this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
869 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45295 readers
1318 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] animist@lemmy.one 148 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Beehaw admins: there are only four of us moderating everything

Community: so ask people to be ~~admins~~ mods

Beehaw admins: i can't understand a goddamn word you're saying

Edit: meant to say mods not admins

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are now banned from participating in Beehaw

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Garrathian@fanaticus.social 58 points 1 year ago

"Only 4 of us moderating"

"Refuses to add mods meanwhile accepting 1000s of applications to join and building said community in a federated space where anyone outside their instance can participate"

Yep, definitely well planned out by those folks hahaha.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn’t make sense for moderators to have full admin access. Lemmy allows multiple moderators to a work a community, and BeeHaw just needs to do that.

[–] animist@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah that was my mistake, I meant to say mods, not admins

[–] Scraft161@iusearchlinux.fyi 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I personally find beehaw's moderation weird, I get that you're trying to create a safe and regulated space, but you simple can't do that with 4 mods on the entire instance. I do think that their decision to jump to defederation is a result of these 4 people being overworked and simply not having the time to rationally evaluate the situation.

if they want to continue like this they'll have to evaluate on whether to appoint proper mods to their communities or just decide to change their stance on "safe" content.

[–] Tetsuo666@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I respect their decision but at the same time I wonder why they didn't create a standalone unfederated from the get go.

If you want to keep the community small and tightly nit it's just not compatible with the federation system. Now people got invested in some beehaw communities only to end up disconnected from them.

Still, it's not like there is a guide for this. We are all learning how to make the federation work. I hope we can keep it civil toward instances that choose to defederate.

We are all invested in the same thing: Making Lemmy successful.

[–] JeffCraig@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't a lot of Beehaws complaints the lack of moderation on other instances, not specifically their own?

If they're struggling with managing their own content, they certainly shouldn't have to worry about content from other instances. Any instance that hasn't managed to sort out their own moderation should be defederated until they figure it out.

Every individual community inside each instance should have its own set of moderators or it should not exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There doesn’t seem to be many moderation tools for people who don’t own the instance

[–] OtakuAltair@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Yet. Sync for Lemmy should be coming out in 4~ weeks and Memmy is heavily inspired by Apollo and is being developed fast.

Though I wouldn't expect mod tools in their first release.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Irisos@lemmy.umainfo.live 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if you own an instance, the tools are non-existent.

Some basics things that should be present but aren't:

  • A user directory for search and deletion
  • Possibility to block communities for your whole instance
  • Basic statistics. Both on the community and instance level
  • Possibility to mute a user without banning them
  • Allow creating a community but only after admin approval (right now it's free for all or admin only)
  • Easy access to server logs without having to dig directly inside the hosting server
  • Importing block/allow lists for federations using a file or url
  • Adding an administrator from the server admin UI

The API is also lacking in a way that some of those things are not possible without deploying your own API talking directly with the postgress database.

For example, if you wanted to see upvote/downvotes for each individual users, the data to calcultate it is in the database but the Lemmy API doesn't provide that functionality.

While Lemmy is great as a platform, the management side of is glueing everything together just enough to not let it implode.

[–] Nerd02@forum.basedcount.com 15 points 1 year ago

My team and I are planning to start working on an AutoMod bot in the near future. It's going to be built with our custom instance in mind, but the code will he open source for everyone to use.

[–] TrippyTortuga@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can code, but I've never been a moderator. What kind of mod tools do you want?

EDIT: More discussion about mod tools: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3281

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fricking flairs, they're very important in the communities that I'm moderating. With an ability to set multiple flairs at once because on reddit you can set only one which sucks because some posts can fit criteria to get 2 or more flairs.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

okay, let's talk turkey. let's define some requirements for the mod tools, and then we can start talking about how to satisfy those requirements.

[–] possum@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has this ever happened? From what I can tell asking people to fix their issues is the first step, and defederation only happens when they can't/won't fix them yet

[–] Nerd02@forum.basedcount.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure if there's any lore behind it but I've also seen this. The beehaw admins seem to have an habit of making problems go away by pressing the magic button.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotBabaYaga@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea this is really important, and also we need a way to moderate the moderators so we don't end up with the "super" mods we saw on Reddit...

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just contacting admins of your instance would do, they have the ability to remove and appoint new mods.

[–] whiny9130@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

this is called "meta-moderation" and is a good idea @notbabayaga@lemmy.world :) it's part of the Santa Clara Principles of transparent moderation (https://santaclaraprinciples.org/)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Noedel@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Rhabuko@feddit.de 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Nobody de-federated. People saw that there was a the_Donald community on sh.itjust.works + a lot of people from said server defending it ("just ignore it bro"). That triggered probably bad memories ala spez defending t_D because of "VaLuABlE DiSCuSsIoN", while they brigaded and harrased countless people during their time on Reddit. Some people got a little bit carried away and demanded de-federation and a couple of trolls throw gazoline in the fire.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A community does not have a right to exist on a certain person's server. They should delete The_Donald and move on.

[–] Rhabuko@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The community got deleted by the admin.

[–] OtakuAltair@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

It got deleted quite quickly. By the time I saw the local community post about it it was already gone.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody de-federated

Beehaw defederated sh.itjust.works and I think Lemmy.world

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarrexx@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is one of the personal fears I have about society's where 'the mob' decides. Most people haven't had their fate decided by a mob before and so might not know what this means or how it pans out most of the time.

I believe it is imperative that we have something in place to avoid mob actions - not a central authority per say but possibly a collective code we all believe in and abide by. We could perhaps establish what is (un)acceptable on a fediversal (universal) scale and what is (un)acceptable on a local instances (instances decide this themselves obv.)

In the future we might need Lemmy/ActivityPub to be able to define posts/accounts/communities that are accessible across the Fediverse and those that are only accessible to users of that instance.

Hence we wouldn't have the problem where for instance: members of one instance think pictures of furries is not NSFW content but members from other instances think it is

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’ll never understand this moral handwringing about mob rule.

No one is burning witches. There’s no value to having a bunch of neo-nazi perspectives. They’re not useful, productive or worth platforming.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. No fucking nazis that should be banned automatically whenever they try to start any community.

Fuckers can stay on true social or whatever the hell trump calls his platform and stay away from Lemmy.

[–] shadyacres@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You realize a major purpose of federation is so that content can't be censored so easily by a central authority? This isn't Twitter. If you need a safe space, the fediverse isn't for you.

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago

This is exactly the space for creating all sorts of spaces. No one needs to federate with you here. It's up to instance owners and there's plenty of instances.

Nazi trash can stay entirely off any instance that I'm on and if they show up and nothing is done I'll go elsewhere. Period.

[–] Rivalarrival 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't even recognize the danger you are complicit in creating.

Niemöller recognized it, when he said:

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Thomas Paine recognized it when he said:

He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.

The problem with participating in a mob that attacks Nazis is that the mob isn't done when the Nazis are all dead. The mob is still around, still looking for enemies to oppress.

The idea that it is socially acceptable to oppress an undesirable group is the exact principle that allowed the German people to promote the mob rule of the Nazi party. By the time they realized what they had created, they were forced to support it, even if they were horrified by what they were doing. Anyone questioning the continued need for their mob found themselves an enemy of it, and thus targeted by it.

That's the problem with fascism. It is an extremely attractive idea. Fascism arises when we as a society determine we have the right to suppress anything we don't like, without bothering to consider that nobody is universally liked. When fascism runs out of enemies, it manufactures new ones out of its least liked supporters. The mob you create today is the same mob that will be lynching you tomorrow.

The solution that our grandparents and great-grandparents came up with reiterates Niemöller and Paine. They developed a philosophical principle best summarized as:

I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

When Nazis are talking, the appropriate response is to talk back, not prohibit them from talking. When we ignore them, censor them, or impose silence on them, they win.

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago (12 children)

You could read Karl Popper's The Paradox of Tolerance.

There's no need to debate Nazism or Fascism with Nazis and Fascists. The education on it should come from historians and those otherwise educated in it.

When we censor Nazis we win. When we let them into our spaces we lose.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheLemmiestLemmy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

An iOS app would be wonderful. It's the only thing stopping me from being a full-time Lemmy user right now.

[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There is one called Mlem. You can find it and other apps on the website: https://join-lemmy.org/apps

load more comments (4 replies)

don't worry, they're coming. a bunch of bigger third party app Devs have said they will make an app for Lemmy, and that will include iOS apps as well I'm sure. it's just a matter of time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See this post of mine which was prompted by a mastodon dev reviewing moderation tools on lemmy and kbin:

https://lemmy.ml/post/1286830

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I had a conversation with the reviewer, and my impression was that headway could be made without too much difficulty.

If anyone’s keen, and willing to work in rust or Typescript, there’s probably work you could be doing right now to make better moderation tools.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Defed is the new Ban Hammer

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except instead of banning people for no reason you ban entire servers for no reason

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think of it as banning an entire server until they clean up that server.

Until there are tools to more granularly ban specific comminities or users, it’s the only thing you can do if you don’t want nazis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zetaphor@zemmy.cc 11 points 1 year ago

All of the memes and threads I've seen complaining about this are from the instances that are being defederated, rather than from within Beehaw itself. In fact if you go and read the threads where they discuss these changes it seems the majority of the Beehaw users are okay with this.

Reddit admins made a unilateral change that the majority didn't like and now we're all here on Lemmy, why is everyone suddenly acting like Lemmy instances are any different?

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What was Elmo supposed to have been doing in the innocent interpretation of this image? I swear they had to have known.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MacDougal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of the requests I've seen is people trying to create another echo chamber

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›