this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
406 points (97.9% liked)

Programming

20279 readers
689 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 40 points 2 days ago (23 children)

That middle graph is absolute fucking bullshit. AI is not fucking ever going to replace 75% of developers or I've been working way too fucking hard for way to little pay these past 30 years. It might let you cut staff 5-10% because it enables folks to accomplish certain things a bit faster.

Christ on a fucking crutch. Ask developers who are currently using AI (not the ones working for AI companies) how much time and effort it actually saves them. They will tell you.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I use it here and there. it just seems to shift effort from writing code to reading and fixing code. the "amount" of work is about the same.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

I hear that. Given I need practice in refactoring code to improve my skills, it's not useless to me right now but overall it doesn't seem like a net gain.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It doesn’t have to make sense or make the outcome be better, the only thing it has to do is make the company look better on paper to its shareholders. If something can make the company look better on paper it will be done, the quality of the work is not relevant

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Not only the shareholders. If some of the higher level administration can get richer in the short run, even if that might actually hurt the shareholders in the medium run, you can bet that many of them will do so.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm 90% sure it's something to do with the stock market, buy backs and companies having to do cryptic shit to keep up with a fake value to their shares

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also is substack the new meduim? I cant keep up with these freemium wordpress/blog clones.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why do people always have to use some freemium offering when there's an opensource, self-hosted or already hosted variant out there? I don't get it. Just riding the wave I guess.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My guess? The freemium stuff gives the promise of $$ after a certain level of popularity. And they make it VERY easy to use.

Personally, ive been thinking of using writefreely for its seamless integration of fediverse...but I really dont have a lot to say in the traditional space. IE screaming at the wailing wall (or at least it feels like screaming at the wailing wall).

[–] sirdorius@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does a writefreely instance appear on lemmy as a community with posts written by the author? That would be so cool, and would go in the right direction of integrating different kinds of social media in one client.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I may test it out. I believe it will at least work with RSS and Piefed.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago

AI-assisted coding […] means more ambitious, higher-quality products

I'm skeptical. From my own (limited) experience, my use-cases and projects, and the risks of using code that may include hallucinations.

there are roughly 29 million software developers worldwide serving over 5.4 billion internet users. That's one developer for every 186 users,

That's an interesting way to look at it, and that would be a far better relation than I would have expected. Not every software developer serves internet users though.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 12 points 2 days ago

Its not that dumb as you think, its way dumber.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you expect? Half of these decision makers are complete idiots that are just good at making money and think that that means they are smarter than anyone who makes less than them. They then see some new hyped up tech, they chat with ChatGPT and they are dump enough to be floored by it's "intelligence" and now they think it can replace workers but since it's still early, they assume that it will quickly surpass the workers. So in their mind, firing ten programmers and saving like two million a year, while only spending maybe a few tens of thousands a year on AI will be a crazy success that will show how smart they are. And as time goes on and the AI gets better, they will save even more money. So why spend more money to help the programmers improve, when you can just fire them and spend a fraction of it on AI?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Right now? They’ve been doing this for two years!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›