this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5310 readers
1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Still, the most climate friendly meat are vegan alternatives.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’ve got this weird disease where my body can’t process fruits or veg, only meat, rice, pasta, and dairy.

I’m so excited for sustainable, lab-grown meat, I can’t even tell you. Living on rice and pasta alone sucks (even with dietary supplements), so I can’t ditch animal products.

They keep promising it, but every related headline is this bullshit. Hey corporate meat scientists: stop trying to make animal farming a thing in the future and start growing cloned steaks, please.

[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm vegan, and I hope lab grown gets so cheap for people like you that just want to taste some meat without the suffering. I may want to tray it form time to time, I'm not even half done exploring the recipes of the world.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, and for a source to back that up:

If I source my beef or lamb from low-impact producers, could they have a lower footprint than plant-based alternatives? The evidence suggests, no: plant-based foods emit fewer greenhouse gases than meat and dairy, regardless of how they are produced.

[…]

Plant-based protein sources – tofu, beans, peas and nuts – have the lowest carbon footprint. This is certainly true when you compare average emissions. But it’s still true when you compare the extremes: there’s not much overlap in emissions between the worst producers of plant proteins, and the best producers of meat and dairy.

https://ourworldindata.org/less-meat-or-sustainable-meat

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

to be supported with taxpayer dollars

Taxpayer funded factory farms? Why would anyone want their tax dollars going to a universally cruel industry, or to a company caught doing horrific things time and time again?

How about we subsidize more plant-based products? Make it more affordable and accessible, and this pesky beef problem will simply go away.

[–] RobbieGM@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately these factory farms already receive large subsidies in the US

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, socialism for corporations and for us peons, go fuck yourself-ism.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool. I don't give a shit about Capitalist labels in the first place. Buy the meat for taste and quality. Grass Fed or even better, locally sourced, is all you need.

[–] Vegasimov@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

Actually you don't need to murder animals for food at all! It's amazing we can have this knowledge in our time on earth

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just like how Marlboro lights don't cause as much cancer...

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pall Malls were marketed to pregnant women for stress control by people who played doctors on television as late as the early 1980s. You could even smoke in your hospital room.

We’ve come a long way, baby.

[–] currentbias@open-source-eschaton.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@LillyPip @lntl remember this when people tell you covid is nothing to worry about

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I never stopped wearing masks since the beginning, and get boosted every time it’s available.

I’ve always taken Covid seriously, same as the flu for which we get yearly boosters.

I’ll always be angry at antivaxxers that this thing that could have been contained like SARS was turned globally endemic because morons refuse to live in reality, so I’ll probably have to mask for the rest of my life (I have autoimmune issues that don’t play nice with Covid and I’d likely die very, very horribly, slowly and painfully drowning alone in an isolation room).

So yeah, I won’t forget who’s fault this is.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tyson claims that its new “Climate-Smart Beef” program, to be supported with taxpayer dollars, has managed to cut 10 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions from a tiny fraction of its cattle herd.

The 1.5 billion cows farmed worldwide for cheeseburgers and ice cream sundaes each year accelerate climate change in three main ways: they eat grass and/or grain, like corn and soy, causing them to burp out the highly potent greenhouse gas methane; they poop a lot, which releases the even more potent nitrous oxide, as does the synthetic fertilizer used to grow the grain they’re fed; and they take up a lot of land — a quarter of the planet is occupied by grazing livestock, some of which could be used to absorb carbon from the atmosphere if it weren’t deforested for meat production.

Among other practices, Tyson also lists “pasture rotation,” which entails moving cattle around more frequently with the goal of allowing grass to regrow, which can provide a number of environmental benefits, but many climate scientists are skeptical it can meaningfully reduce emissions.

When asked what benchmark the USDA uses to approve a 10 percent emissions reduction claim, the agency again said I would need to file a FOIA request, and didn’t answer questions about its verification process in time for the deadline for this story.

Meat and dairy production account for at least 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, leading many environmental scientists to conclude that eating more plant-based meals is one of the best actions people can take to fight climate change, and that governments could do much more to steer us in that direction.

In a recent online survey, conducted in partnership with market research consultancy firm Humantel, Vox polled consumers about which parts of the food sector they think contribute most to climate change.


The original article contains 1,494 words, the summary contains 304 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Important quote missed in the summary:

But even if we give Tyson and the USDA the benefit of the doubt, there’s a stubborn truth about beef: It’s so high in emissions that it can never really be “climate-friendly.”

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Entropy exist, but fortunately my priority is a cool society built for humans and their culture. So bring on the culinary delights, bring on Fois Gras. A society that cannot support that for every one is a society that has lost it's purpose. I don't exist to live in a dark closet and eat insects. I live to enjoy my life here, to enojoy my family, fireworks, freedom, and travel. Let's figure out how to make the things that are worth living for sustainable and get rid of things that Capitalism has imposed upon us (like car commuting culture).

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Youtube has been going wild with the greenwashing, I keep getting ads for shit like this it's insufferable.

We use renewable- We're working towards- With your help we can save the envi- Our beef is- shut uuupppp