this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
220 points (100.0% liked)

196

16293 readers
37 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

from the early 18th century

h/t to @jetton@mastodon.online

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

At least this idiot had the excuse of historical linguistics being so underdeveloped; it's understandable he'd think language was immutable... but he's still a total idiot who apparently thought God spoke English in the Bible instead of Latin and Hebrew.

[–] prayer@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

God spoke Aramaic to Paul and wrote in Hebrew to Moses. I don't think he thought of God speaking English in the Bible, rather than English was invented by God and man "ought not corrupt God's language."

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 8 points 10 months ago

These are people who insist that the KJV, perhaps history's absolute worst translation of scripture ever, as the single solitary legitimate version of the Bible.

[–] mashbooq@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Conservatives are so dramatic, Jesus

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if there were 18th century shitposters who turned this into copypasta but subbed in "s" and "ſ" in place of "you" and "thou"

[–] snorkbubs@fedia.io 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ye olde shitte transcribers

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wish whatever jackaſs that decided that the long ſ needed a ſtupid nub at exactly the ſame poſition as the croſsbar of the letter f in Roman typefaces a very unpleaſant afterlife. As if OCRing hiſtorical documents didn't have enough problems already.

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Alt text:

Again, the corrupt and unsound Form of speaking in the Plural Number to a single person, YOU to One, instead of THOU, contrary to the pure, plain, and single Language of TRUTH, THOU to One, and YOU to more than One, which had always been used by GOD to Men, and Men to GOD, as well as one to another, from the oldest Record of Time, till corrupt Men, for corrupt Ends, in later and corrupt Times, to flatter fawn, and work upon the corrupt Nature of Men, brought in that false and senseless Way of speaking YOU to One; which hath since corrupted the modern Languages, and hath greatly debased the Spirits, and depraved the Manners of Men. This evil Custom

[–] z500@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago

HE'LL YEAH BORTHER!!!

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago

needs the ſ in alt text to be correct

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I imagine romans had a lot of bitching about pronouns back in the day. Mostly because bitching about pronouns is an important part of learning Latin over a thousand years later. Like seriously use whatever pronouns you want, but there’s such a thing as too many and that fucking language has too many

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Wow, he foundf ferioif

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

fenflefs. Why use the weird s (f) when they have the normal s

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's called the long s (ſ; ſenſeleſs). It's actually pretty interesting, but unfortunately I don't have much time to explain right now, so in short, it exists because language.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 22 points 10 months ago

English has never not been jank af

[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

they also say fpeaking and spirits, so maybe they were pronounced different

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, they were pronounced exactly the same, but everyone who could write was a nerd

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

But it's still fun to read it as if he had a fat lip.

[–] z500@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The f-like letter is the form they used inside of a word, and it's actually called long s: ſ. Short s was used at the end of a word and after a long s.

[–] N0body@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

Thou art a grammar Prussian, good sir.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

Pure, plain, and single language of T R U T H

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What is the source for this? I feel strong tshirt potential

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] puchaczyk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

I guess isekais weren't the first to make those stupid long titles...

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Wow that's wild. I thought for sure that it was fake.

[–] Z3R0C00l@artemis.camp 5 points 10 months ago

I have a shorter version. LMAO

[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Neat, I did not know that. I was just trying to make a funny since it looked like it said "oof-ed by GOD". Thanks for sharing!

[–] emerald@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

Something about the typeface made me read this with a lisp

[–] nyhetsjunkie@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

That a halluva moufull.