this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
279 points (99.3% liked)

World News

45984 readers
4406 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’m kind of surprised they are flying them back. Should have been like “it’s sitting on the tarmac, keys in it. Come and get it, we aren’t paying.”

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If they are refusing to pay for them, leaving them there would be gifting them to those airlines. Boeing is owed money, not the other way around.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Sounds like the art of the deal to me.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Crash and burn

[–] hedhoncho@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’re saving themselves a a lot of airplane crashes actually

[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

It is a 737 MAX, so quite possibly

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn, that's not fair. Boeing were doing their best to make their planes unbuyable with their absolute trash company culture resulting in tons of safety issues. They almost had it on their own and now the trade war madness is stealing their thunder.

It's like shooting a man that is about to jump off a cliff. Just let them cook. They got this.

[–] Thorgrem@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And now Trump will take the credits in trashing Boeing. And he will be proud of it.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago

Is this sarcasm? Is it irony? Why has this timeline derailed so massively that it’s impossible to tell??

[–] lemmus@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump: I'll trade you a shitshow of stupidity and backstabbing friends while rivals watch me smear shit on my face and I blow my enemies. In exchange I burn my country to the ground for no reason.

China: Deal

Americans: Deal

Russians: Deal

Rest of the world: WTF!!! Ah, fuckit. Deal.

Australians: May we please still have our submarines dear Daddy Trump?

[–] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago

Grinning because the Americans are getting a taste of their own medicine after snaking Australia away from a French submarine deal with AUKUS.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If they are flying them back, they should pay the 145% tariff. After all it is China paying it, right?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess they'd be ramping up Comac C919 production.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Funny enough, that's not even necessary in the short term.

Delta is refusing to take the delivery of various Airbus modells planned over the year unless Airbus guarantees to "pay for" all tariffs these might incur. Which Airbus of course won't. While it looks more like a cheap way out for them, various aviation news sources have already reported that Chinese airlines have declared their interest in these aircraft - both because the Anti-American sentiment and the lack in confidence in Boeing in their audience.

And ramping up the production isn't that easy - significant parts come from abroad and even with them, they would have to massively expand production - their production lines are fairly slow

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Yea, an area where the unintended consequences are actually going to push China domestically built airlines to be competitive with Airbus and Boeing, even if they lack the range and efficiency.