this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
393 points (98.3% liked)

science

18833 readers
378 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not only is Trump leveling science funding at NASA, like he did with the National Science Foundation, but look closely at the budget. Beginning next year at 800 million and by 2030, 3.5 billion (nearly 20% of its budget), NASA is required to work towards “Commercial Moon and Mars Infrastructure and Transportation”. The ultimate subsidy for the commercial space sector.

They also eliminated STEM engagement program, which provided funding for the next generation of scientists to participate in NASA opportunities. I can’t wait for all this greatness Trump has been preaching to arrive.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mriormro@lemm.ee 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Trump is doing more for the science programs in other nations than those nations ever could.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 122 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So, we all know what's going on here, right? They're gutting any part of our society that relies on intellectual work and trying to compete with motherfucking robots to bring factories back. They want to cram everyone into sweatshops. The plan was never to bring good jobs back, the plan was always live-in factories and suicide nets on the windows.

E: well, at least the Roman space telescope lives on, I guess. I'm unreasonably excited for it; it's already built and just needs to be launched, basically.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 64 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The Roman telescope will likely get shoved in storage. I work on it right now, we are talking internally about what this means. Obviously, I have no more information than you do, but the cuts are severe enough that there's no way we will be able to keep working on it at the current levels if this goes through.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 26 points 4 days ago

FUCK. Wishing you guys all the best!

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The plan was never to bring good jobs back, the plan was always live-in factories and suicide nets on the windows.

Bold of you to assume they'll spring for nets.

[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago

It's not like American scientists and intellectuals will flee to other nations that value themselves more, crippling US innovation...right?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is NASA a threat to Elon's monopolization of launches?

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Pretty much, why let the public sector do something when you can funnel government contracts to private industry for kickbacks?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 38 points 4 days ago (28 children)

It's okay. Europe and China will replace the US and the world will be better off.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

. Europe and China will replace the US and the world will be better off.

Only if China finally gets to choose their own leaders. Until then it is fucked up even worse.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (37 children)

Not sure that's true, but alright

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is the same vibe as when the CEO gets a million dollar raise but we don't have money for cost of living increases this year.

Sorry USA kids. No astronaut program this summer. Dream smaller this year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cryoistalline@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I seriously don't understand why he is doing this. Isn't trump friends with eslong musk? The way i'm seeing this is cutting the budget for nasa would only go against elon. If he wanted to save money, then he should have just cut military spending.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

Trump doesn't want to save money, he wants to reward people who reward him. You can't analyze anything he does in terms of anything he claims to be doing.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

His goal is a destroy the United States of America.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

His goal is a destroy the United States of America.

Once everyone understands this, his actions make sense.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It also aligns suspiciously well with Putin's goals.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Putin won the cold war. This is what it looks like.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 45 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

So, Trump wants NASA to get to the Moon and Mars by 2030 while on a slashed budget with limited scientists? Get ready for more spacecraft to drop out of the sky.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 42 points 4 days ago

No, Trump does not want NASA to get to the Moon or Mars.

Trump wants NASA to be a tool that funnel money from the government to billionaires, aka Musk and Bezos

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Nu-uh magic Musk is going to fix all our problems.

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Sadly, getting more places with less money is absolutely possible, but the key to making it happen is abandoning planetary science. It’s a shift from a paradigm where engineering exists to support planetary science efforts to engineering for engineering’s sake

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don’t forget that women and marginalized populations are now being discriminated against.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

More openly than before with even less recourse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and we'll call the company, Union Aerospace Corporation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›