this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
219 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

70415 readers
3477 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 120 points 6 days ago (11 children)

New cars absolutely do have dipsticks; they're the ones designing them.

Notwithstanding the potential for software bugs or other issues inherent with monitoring oil levels only digitally, monitoring just the oil level is not the sole purpose of the dipstick. Being able to physically see a sample of the engine oil is a vital diagnostic tool and can alert an owner or mechanic to a head gasket problem or other oil contamination issue, or if something is grinding metal shavings into the oil, etc.

For what it's worth I have yet to actually physically see a new vehicle without an oil dipstick. I guess they're out there, but so far I've been lucky. But I have already had quite a few automatic transmission equipped cars without a transmission dipstick cross my path, and that's already enough of a pain in the ass. If you're lucky there's a side plug in the transmission case you can use to check the fluid condition and level (after crawling under the vehicle...) but in a lot of cases there isn't even that -- your only recourse is to drop the transmission pan off entirely, which causes you to lose all the fluid in the process. And you'll probably also have to replace the gasket while you're at it. Needless to say, this is an incredibly moronic design decision.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was hilarious when I saw that Briggs and Stratton has been selling small engines featuring "no oil changes needed" (or possible). They advertise that it's "oiled for the life of the engine" ... well, by definition, yes, that's like saying "if you light a man on fire he'll be warm for the rest of his life". These companies are so predatory and transparently trying to turn durable products into disposable replacement services, it's unbelievable.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Can confirm; I used to manage a hardware store with an attached small engine repair shop. There's a reason Briggs and Stratton abbreviates so readily to "BS."

They've been trying to do the absolute bare minimum possible to maximize profits and making their machines flimsy and deliberately uneconomical to repair for several decades, now. All I can say is that we ought to be thankful for aftermarket parts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 6 days ago (6 children)

For what it's worth I have yet to actually physically see a new vehicle without an oil dipstick.

It seems to be mostly a euro thing. BMW stopped using oil dipsticks nearly 2 decades ago. Land Rover also somewhere in the late 00's.

But I agree it's a moronic idea. Not only does it prevent you from checking oil condition like you said; if it's after an oil change, it takes about 15min just to check the level (and another 15 if you messed it up). At $150+/hr shop rates, that adds up.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It seems to be mostly a euro thing. BMW stopped using oil dipsticks nearly 2 decades ago.

I was about to make this joke: "That's just not true. My 2008 BMW had a... holy shit, that car is nearly 2 decades old now." Then I went to confirm, and that car did NOT have a dipstick. The car came with 5 years of "free" service and never gave me a day of trouble, so I never realized it didn't have a dipstick. That's probably a major reason it was removed, since even a DIYer like me who likes to work on things myself never even tried to use the dipstick in 4 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (7 children)

My wife has a 2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee. The AC condenser got a leak in it and it was going to be over $2k to fix in a shop. I took it on myself to save money. The condenser mounts to the back of the radiator, so I had to get at it by removing the bumper and everything between that and the engine block. Also attached part of the radiator is the transmission cooler. Unhooking everything meant that I was going to lose some fluids, but that was fine, I'd top them off and pay to have refrigerant added.

After I reassembled, I when to check the trans fluid levels, and couldn't find the dipstick. It turns out, like you said, if you crawl under the vehicle, on the back of the trans pan is a bolt you can remove, and if you have a special dipstick that you buy separately for this sole purpose, you can stick it in there to check levels. There's not way to add fluid without pumping it in there, but at least you can see how much you have.

Since I only lost less than a quart, I took it into the shop, explained what's up, and asked for it to be topped off. The shop guy calls back later, and told me that to do the trans fluid, the filter is only sold with a whole new pan, and because Chrysler, the fluid cost like $40 a qt, and I needed like 15 to fill it. It still cost more than $800 to just do that, then more than $500 for the refrigerant. I still saved about $500-1k in parts and labor for what I did, but, the lack of dipstick and fill tube was an extremely inconvenient and expensive thing.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 68 points 6 days ago (6 children)

This proactive approach helps to avert potential engine damage

Ah yes, the old "you're too stupid to do anything by yourself, so we kindly prevent you from trying"

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I would argue that it adds a new failure point, and a catastrophic one at that.

Yes, many hunans don't monitor their oil properly. I've seen some destroy engines because they thought the low oil light could be ignored for a week.

Even if you still had the dipstick, owners would become reliant on the sensor and grenade the engine when it gets it wrong. Remember how Teslas had hoods that flew open while driving? The problem wasn't the latch. The problem was owners relying on a crappy sensor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, see, they just relocated the dipstick. You can locate it just behind the steering wheel, right above the driver's seat.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've had a car with where the oil pressure sensor failed; combine that with an oil leak, and you quickly have a major problem. So, what happens when the sensor telling you the oil level fails? A dipstick is extremely unlikely to ever fail to work correctly, so...?

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You would think an engineer would understand this.... I assume this is a decision from management.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Engineers are people like everyone else and some people have no qualms fucking over other people for money.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

The Engineer was also told they would get a bonus if they could make maintenance more common and more expensive under the guise of improved technology.

"Grok told me this was the right thing. Nom nom, this superglue bathsalt pizza is delicious"

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

reinventing the wheel in the DUMBEST way possible at best.

planned obsolescence when the sensors or the head gasket inevitably fail at worst.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why the clickbait? Just put why in the title or post description

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

New Cars Don't All Come With Dipsticks Anymore Because Of Digital Oil Level Measurement

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 34 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The article is really lazy about citing its sources.

many cars don't come with dipsticks anymore. Some sources say

Are these some sources in the room with us?

it's because automakers don't trust us to use them, so why make them? (That's kind of along the lines of rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it, right?) Or maybe it's some kind of conspiracy to keep drivers coming in for oil changes more often.

This is like an eighth grader padding out a book report.

But in actuality, it's because a lot of things are going digital.

Tl;dr: Here's a higher quality source: Why the Reliable Dipstick is Sliding into Obsolescence

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My wife’s electric car doesn’t have a dipstick.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 29 points 6 days ago

Unless you're sitting in it. ;)

[–] intheformbelow@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Oil is essential. However, those manufacturers that claim you have to change synthetic oil three times a year are full of shit.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago

Depends on how much you drive, and what the recommended interval is. If the interval is 7k miles, and you drive 18k in a year, yeah, you need to change the oil 3x/year.

It seems to me that counting the number of cycles each makes, and basing your intervals off that would make more sense than mileage. If I'm constantly running at high RPM, that should require more frequent oil changes in terms of mileage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My wife has a 2016 Honda Odyssey, and having grown up working on cars because my dad was a mechanic, I was shocked to learn that there is no transmission fluid dip stick. It's considered a closed system and never needs to have the fluid changed, allegedly.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The U660F transmission in my wife's 2015 Highlander doesn't have a dipstick. Luckily that transmission is solid and easy to service anyway, you just need a skinny funnel to fill it.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It's a lifetime fluid! For the life of ur transmission! If it'll make it to 100k miles they could care less what happens after that. When your 16 odyssey needs a transmission at 130 are u gonna put 6k into it or go buy a other car?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

I've wondered this for a while and this seems like a good time to ask: Do electric cars use motor oil in the same way as an internal combustion vehicle? Like do you need to get oil changes in an all electric the same way and have a need for a dipstick?

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 25 points 6 days ago

Electric cars do have oil that will ultimately need changing but it's less exposed to contaminants than the engine oil in a internal combustion engine and therefore will last a lot longer. EVs typically have a reduction gearbox and differential and these will require oil changes in a similar fashion to a manual gearbox or differential in a ICE vehicle - i.e. barring exceptional circumstances it will last long enough to get out of warranty but don't believe it will never need changing.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Nope. The only fluid I worry about in my EV is windshield wiper fluid.

[–] intheformbelow@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Eventually, you'll have to top up your blinker fluid as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (8 children)

No brake calipers or power steering onboard?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

And the blinker one right? EVs still have that afaik.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShawiniganHandshake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure if this is universally true but I've never seen a fully electric vehicle that uses motor oil. Hybrid vehicles with an internal combustion engine and an electric drive train would still need it, of course.

Not having to take my car for oil changes is bliss.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

It still has oil in the transmission. And yes, you are supposed to change it occasionally because its high slip friction oil that burns over time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Back when I worked at a BMW store we had to, after changing the oil, start up the vehicle and get it up to temperature before it would give us a reading. Several times the vehicle caught on fire for some reason during this process. So fucking stupid.

The real reason is that owners would not reseat the dipstick properly, which would cause a vacuum leak and a lean fuel mixture that would trigger the CEL.

But you can't expect Jalopnik writers to know basic facts like this.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The real reason is that owners would not reseat the dipstick properly, which would cause a vacuum leak and a lean fuel mixture that would trigger the CEL.

That is absolutely piss-poor design. But definitely a BMW thing to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't like it because:

  • I want to look at the oil and smell it, not just check the level.
  • I don't know the failure modes for the sensor, so I can't trust that the absence of a complaint from it means the oil level is correct.
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

Exactly

Right now there is no better detection system than in

  • Seeing the oil level
  • seeing the oil color
  • smelling the oil content
  • feeling the oil viscosity and any contamination
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Because manufacturers are scummy, that's why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

This sounds like an old Mercedes problem: Why even having a dipstick when there isn't any drain bolt? The Mechanic sucks all the oil from the top using a vacuum. Grime buildup down in the oil pan? Ain't care! The car will break anyway, once it's out of warranty.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago (11 children)

I hate all these automatic sensors in new cars. I don't usually buy new cars, I get ones that are a few years used. Almost all of them have a light on the dash for a "tire error" because the stupid sensor has died and no one in their right mind wants to spend $300 to replace a thing that tells you your tire pressure is low. Plus, the things die in a few years anyway.

I just do the Homer Simpson solution and put a bit of black tape over the tire error light.

load more comments (11 replies)

Just forcing more people towards mechanics. Can’t see levels or if there might be an issue with a lubricant, so if you burn up a transmission, guess you gotta buy a new one.

load more comments
view more: next ›