this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
148 points (98.1% liked)

Global News

3789 readers
610 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington (AFP) – The Trump administration aims to remove degradation of habitat from its definition of "harm" to endangered species, proposing Wednesday a rule change that would open the door to human activity in ecologically sensitive environments.

The US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the definition of "harm" in the Endangered Species Act should exclude "actions that impair the habitat of protected species."

Environmental groups said the rule change would allow timber, oil and mining activity, as well as other activities by individuals and the government, to destroy the habitats of endangered animals.

"For 50 years, the ESA has saved numerous species -- including iconic American species like bald eagles, gray wolves, Florida manatees, and humpback whales -- from extinction," environmental law organization Earthjustice said.

"One key to this success has been its definition of harm, which recognizes the common-sense concept that destroying a forest, beach, river, or wetland that a species relies on for survival constitutes harm to that species," it said, adding that the group was prepared to challenge the proposal in court.

"There's just no way to protect animals and plants from extinction without protecting the places they live, yet the Trump administration is opening the flood gates to immeasurable habitat destruction," said Noah Greenwald, codirector of endangered species at the Center for Biological Diversity.

"Without a prohibition on habitat destruction, spotted owls, sea turtles, salmon and so many more imperiled animals won't stand a chance," said Greenwald. "Trump is trying to drive a knife through the heart of the Endangered Species Act."

The proposal will now be open to public comment for 30 days.

Since its 1973 enactment, the Endangered Species Act has been credited with saving iconic species such as the gray wolf, bald eagle and grizzly bear from extinction.

President Donald Trump ran on a platform that promised to roll back environmental regulations that crimp economic development.

In February, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued a call for proposals to unleash US energy, potentially opening up fragile landscapes from the Arctic to the Grand Canyon and even national monuments for exploitation.

Days later, Trump said his administration aimed to cut about 65 percent of staff at the Environmental Protection Agency.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 45 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It's like they're actively trying to do as much damage as possible, to literally everything.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

It's almost if

[–] ech@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago

Not "like". That's the goal.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Turns out, they actually WANT the world to end so they can: 1. Go to heaven 2. Buy everything dirt cheap 3. Kill off those pesky non whites

When you think about it that way, I'm shocked there haven't been nukes yet.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

How are they trying to harm the profits of the big US tech companies?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They've all lost billions since he took office.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Zoom out. They're not loosing. They're buying right now as the middle class sells. This is what a transfer of wealth looks like.

They're increasing their wealth.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The long term impacts of Trump and the current Republicans is going to be larger than anyone is estimating. All those tech companies will be hurting in the long run.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He's hurting us to benefit them.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There is no one in the US who will benefit from what Trump is doing (besides maybe Trump and some cronies). The only people who seem to be benefiting are Russia and maybe China.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nah, this is a transfer of power between the big banking plutocrats who have ruled the US for a long time to the big tech bro plutocrats.

There are some people who are benefiting. See who sat in the front row of his inauguration.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago

Zoom out. Read Naomi Klein's shock doctrine.

This is how they make a killing.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Ok, it says that it should be officially published today.

This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/17/2025 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2025-06746, and on https://govinfo.gov/

After that happens you have 30 days to leave a comment:

Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/. In the Search box, enter FWS–HQ–ES–2025–0034, which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then, click on the Search button. On the resulting page, in the panel on the left side of the screen, under the Document Type heading, check the Proposed Rule box to locate this document. You may submit a comment by clicking on “Comment.”

Also, if you have the chance, protest like we are about to fuck over all future generations.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oh what bastards, they timed the publication so that people forget about it after a 4 day weekend.

Set yourself an alarm, and save this post.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Even from an economic perspective this proposed rule change is horrible. We learn an enormous amount from animals and that knowledge creates enormous economic value.

An example is the horseshoe crab

In 2023, the US Fish and Wildlife Service halted the harvesting of horseshoe crabs in the Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge, South Carolina, from March 15 to July 15 to aid their reproduction.[87] This decision was influenced by the importance of horseshoe crab eggs as a food source for migratory birds, the ongoing use of horseshoe crabs for bait, and the use of their blood in medical products.[87] The ban supports the conservation goals of the refuge, spanning 66,000 acres (26,700 hectares) of marshes, beaches, and islands near Charleston.[87]

This estimates the value of horseshoe crabs to the medical research industry at $100M per year (they have special blue blood). And as our technology improves we are always learning more from animals, so we don't know which animals will give us our next billion dollar industry. The cost of extinction to future generations is literally infinite.

[–] missphant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"For 50 years, the ESA has saved numerous species -- including iconic American species like bald eagles [...] from extinction"

Self-proclaimed patriots driving their own national symbol to extinction, no satire in the world could've written it better.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 8 points 5 days ago

Yes because if someone demolishes your house or sets it on fire they cause no harm to you, right? I mean you don't really need a place like to sleep and be safe right?

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nice to see that animals aren’t better off then Americans. At least there’s consistency.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

Pretty sure millions being murdered every year (without the courts recognizing their death as murder) is not better

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I know, let's try every bat shit idea the far right has ever come up with.