this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
955 points (98.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1725 readers
168 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

US elects a socialist > the man gets re-elected three times

Lesson learned: We must never get close to implementing social policies!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

FDR wasn't a socialist. He wasn't even a social democrat by any standard but US-brain rot.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Government providing jobs to the unemployed, minimum wage, labor laws, social security... Blocked by the Republicans and a bunch of red Democrats when he wanted to do more...

I'm saying he's a socialist as he was in favour of government intervention to help the population, he wasn't a communist and might have been a social-liberal, it's still on the socialist spectrum.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Socialism is when the government does stuff after all

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When it does stuff like create social programs? Yeah.

That explains the most socialist institution to ever exist, the American military industrial complex. It's a job program!

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

wait this isnt Jackson hinkle

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is a lot of damage to industrialization hopes. Tariffs on metals, lumber, gypsum hurts building and manufacturing. Energy (solar and batteries) tariffs not only means higher energy input costs for industry, it's yet another immediate cost of living increase for people, and an unsustainable planet is a worse cost of living increase/quality of life decrease.

There does seem to be an industrial policy to militarize AI, and monopolize data centers to US, through politicized investment funds, but they are not getting the quo pro their quid, and limiting the world to US controlled data centers is certain to make them prefer/wait for Chinese tech to catch up.

Retaliation, undermining, and boycotts is going to mean less production and less jobs and less income to afford consumption at higher prices. War on Universities doesn't help future. Forcing kids to replace immigrant labour instead of school focus is anti-future.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Well they want a future of control, even if it means giving up geopolitical hegemony

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Biden was doing industrial policy to bring in manufacturing, so naturally Trump abandoned it.

(I wonder what the d-d-democrats bad people thought about the post before I said that. It's Republicans that don't want to.)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›