this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
580 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

11086 readers
1437 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riplin@lemm.ee 76 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The spines on a buffalo are a lot thicker and shorter. Any muscle attached to the spines of a spinosaurus would snap them in half.

[–] Venator@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago

Also the buffalo's spine bones are elongated over it's shoulders, whereas the spinosaurus has elongated spine bones start after its shoulders.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TheOakTree@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Laser pickle strikes again

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

An article describing the history of the theory and why it's not really likely: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/was-spinosaurus-a-bison-backed-dinosaur-12849430/

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

YEETASAURES

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love the idea of this, but the size of their chest cavity leaves me wondering if it's feasible.

[–] snorkbubs@fedia.io 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Would there be heavy ligament anchor points on the bones? It seems like there would be evidence of a completely different muscle build, maybe simply by the size of the spine bones themselves. I'm no bonologist, though.

And yeah, that chest is gnarly (but I'm no chestologist).

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Meptastik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol same. new favorite dinosaur. can't wait to harass everyone I know about it 🤗

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I've always been more of an ankylosaurus guy myself.

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Chonkosaurus!

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I love that spinosaurus is such a contentious topic in paleontology.

https://youtu.be/aZlN66mlqsY?si=ZKoxBoznjwf7mYtz

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah we can't even tell if they walk on two legs or four lmao

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe but some modern lizards have spinosaurus like frills so we know it's possible.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago

Though that image of Spino looks shrinkwrapped. Must be old.

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting idea. Aren’t these huge neck muscles mainly for supporting their huge head while grazing?

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Wrong, it's for yeeting lesser mammals

The Yeetasaurus. Majestic.