this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
214 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

14302 readers
2531 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Make the eggs bigger

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 8 points 8 hours ago

Three 64 year old kids hunting a single 0.5m³ egg over a 12-by-8 metre garden

[–] loaExMachina@hexbear.net 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

(a+d)
a=area of garden
d= depth of undergrowth

Adding an area and a distance? Seems wonky.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 8 hours ago

It’s an empirical formula. Engineers don’t care about unit consistency as long as it works.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

You need an area modifier for normally thin undergrowth clamped to a base, where multiplying would be too powerful. So you add as a general bonus to the area

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 26 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

What units should we use for the formula?

I'm going with weeks for age, teaspoons for size, acres for area, and leagues for depth.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 6 points 8 hours ago

Some people will do anything except use SI units

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The units don't really matter as long as you're okay with your number of kids coming out with units of square root time over length(?)

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The first part of the equation seems to make sense, the number of eggs does depend on the number of children, age of the children, and size of the eggs. Makes sense that each of the kids gets two eggs. Not sure why it's the square root of y, but okay.

The (a+d) part i just don't understand at all. Why are the physical properties of the garden relevant?

And yeah, as the other commenter pointed out, i wonder what units they're even using for some of this data

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Area would help account for a really large yard, where you may want more eggs, or for a small one, where this calculation simply has too many eggs. So, egg density per square foot (or whatever unit they wanted).

Undergrowth size to me seems like its accounting for how many eggs simply aren't found. If the grass is 6" long, you'll want more eggs because they'll not all be found.

This seems to fit especially because they're added together, which means even a yard that was just dirt, no undergrowth, you'd get eggs from area alone. There's a floor on it. If it were a separate multiple then no grass would mean no eggs.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Most of those seem like nonlinear relationships, so it still doesn't make any sense still. The undergrowth would only start becoming an issue when the height gets taller than the egg diameter.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I agree, but that seems like about the level of detail a formula with no units would have.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If we hold the hunt in a single tall blade of grass we'll need to fit a lot of eggs in there.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 hours ago

Without units that's not really clear, could be depth in km

[–] Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I thought we were using potatoes so we didn't have to waste eggs!