this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
44 points (79.7% liked)

politics

18625 readers
3721 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A political novice and one of the world’s wealthiest millennials, Vivek Ramaswamy has waged a whirlwind presidential campaign mirroring his meteoric rise as a biotech entrepreneur. On everything from deporting people born in the United States to ending aid to Israel and Ukraine, he consistently displays the bravado of a populist, self-declared outsider.

“I stand on the side of revolution,” he declares. “That’s what I’m going to lead in a way that no establishment politician can.”

In business and politics, though, Ramaswamy has run into skeptics and sometimes hard facts that threatened to derail his ambitions. In the 2024 campaign, the Israel-Hamas war has refocused the Republican primary on foreign policy and exposed just how much Ramaswamy’s self-declared revolutionary approach puts him at odds with the party’s most powerful figures and many of its voters.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 38 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Being a loud obnoxious twatwaffle ≠ confidence

[–] kava@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

He's got the confidence of a frat bro. He talks clearly, loudly, and quickly.

Ramaswamy is dangerous. He's not going to win this election, but the fact that he's gotten so much attention is dangerous. I remember at the beginning, during the first GOP debates, he was all smiles and positivity. His poll numbers started going down and now the last interview I saw with him he starts being aggressive and yelling. I think he's trying to go the angry dictator route now and it's a bad sign that these types of politicians are getting attention.

Fascism is right around the corner

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is to his base. He knows how to sell to them.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

He definitely does. At each debate, he continuously strings together right wing buzzwords like "woke" and "Russia hoax" into incoherent paragraphs and every time he says a new buzzword, the audience applauds.

They really are the dumbest people.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But have you heard me rap like a 12yo white boy from the suburbs?

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Aaannndddd… I regret asking.

[–] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nope, not clicking on that.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

But it rhymes with cake

[–] nyar@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

His interview series makes it clear he's just out for power and wealth, no matter how he can get it.

[–] Bz2486@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its called "fake it til you make it" and i recognized the false confidence the first time i saw this used car salesman talk

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

More like “ Fake it till you break it”

[–] lori@cambrian.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@MicroWave Stuff like this is why I "invented" #anagorism (anti-market anarcho-socialism).

In a #market economy, one has to market oneself.

Market economies grade on confidence, definitely at the expense of competence.

[–] nix@merv.news 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is anti-market anarcho-socialism?

[–] lori@cambrian.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] nix@merv.news 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That must be a bot or something. Both of that user's comments make no sense.

[–] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

"He drew attention from the campus newspaper for his alter ego, “Da Vek,” a rapper who performed using libertarian ideology as lyrics." Because country rap isn't horrible enough, this guy brought libertarian rap into the world. Since he wants to deport American-born children of immigrants, let's deport him.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


ATLANTA (AP) — A political novice and one of the world’s wealthiest millennials, Vivek Ramaswamy has waged a whirlwind presidential campaign mirroring his meteoric rise as a biotech entrepreneur.

In the 2024 campaign, the Israel-Hamas war has refocused the Republican primary on foreign policy and exposed just how much Ramaswamy’s self-declared revolutionary approach puts him at odds with the party’s most powerful figures and many of its voters.

He interned at Goldman Sachs, the most prestigious Wall Street investment house, then won a job at QVT Financial, founded by another Harvard alumnus, Dan Gold.

He named it Roivant — the ROI standing for “return on investment” — and had a clear business model in mind: Buy discount patents for drugs languishing in the development phase, then resurrect them.

In his first big move, Ramaswamy used a subsidiary, Axovant, and paid GlaxoSmithKline $5 million for RVT-101, a potential Alzheimer’s drug already put through multiple trials and deemed not promising enough to continue.

Yet Trump remains such an overwhelming favorite to win the GOP nomination that he has skipped each debate, leaving Ramaswamy to absorb punches most candidates never direct toward the former president.


The original article contains 1,407 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

So wait, this genius businessman thinks he can make money buying parents for drugs even the large pharmaceutical companies didn't find worth pursuing?

How could that possibly turn out to be a solvent business model?

[–] lori@cambrian.social 1 points 9 months ago

@MicroWave Sometimes I go off topic. Probably not the best thing for a manifesto blog. Point taken. astoundingteam.com/wordpress/a…