this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
278 points (99.3% liked)

News

28850 readers
5061 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court seemed likely to uphold a key preventive-care provision of the Affordable Care Act in a case heard Monday.

Conservative justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court’s three liberals, appeared skeptical of arguments that Obamacare’s process for deciding which services must be fully covered by private insurance is unconstitutional.

The case could have big ramifications for the law’s preventive care coverage requirements for an estimated 150 million Americans. Medications and services that could be affected include statins to prevent heart disease, lung cancer screenings, HIV-prevention drugs and medication to lower the chance of breast cancer for high-risk women.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 55 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

So, The Fascist Five are starting to feel fear. Good.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Most likely someone they know would be negatively affected

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 40 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Amy Coney Barrett has been voting very reasonably for the last six months. She also gave Trump a scowling stink eye during his SotU address. I think the spell wore off and she’s starting to come around.

https://www.irishstar.com/culture/entertainment/amy-coney-barrett-donald-trump-34811228

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

She doesn't have the testosterone that compels the others to pretend to be badasses.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

While true (in both a literal and metaphorical way) frankly, all she has to do is be better that the Maga fucks, at least for now. Will take any win possible at the moment.

God my standards have dropped.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

I understand the dread, and disappointment.

Fat Baby Jeebus help us. But it seems, the smart psychopaths understand that what their Mad King is doing is bad, and are trying to offset the damage with the peasants.

I'm not saying that's a great thing, but shit...

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 33 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

"Skeptical of arguments"

Now I'm no lawyer and I can see how the details of this makes it seem like a complex issue, but my gut reaction was that it should be unconstitutional first and foremost for one group to be able to through their religious beliefs deny basic well being for others, especially in such a broad manner.

And my first response days ago before even seeing the specifics of this case was "the best way to topple ACA is and always has been to propose something better". Almost 20 years later and this has never been a route the Republicans have tried.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Of course they haven't. The ACA was their healthcare plan. Nearly everything the Dems originally wanted was stripped by the time it was passed. It's an almost copy-paste of Romneycare just on a national scale.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

THIS.

The ACA was created in a Conservative Think Tank. It's the Health Insurance Industry's wet dream: every single citizen MANDATED to buy health insurance. Mitt Romney tested the waters when he was Governor of Massachusetts. It was very popular. It should have been, it was better than dying with no insurance in a trailer park.

It's only when they labeled it OBAMACARE that the chuds lost their minds. Multiple independent journalistic organizations went to ground to interview peasants about their opinions on both, and when told it was the same thing, they did everything they could think of to justify not liking Obamacare (i.e., Negrocare.)

And most of their Boomer voters still believe they're not the same thing.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

I fought hard against the aca and I WANT universal, single payer health. The aca is terrible, and is nothing more than a tax for being alive

[–] parody@lemmings.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Marketing works


Very interesting, your comment! Thanks

[–] tischbier@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Honestly, and my guess is you already know this (and others I see beat me to it), American Conservatives mostly haven’t proposed anything else because the ACA was a conservative policy and was implemented first by Governor Romney in Massachusetts.

It’s hard to get more conservative than policy written by Heritage Foundation economist and implemented by a Mormon Vulture Capitalist.

Also the mask is off now. These mother fuckers don’t give a shit about policy anymore. They’re not passing any laws. Like I see 34 bills passed in 2023 and a handful of them were fluff—what the fuck?

Anyway I agree with you. It’s also very tough to get justices to not vote religiously—sorry I mean with “historical accuracy” in mind.

[–] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

For the modern conservative - any money not spent on public services is "something better"

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

"As long as it hurts "Them People" worser! 'Murica!"

[–] FPSkra@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This was really an administrative law case. The Biden administration was defending against a claim that the taskforce that decides which things should be covered was unconstitutional. Now the Trump admin has taken up the case and is arguing that the taskforce is constitutional, but because the secretary of hhs has final rule making authority and can actively override the taskforce. The supreme Court seems to be agreeing with that interpretation. Meaning that the brain worm will get more power to be able to decide which drugs should and should not be covered....so not a great result overall.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

This is the analysis I had as well. Anything trump wants, we don't.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

So next to nothing is better than nothing? Stop pretending that for-profit "health insurance" is anything other than gambling over when you'll die