She can sue whoever the hell she likes. Why does the Supreme Court have to decide that? Sounds like a waste of their time
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2842 readers
803 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Mostly, except right there in the linked article it mentions:
A 1946 law generally allows people to sue the federal government for damages if employees cause injury or property loss through their negligence. But the law includes a number of exceptions, including for any claim raising from the “loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter.” The question for the high court, then, is whether the exception applies to Konan’s situation.
