159

Biden aides are betting that Johnson won't be able to figure this out and are preparing along two tracks.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago

Will his son get an alert notification when the government shuts down?

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

I guess government shutdowns are basically porn for the far right.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Vote Lemon Party

[-] Guitarist@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Only if the government shuts down and watches porn.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

He'll have a lot more time to watch porn when the government shuts down.

Although there's nothing quite like being in his congressional office with his little Johnson out.

[-] swope@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

Someone should look at how much porn downloading and streaming bumps up when government employees are furloughed and have idle hands.

Maybe the evangelicals can be swayed to avoid a government shutdown with that kind of consequence.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Talk about term limits.. zing!

Edit: That was horrible. Can someone else do better?

[-] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

If Johnson can't herd the nutbags, that's not a failure because Johnson is a nutbag. Johnson won't cut a deal with the Democrats like McCarthy did. Johnson, like the rest of the nutbags, will crash the US government because that's the plan.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Lmao I just pictured him with two bags of walnuts on the table gently coaxing them. I think it’s time for coffee..

[-] DBT@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

JESUS TAKE THE WHEEL is in charge let’s gooooo

Edit: we ain’t goin’ nowhere lmao

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

truck swerves off the ravine because Jesus is imaginary

[-] swope@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

Off the ravine or into it?

We've been in the ravine for a while I guess.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

We have left the ravine.

We have entered the canyon.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

So how many months ago was a functional house supposed to pass a budget?

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 19 points 7 months ago

This isn’t about budgets. It’s about not fixing what is broken. Basically prior to Nixon, Congress authorized a maximum debt amount and the president was meant to spend it on programs that Congress wanted. Nixon decided he wouldn’t spend the money, which offended Congress and they changed how laws were written so that the president wouldn’t have a choice. Nobody ever removed the system of spending caps and here we are.

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Geez feels like at least 3.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
159 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18073 readers
2939 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS