this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
1810 points (98.9% liked)

pics

22126 readers
2407 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You are a hero

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 minutes ago

Nice. Anyone who takes money from Adobe is a hero to me.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Thank you, Mr. Owens. From the bottom of my heart. InkScape is my favourite graphics tool.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Is Mr Owens British perchance?

I've designed banners and flags in Inkscape, convention signage, even electoral campaign materials like business cards, handcards, campaign signs. A great tool

[–] twt@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

The only time I used Adobe Illustrator was when it was brand new, in 1987. I may have used early versions of Photoshop, but never as my "daily driver." So I might not be the most knowledgeable about Adobe software.

But the thing I MOST resent Adobe for was buying and killing Macromedia... I really really liked Macromedia Fireworks (raster, vector, and object graphics editor). Fireworks could do a lot of the things Adobe software could for a fraction of the price AND without having to use multiple applications to get the job done.

Inkscape is remarkable, and maybe someday someone will merge some raster image object tools into it, and then it might begin to resemble the Fireworks of 20 years ago when Adobe killed it.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 81 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

those dollars were not adobe's to lose but users' to save

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago

This is the heart of the matter. You can't lose what you never had.

[–] lillo@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 5 hours ago

Kudos to Mr. Owens and all Inkscape developers. Inkscape is a masterpiece.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Hitchhikers Guide on the bookshelf, nice.

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

He's a hoopy frood who knows where his towel is.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

I see Pratchett, Making Money up there, too. I like this guy.

[–] PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 hours ago

Making Money, the best Moist Von Lipwig book. Even better.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 7 points 5 hours ago

I urge you to watch his update videos, he's such a neat guy, and he rocks a ska/dandy style

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not all heroes wear capes.

[–] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

Some wear bowler hats

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 378 points 10 hours ago (13 children)

I disagree with that framing, someone not buying your shit is not the same as you losing money. Inkscape saved millions for graphic designers, which is very different. Adobe was not entitled to that money, you can't lose something that was never yours.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 156 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Subtle distinction, but actually pretty huge. I agree with you. Companies also use this to say that pirating is stealing, when they never had the business in the first place.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. I'm pirating because I can't afford to pay hundreds of dollars each month to watch all the movies and shows that I do. If I didn't have the opportunity to pirate, I still wouldn't afford it legitimately...

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

It's also a great way to demo games and other software if you can afford it before you waste money on something that has no value to you. This is especially useful when you're on a tight budget.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 16 points 8 hours ago

Just put in your credit card for the 7 day trial! Totally easy to cancel, pinky promise

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 18 points 7 hours ago

You are right, of course, but I personally draw a great of pleasure from imaging the CEO of Adobe screaming, "CURSE YOU MARTIN OWENS!!!"

[–] Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 9 hours ago

"I bought a lottery ticket and didn't win. I lost 50 millions dollars!"

  • adobe
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I agree. I would never have bought Adobe, I would have not the little bit of vector drawing I have done.

I'm grateful for InkScape, but I wouldn't have bought or downloaded anything otherwise, so I neither saved nor did Adobe lose.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 16 points 9 hours ago

I had exactly 0 intention of ever buying anything from Adobe.

Inkscape gave me an alternative to the high seas. And it happens to do everything I need it to, although it's way more powerful than the simple vector graphics conversions I use it for.

10/10, Adobe never lost money from me getting Inkscape. They lost the game before they knew I was a player.

load more comments (8 replies)

Inkscape is goated and so is Martin, respect 🫡

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I appreciate him very much, OSS maintainers and devs dont get enough praise. Also I dont get the intense entitlement some people have towards unpaid OSS devs and mainatiners, they think that they somehow deserve a product equal to that of a corporate offering while not offering any money or code.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 27 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It's because they haven't thought about it.

They're so used to the paradigm. I pay money. I get product. I get support.

So when they get the product but they don't pay money, their brain short circuits and thinks they deserve some kind of support.

In a capitalistic world, communistic projects are confusing. Which is sad.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

People equate “cost” with “value”. If something has no cost, it has no value. There’s an old story about computer mice that is apt. An electronics store sells computer mice. Some are expensive, some are cheap. The store has found that one specific mouse is really really reliable. Some of the more expensive mice get constant warranty returns or RMA requests. But not this one mouse. This one mouse is built well, feels good, and works great. Every single desk in the store is using one of these mice. And this specific mouse also happens to be extremely cheap. As in, one of the cheapest that the store carries.

Sales floor employees struggle to sell it, even when they personally use it every day and know it’s a superior product, because customers see the low price and assume it is a low quality product. The customers are directly equating cost with value. And so the store manager does something sort of backwards. They increase the price of the mouse, to be around the same price as the others. Suddenly, this specific mouse is flying off of the shelves. People are now seeing the high price, and assuming that means the mouse is good.

Another place you experience this is when helping your family with tech support. Every single IT worker has experienced the “you updated Chrome on my computer six months ago, and now it’s broken. You broke my computer” complaint from a tech-illiterate relative. They see a friend or relative with a computer issue, they know how to solve said issue, they try to be helpful, and it blows back on them when the computer breaks in the distant future. This is largely because the IT person didn’t charge said friend or family member for their services.

In grandma’s eyes, your tech support service were free, so it has no value. You can’t be trusted as a real IT person, because your services are free. Charging a small “friends and family discount” type of thing actually cements in their mind that you do this for a living. You literally do this professionally. Even if you’re only charging them $5 for an hour of work, when you normally get paid $50 per hour. Again, you can call it the friends and family discount if you need to. But by charging them something, all of those “you broke my computer” complaints suddenly dry up. Because now you’re not just the grandson who plays with computers; you’re a professional in a specialized trade. You know what you’re doing, so it couldn’t have been your fault that the computer broke. It’s not really a friends and family discount; it’s a “stop blaming me when you download viruses” fee.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Bingo! I doubled the amount of business I was doing with my side-hustle PC repair by doubling my price. Also, my customers weren't such a pain in the ass.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 9 points 6 hours ago

I don't use Inkscape, but that is a good hat.

[–] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 7 hours ago

Inkscape user here. Thanks Martin!

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 87 points 10 hours ago (16 children)

I am a Corel kind of bird myself, having used it both professionally (which is how I got started with it) and at home for a couple of decades now. I will say two things about that:

In its current version Inkscape is roughly on par with were CorelDraw was in its 4.0 state or thereabouts (which I still have a copy of, on like seventeen 3.5" floppy disks!) which sounds like damning with faint praise but it really isn't considering that Inkscape costs nothing to use.

However, one factor that I think most people don't think about is that Inkscape is currently the best software I've ever used, bar none, for ripping apart .pdf documents made by other software, for the purposes of monkeying with their contents. And that's a ten story tall flaming middle finger to Adobe, and completely obviates the need for 99.9999999% of all users to ever have to pay for the "pro" version of Adobe Acrobat or whatever they're calling it this week just to be able to made minor adjustments to a .pdf.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Have you tried LibreOffice Draw? I love it for that same reason.

I have, but in general I find Inkscape to be superior overall. The last time I tried the LibreOffice component it did not handle multiple pages very well.

[–] kaklerbitmap@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I fucking loved Corel, I've never really found an adequate replacement for it. Guess I'll be giving InkScape a try, thanks

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I had no idea Inkscape could work with PDFs like that. Thank you!

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

I've always used LibreOffice for that purpose. It's more familiar if you're used to office software vs graphics design software.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago

Just don't try it with a 60MB+, 200 page+ file.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)

Open source software does not cause a loss of $ it causes everyone else gain.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Hadn’t heard of it. Will download later.

[–] altphoto 1 points 4 hours ago

Looks like a great guy. I use inkscape when I need nice looking graphics at home for all sorts of things. I've never paid a lot of attention at the names on the about page. Meeting him like this on a photo is pretty cool!

Nice to meet you unilaterally Mr Martin. Thank you!

load more comments
view more: next ›