104
She should be asking if this was his plan all along when he propped up Hammas over a civilian government..
The plan proceeds apace: Benjamin Netanyahu rules out return of Palestinian Authority in Gaza
Props to Wolf Blitzer and Dana Bash; both are Jewish CNN anchors who are not afraid to call Israel out on their bullshit.
Perhaps they can look more than 24 hours in the future and can see that the project to equate "judaism" and "Netanyahu" will be very very bad news for Jewish people for decades to come.
He's basically the Jewish version of Trump.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
CNN anchor Dana Bash pressed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to respond to Israeli concerns on whether he would accept some responsibility for failing to anticipate the Oct. 7 massacre in an interview on Sunday.
In response, Netanyahu repeatedly dodged the issue, saying on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he would discuss those concerns after the war is over.
“Prime Minister Netanyahu, before I let you go, I know you’ve been asked this several times.
But I have had multiple people inside Israel reach out to me knowing that I was going to interview you and say the one thing they want to hear from you is that you take personal responsibility for failing to prevent the October 7 attacks and protecting your people.
Bash then asked directly what his answer is to Israelis who are disappointed that he still won’t take responsibility.
Hamas, a US-designated terrorist organization that rules Gaza, launched a surprise attack on Israel’s southern border, brutally killing 1,400 Israelis and taking about 240 hostages.
The original article contains 400 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
104 points (96.4% liked)
politics
18073 readers
4466 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS