone to blame.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

The damn leftists just won't get in line!

[–] Argongas@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

RANKED. CHOICE. VOTING.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

He shook Bernie's hand, he should know better.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I honestly want to know what his angle is. What does wooing alienated non-voters achieve?

Also, if you're going to compare someone to a spoiler like Nader, there's RFK, Jr. who is actually polling in the very low double digits.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It's compelling (in theory) because there are more people that don't vote than do.

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago

I know the man is smart, but how is he also so dumb about how our politics has become so broken? Surely he understands that his candidacy will only harm his stated goals until we pass electoral reform so third parties can't act as spoilers.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


If Cornel West is worried about being a spoiler whose candidacy might let Donald Trump back into the White House by stealing votes from President Joe Biden, he isn’t showing it.

At a fundraising event in Busboys and Poets, a leftwing bookshop and restaurant in Washington, West – a veteran activist of myriad causes – insisted he seeks the sympathies of neither cohort, but is instead trying to woo alienated, hardened non-voters.

With Trump buoyant in many polls, some have likened West’s presence to that of the longtime activist Ralph Nader in 2000, who was widely believed to have persuaded wavering voters to switch to him from Al Gore in the key battleground of Florida, tipping the state and thus the election to George W Bush.

Addressing an audience of committed supporters, West – who campaigned against Trump’s presidency when he was in office and advocated voting for Biden in 2020, railed against the rigid two-party US political system and adopted a “plague on both your houses” posture to the Democrats and Republicans.

“One of the problems of the two party system is what Margaret Thatcher used to call ‘Tina’ – there is no alternative,” he said, referring to a phrase the former British prime minister used to defend her government’s stringent economic policies in the early 1980s.

“The Democratic party has this crypto-fascist element when it comes to mass incarceration, when it comes to dropping bombs … when it comes to surveillance, when it comes to violation of individual liberties vis-a-vis the national security state.”


The original article contains 767 words, the summary contains 256 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Teon@kbin.social -3 points 11 months ago

LOL Cornel, you won't even get past the primaries.